The new PF350 Eminance speaker .. are you using it?

Steel guitar amplifiers, effects, etc.

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

Post Reply
User avatar
Scott Appleton
Posts: 1099
Joined: 24 Mar 2003 1:01 am
Location: Ashland, Oregon

The new PF350 Eminance speaker .. are you using it?

Post by Scott Appleton »

Who's using the new PF350 Eminance speaker ?
User avatar
George Seymour
Posts: 870
Joined: 14 Nov 1999 1:01 am
Location: Notown, Vermont, USA

Post by George Seymour »

I am, listen to Paul Franklins Demo of the speaker, in my opinion his assessment of the speaker response is spot on to me, Superb speaker, heavy though.
Old Emmons D-10's & Wrap Resound 65, Standel amps!
Old Gibson Mastertones
John Goux
Posts: 946
Joined: 25 Mar 2015 12:24 pm
Location: California, USA

Post by John Goux »

I have one in a 1-12.
It sounds big and has lots of low end. In a side by side comparison it is similar to an EV, and about the same weight.
I haven’t gigged with it much because I actually prefer the 80’s well worn EV. I think that old speaker has better balance and less punch. The PF still needs to be broken in, so it will improve.
John
User avatar
George Seymour
Posts: 870
Joined: 14 Nov 1999 1:01 am
Location: Notown, Vermont, USA

Re: The new PF350 Eminance speaker .. are you using it?

Post by George Seymour »

Scott Appleton wrote:Who's using the new PF350 Eminance speaker ?
Rousing response Scott :D great speaker

Do you have one yet?
Old Emmons D-10's & Wrap Resound 65, Standel amps!
Old Gibson Mastertones
User avatar
Tim Mathews
Posts: 18
Joined: 10 Oct 2017 12:52 pm
Location: Missouri, USA

Yes

Post by Tim Mathews »

Put one in my hot rodded peavey 112 . “Nashville 112 redux”


I don’t play much C6 so I can’t speak to that, but I have been very happy with it on the commercial neck. Solid bass response and very controllable midrange. The weight is another issue but I knew that going in.

When my back screams a little louder I might try a TT or an EPS. but until then I’m happy.
Alan Rudd
Posts: 2799
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 12:01 am
Location: Ardmore, Oklahoma
Contact:

Post by Alan Rudd »

Just put the PF350 in my NV112 and I like it a lot...much better low end response, although a bit heavier, I think, for me it is worth the improvement...
Last edited by Alan Rudd on 18 Mar 2020 5:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
George Kimery
Posts: 3691
Joined: 23 Feb 2002 1:01 am
Location: Limestone, TN, USA

The new PF 350 Eminence speaker. Who' using it.

Post by George Kimery »

I tried one and thought it was a very good sounding speaker. However, I just couldn't deal with the weight.I replaced it with a TT 12. Much lighter and sounded close to the PF 350. To me the difference in sound wasn't worth the difference in weight. I replaced the TT 12 with a JBL D-130 and to my ears, it beats them both.
I now have two Walker Stereo Steel cabinets and an Evans SE 200. D-130's in all of them. There's just something special about those old JBL's that I don't hear in other speakers I've had.
Jon Voth
Posts: 308
Joined: 12 Sep 2018 10:03 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Post by Jon Voth »

I also bought one (off the forum) and put it in my Nashville 112.

I have tin ears but to me it brings more meat to the sound. It rounds out my 112. I like it, and can always change it back or try it on other amps.

It is quite heavy.
Paul Sutherland
Posts: 2732
Joined: 8 Mar 2007 3:45 pm
Location: Placerville, California

Post by Paul Sutherland »

I just received one this afternoon and put it in an old Twin Reverb cabinet that has been converted to a speaker only cabinet. I played it for about 45 minutes and found I had to turn the treble up substantially over what I would normally use with a JBL. What I like so far is that the high end doesn't bite your head off like sometimes happens with JBLs. I can get the sound bright without being piercing. I wish I could play a gig with it, but...
It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing.
Cody Stewart
Posts: 258
Joined: 6 Mar 2018 10:29 am
Location: Traverse City Michigan, USA

Post by Cody Stewart »

Best speakers I’ve found for my ears. Heavy and durable!

Image
Bolt On’s: Red Belly, Brown Belly, 73 Sho~Bud Pro~II, Fender’s/Peavey’s. If it doesn't sound like 1968, then I probably won’t like it.
Paul Sutherland
Posts: 2732
Joined: 8 Mar 2007 3:45 pm
Location: Placerville, California

Post by Paul Sutherland »

I've been playing through a single PF350 for almost a month, mostly pushing it with a Twin Reverb in a head cab. It really sounds fantastic. I've tried to go back to JBLs and they sound harsh by comparison. For most of my gigs before this Covid thing my amp was mic'd, so I don't think there is a need for two of those heavy speakers, but Cody's rig sure looks killer.

I think at least a part of that smooth, rich tone that Paul Franklin gets comes from his signature speaker.
It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing.
Kenneth Kotsay
Posts: 953
Joined: 8 Jan 2000 1:01 am
Location: Davie/Ft Lauderdale, Florida
Contact:

Post by Kenneth Kotsay »

Where can you purchase the PF 350?

Ken
Paul Sutherland
Posts: 2732
Joined: 8 Mar 2007 3:45 pm
Location: Placerville, California

Post by Paul Sutherland »

I got my PF350 off ebay, midwestspeakers. There are lots of places on line that sell the speaker, including ebay and reverb.com.
It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing.
User avatar
Mitch Druckman
Posts: 654
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 12:01 am
Location: Arizona, USA

Post by Mitch Druckman »

Has anyone tried the PF-350 in a Fender amp with a Strat or Tele?
Kenneth Kotsay
Posts: 953
Joined: 8 Jan 2000 1:01 am
Location: Davie/Ft Lauderdale, Florida
Contact:

Post by Kenneth Kotsay »

JON VOTH, how did it go with the installation regarding your 112? I have a 112 and I'm thinking of installing the PF 350 speaker.

Any noticeable difference between the original Peavey 112 speaker vs the PF305?

KEN
Jon Voth
Posts: 308
Joined: 12 Sep 2018 10:03 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Post by Jon Voth »

Yes, so as mentioned, it seemed fuller maybe, more lows.

I'm not seasoned much to describe characteristics, or even know what I'm looking for. And wish I could hear each back to back w/o taking time to switch it out.

But I like it.

For me, I couldn't get all the bolts in. I'd have to dremel the PF350 bolt holes inwards a bit. But no biggie.

But Ima take it out and try it in a Milkman 85W as soon as my cabinet gets built.
User avatar
Mike Holder
Posts: 794
Joined: 17 Dec 2002 1:01 am

Post by Mike Holder »

I’m using 2 PF-350’s in separate cabs but also trying one PF-350 & one PF-400 in a different scenario with many different head combos..ie; Twin, Boogie, Carvin etc. and they all sound great!.., love them!
I thought Nashville was the roughest, but I know I’ve said the same about them all.
I received my education, drivin through the Nation listenin to Paul!.. ( Franklin that is! )
User avatar
Dan Kelly
Posts: 626
Joined: 21 Aug 2014 8:40 am
Location: Boston, MA

Post by Dan Kelly »

I just got the PF-400 and I really like it. I was hoping for a little more low end, but the clarity and the detail of the sound is superb.
blah, blah, blah.
Hey You Kids! Get Off My Lawn!
blah, blah, blah.
Post Reply