The Steel Guitar Forum Store 

Post new topic Is There Enough Market For New Steel Companies?
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Is There Enough Market For New Steel Companies?
chris ivey


From:
california (deceased)
Post  Posted 6 Sep 2011 12:28 pm    
Reply with quote

i'm asking this because the steel community is limited to far less of a consumer base than guitars, for instance. after hearing many businessmen complain about this lack of potential customers.

lately we have jackson, show pro, justice, rains, rittenbury, russler (bad name choice),benrom, infinity, and other fairly new companies popping up.
i wouldn't think all these builders are doing it totally for the love of the art. who can make a profit off of this? especially when most have similar common design features. shouldn't new guitars offer new features and unique tonal offerings?

most of these look to be built well by craftsmen who have lots of pride. but how many people have $5000 or more to buy an unproven model?

open for discussion....
View user's profile Send private message

Dickie Whitley

 

Post  Posted 6 Sep 2011 1:29 pm    
Reply with quote

Chris, I agree that there seems to be a lot of new steel companies popping up. I also agree the the steel guitar market is small. If our market is indeed over saturated with manufacturers, it is almost certain that in the end only the best will survive. That will include the ones that can adapt to changing needs of the players quickly and with reasonable cost.

This next part is my rantings only. I think all steels need to come standard as either 3/5 or 4/5 as singles, and 8/5 as doubles. I also think that all should handle at least 3 raise and 3 lower at a minumum. Split tunings should be standard also. I don't think that's too much to ask for, but again just my 2 cents.
View user's profile Send private message

Bent Romnes


From:
London,Ontario, Canada
Post  Posted 6 Sep 2011 1:32 pm    
Reply with quote

Chris,
I find it totally pleasing that you include the BenRom name with all those well known names and established companies. I am hardly even a new company- just a retired fellow who wants a hobby and this happens to be steel guitar building. Like I stated on my web site
www.benrom.com , love does in fact have a lot to do with my building hobby.
I offer nothing new technically, just trying to perfect the old method.
I do believe that I have a new tonal offering however. Not sure how this came about but a few weeks ago, when David Hartley played "Blue", he also played two well known brands. Not only did the BenRom sound like a steel guitar should, it was also right up there in tone with the other 2. If that wasn't enough, it also sounded different.

So maybe "for the love of it" is partly correct. In any case I love what I'm doing Smile

I wouldn't pay $5000 for an unproven model either. But because my building is based on fun,love and hobby more than huge profits I can sell my product below that.
_________________
BenRom Pedal Steel Guitars
https://www.facebook.com/groups/212050572323614/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Brian Henry

 

Post  Posted 6 Sep 2011 1:35 pm    
Reply with quote

Chris, With the demise of Carter, there is a big gap especially since they were one of the big producers.
_________________
LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN GEORGIA
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Bent Romnes


From:
London,Ontario, Canada
Post  Posted 6 Sep 2011 1:36 pm    
Reply with quote

Dickie Whitley wrote:

This next part is my rantings only. I think all steels need to come standard as either 3/5 or 4/5 as singles, and 8/5 as doubles. I also think that all should handle at least 3 raise and 3 lower at a minumum. Split tunings should be standard also. I don't think that's too much to ask for, but again just my 2 cents.

Dickie, you and I think alike. My SD10 comes with 4/5, triple R/L and split tuners standard. I believe anything above a student model could and should have this as standard.
_________________
BenRom Pedal Steel Guitars
https://www.facebook.com/groups/212050572323614/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Tony Prior


From:
Charlotte NC
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 12:56 am    
Reply with quote

LONG sorry..may be worth the read...

Although I am an advocate for anyone attempting to take the plunge and join the PSG manufacturers market, the issue with regard to the PSG , first is always price for the typical consumer/player and then secondly it is the delivery schedule . Consumers want it now. I want it now...


Comparing PSG's to Guitars is not a fair comparison, I am looking at 3 premium Telecasters in my room and the three of them together cost what my "1" D10 did. These are not Chinese Telecasters, 3/52RI USA Guitars.

I am also looking at 3 recently purchased Acoustics, 2 Breedloves and a Taylor, all 3 of those ( 2 used ) came in at about 1/2 of what my D10 cost.

Then the bigger factor, on any good day, I can sell or trade any of the mentioned guitars above, that's not something we can do with the PSG. We can't wake up one morning and decide to sell or trade in ole' blue for the new model, not when we may have 4K ( or more ) invested in ole' blue and we can only get back 2K or less on the trade.

You cannot walk in to any Guitar Center and TRADE the PSG and get back anything close to it's real value. You can do that with a guitar any day of the week, any hour of the day.


So, where is this going ? Chris asks a very relevant question...and it's a good question...

