New Fender Tone Master Twin Reverbs....only 33lbs!
Moderator: Dave Mudgett
- Ken Metcalf
- Posts: 3702
- Joined: 21 Oct 2005 12:01 am
- Location: San Antonio Texas USA
I use a TM Twin and get a good sound with a Sarno Black box.
The point of having a ToneMaster Twin is to have a 33Lb amp.
Comparing it to an 80-90 Lb. amp is silly.
I had a nice 67 Twin and hauled it around for years,
I sold it.
Too heavy for weekly gigs.
I also have an S-12 Universal in split cases.
A D-10 is 80-90 Lbs.
Just my two cents.
The point of having a ToneMaster Twin is to have a 33Lb amp.
Comparing it to an 80-90 Lb. amp is silly.
I had a nice 67 Twin and hauled it around for years,
I sold it.
Too heavy for weekly gigs.
I also have an S-12 Universal in split cases.
A D-10 is 80-90 Lbs.
Just my two cents.
MSA 12 String E9th/B6th Universal.
Little Walter PF-89.
Bunch of stomp boxes
Little Walter PF-89.
Bunch of stomp boxes
- Larry Dering
- Posts: 5777
- Joined: 17 May 2013 11:20 am
- Location: Missouri, USA
Ken, absolutely true and the weight issue is why I bought the Tonemaster Twin. That comparison was for knowing what if I tried xyz speaker. I use a black box too. To me there's something missing in the tone that the amp controls can't make better. I tried a Boss graphic EQ and wasn't able to make it any better. I don't mean to trash the amp. And I'm still searching for a solution. I will continue to explore other speaker options that are lighter.
- Dave Campbell
- Posts: 708
- Joined: 31 Jul 2013 7:43 am
- Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
i don't think comparing them is silly; what else are nerds supposed to do? besides, the tonemaster purports to be a tube twin.
this nerd took both amps to rehearsal last night. all agreed that by itself the original twin sounded magical. all agreed that while playing with the full band the tonemaster had a bit of an edge with a tighter sounding bass. all agreed that the reverb on the tonemaster sucked.
this nerd took both amps to rehearsal last night. all agreed that by itself the original twin sounded magical. all agreed that while playing with the full band the tonemaster had a bit of an edge with a tighter sounding bass. all agreed that the reverb on the tonemaster sucked.
- Dan Beller-McKenna
- Posts: 3151
- Joined: 3 Apr 2005 1:01 am
- Location: Durham, New Hampshire, USA
- Contact:
After two years, I take my Tonemaster to almost every gig I do. If weight were no issue, I'd definitely bring my '71 Twin to most gigs. But(!), volume control is also an issue. The "real" Twin needs to get up to at lest 4 on the volume to really sound like itself. That's too loud for some jobs. To wit, my monthly gig has gone to in-ears. It would be defeating the purpose (i.e. bringing down stage volume) for me to haul the original Twin and crank it. Of course it weighs too much (even split into two pieces!), so the Tonemaster is getting the call anyway.
I will never sell the '71. Fed into a 15" Peavey/JBL speaker it sounds too good to let go. But it only comes out for select shows.
I will never sell the '71. Fed into a 15" Peavey/JBL speaker it sounds too good to let go. But it only comes out for select shows.
- Larry Dering
- Posts: 5777
- Joined: 17 May 2013 11:20 am
- Location: Missouri, USA
- Danny Naccarato
- Posts: 1229
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Burleson, Texas