Can PSG builders making a living at this ? Carter ( John Fabian RIP) used his engineering background and had parts manufactured by automated machining. But that required an up front investment on his part while keeping the consumer cost "somewhat" controlled and reasonable. At the same time he had the manufacturing time down to a science and that right there is the primary factor. He told me one time that he could build 1 D10 in a single work day, given everything went well in that day. Controlled quality parts cost and specific manufacturing time was the objective and goal . John was building 15 to 30 PSG's each month and delivering as many. We constantly read and hear that other premium builders are offering a year or more for a delivery. For me, personally, that makes me go to the used market.

I certainly understand the craftsmanship of such Instruments, Zum, Franklin, Emmons, MSA, etc..but I too wonder how a PSG builder can join the market, shipping 10 or 12 instruments in the course of one year. 10 x 5,000 is $50,000. Being a very small business owner , I would have to evaluate gross income vs inventory cost and labor time if the business was only going to gross $50K over the course of one year.

So perhaps, it is the love of the Instrument and craft after all.

And as Chris asks, how many of us have 5K ready to spend on a new PSG ?

New builders such as Jackson, Sho Pro,BenRom etc, I wish them the best going forward in this extremely tuff market which they are part of.


Sadly I have no plans to change my PSG, perhaps add a S10 one day to my collection maybe ,( very distant thought ) but being brutally honest, I would seek the used market first, which does nothing for a builder unless of course the person I buy from is making a new purchase.

When I think of a dedicated PSG builder, it makes me reflect on my many full time musician friends who for the most part are struggling for income and basically being supported by a great wife who has a good job with benefits ! I hope that's not the case for the PSG builders.
_________________
Emmons L-II , Fender Telecasters, B-Benders , Eastman Mandolin ,
Pro Tools 12 on WIN 7 !
jobless- but not homeless- now retired 9 years

CURRENT MUSIC TRACKS AT > https://tprior2241.wixsite.com/website
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Ken Byng


From:
Southampton, England
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 4:02 am    
Reply with quote

They obviously are surviving and are even coming up with new inovations, particularly the folks at Jackson. Show Pro and Jackson are offering what can only be best described as custom shop instruments from their professional range.

One thing to bear in mind - even though these manufacturers will list manufacturing and retailing as their core business, most still also provide a repair/restoration facility that generates them income.
_________________
Show Pro D10 - amber (8+6), MSA D10 Legend XL Signature - redburst (9+6), Sho-Bud Pro 111 Custom (8+6), Emmons black Push-Pull D10 (8+5), Zum D10 (8x8), Hudson pedal resonator. Telonics TCA-500, Webb 614-E,
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Tony Prior


From:
Charlotte NC
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 4:22 am    
Reply with quote

Ken Byng wrote:
They obviously are surviving and are even coming up with new innovations, particularly the folks at Jackson.


I suspect that is quite true but then we must consider MSA is said to be discontinuing the top of the line Steel.

It does get back to the initial question raised by Chris , how many of us are buying $5000 + Steels and how many of these excellent Instruments do the PSG makers need to sell to make a quality living and stay in business long term ? Of which I certainly do not know the answer but I suspect a quality builder with a couple of employees needs to sell more than a couple each month @ $5K or more each.
_________________
Emmons L-II , Fender Telecasters, B-Benders , Eastman Mandolin ,
Pro Tools 12 on WIN 7 !
jobless- but not homeless- now retired 9 years

CURRENT MUSIC TRACKS AT > https://tprior2241.wixsite.com/website


Last edited by Tony Prior on 7 Sep 2011 6:17 am; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Clete Ritta


From:
San Antonio, Texas
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 4:36 am     Re: Is There Enough Market For New Steel Companies?
Reply with quote

chris ivey wrote:
...shouldn't new guitars offer new features and unique tonal offerings?...

You mean like a built in programmable tuner!? Or perhaps 3 pickups, 5 pole selector, volume and tone controls like on the ol' Stratocaster? Hmmm. Thats all I can come up with this morning. There are certainly more than enough electronic gadgets nowadays to change "tone", yet more boutique brands keep popping up and reinventing old ones with clever new names.

I think competition in a niche industry is good whether there is a market or not. It promotes innovation. There are different options from the larger builders already. Keyless heads, swappable pickups, carbon, refinements to parts etc. The G2 has a new crossrod design which may not be considered a feature, or change the tone of one Mullen from another drastically, but it is an innovative change in their blueprint. The materials and mechanical functions have remained relatively the same over the years as Tony refers. Regardless of the differences in design and fabrication they all sound just like a steel guitar to the average listener. Pickup coil and height will vary tone to a degree, but the sound doesnt change all that much from one brand to the next these days IMO. Thats in the hands right? Laughing Many brands sound just fine to me but what makes one brand different from another isnt just the sound on top from the hands, but how it feels mechanically underneath to the feet and legs. The "action" so to speak. The topside is the same on all guitars to the player: ten strings stretched over a nut and bridge at a fixed distance. Thats the Steel or acoustic side of the instrument, and fairly universal. Some brands sound kinda similar when unplugged too haha. The Pedal part of the instrument is the mechanical sum of all the other parts underneath and including the changer that ultimately define how well the instrument works with the feet and knees. The finish and polishing on the outside look great but arent nearly as important as how the well the cabinet is built for its acoustic tone, the type of neck and, on Pedal Steel its whats under the hood that really counts for its playability.

New brands may hopefully promote new design innovations as of yet to come, and some may turn back to the past and offer the Stratocaster features (which havent changed in years) as if it were something new. Either way, new companies should strive to add something new and improved to the mix. It can only help promote and increase availability of the instrument. Also, as evidenced by Carter, nothing is permanent, and that unfortunately includes established steel builders. I suppose building steels and playing music are similar in that they are not always done for big profit, but can still be rewarding nonetheless. Very Happy

Clete


Last edited by Clete Ritta on 7 Sep 2011 4:44 am; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Jim Cohen


From:
Philadelphia, PA
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 4:42 am    
Reply with quote

Tony Prior wrote:
... we must consider MSA is said to be discontinuing the top of the line Steel. If this is true then that would suggest that MSA is sadly experiencing market pains, perhaps better defined as "market share" pains...

As far as I know they are only discontinuing production of the carbon-fiber (Millenium) model and it is not for reasons of market share, but rather for reasons of cost of goods. They continue to make the (wood-bodied) Legend and Studio Pro models, to my knowledge. Let's be careful not to start any rumors here...
_________________
www.JimCohen.com
www.RonstadtRevue.com
www.BeatsWalkin.com


Last edited by Jim Cohen on 7 Sep 2011 5:20 am; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Frank Freniere


From:
The First Coast
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 5:15 am    
Reply with quote

Tony Prior wrote:
You cannot walk in to any Guitar Center and TRADE the PSG and get back anything close to it's real value. You can do that with a guitar any day of the week, any hour of the day.


I must be going to wrong Guitar Center, or bringing the wrong guitars. I've never gotten anything close to a decent offer on a 6-string trade-in. They want CASH, baby, not more inventory.
View user's profile Send private message

Tony Prior


From:
Charlotte NC
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 6:16 am    
Reply with quote

Jim, not meant to cause a rumor, but rather an observation. Yes you are correct it is said to be discontinued due to costs . I have deleted the words from my initial OBSERVATIONS...thanks for that...

http://bb.steelguitarforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=209205


Frank Of course GC will not give you a great deal, but getting 60% of a $600 guitar ( new) ( $360) is a far cry from getting 50 or 60% of a $5000 Steel, that's what is implied...that's a $2500 or more loss...a player may consider selling a guitar to GC for a bit less than they could get outside as makes the total transaction easier, plus GC offers another 10% off on the purchase of a new axe with the trade... By the way GC is "all in" on the used market...they have a very extensive used market web site..over 51,000 used items available across the country. Cash is king for both new and used...


I suspect no card carrying member of the "PSG worth $4k or $5K" club is going to bring the axe in for a 50% trade value, too much invested, too much loss...relative value counts here, that's all I am implying.
_________________
Emmons L-II , Fender Telecasters, B-Benders , Eastman Mandolin ,
Pro Tools 12 on WIN 7 !
jobless- but not homeless- now retired 9 years

CURRENT MUSIC TRACKS AT > https://tprior2241.wixsite.com/website
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

b0b


From:
Cloverdale, CA, USA
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 6:32 am    
Reply with quote

The market is small, but most builders I've talked to aren't hurting for customers. There's still a healthy market for new steel guitars.

Dickie Whitley wrote:
This next part is my rantings only. I think all steels need to come standard as either 3/5 or 4/5 as singles, and 8/5 as doubles. I also think that all should handle at least 3 raise and 3 lower at a minumum. Split tunings should be standard also. I don't think that's too much to ask for, but again just my 2 cents.

I disagree. I believe that most people don't need a vertical knee lever. It's an expansion item. It should be an option on new guitars and builders should offer an "easy to install" vertical knee kit. That's my 2 cents worth. Mr. Green
_________________
-𝕓𝕆𝕓- (admin) - Robert P. Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Video
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Joseph Barcus

 

From:
Volga West Virginia
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 7:27 am    
Reply with quote

I think support should be on top of the list. long waiting on return calls, talked down to like you are a idiot that dont have a clue. and being lied to on the waiting time on your guitar seems to be the most complains on most builders today. I dont think someone should have to wait a year on something they want. I wont walk into a restaurant if I have to wait over 5 minutes. I figure if they wanted my money they would make it easier. there was only one builder that was able to to say to me I could have your guitar for you in 30 days and only one. the rest said long waiting 1 year or more then only to find out you are most likely being lied to and may not see your guitar in 1 1/2 year. so at this time I will stick to what I have and mod it as it needs it a lot cheaper in the long run, plenty of nice used guitars out there and one should not have to wait no more than 30 days and not get any lip back from the questions why is my guitar not done yet
_________________
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvuH7H8BajODaL_wy3_HSJQ
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Dickie Whitley

 

Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 7:39 am    
Reply with quote

Point taken, b0b. I respect your opinion, so we'll agree to disagree.
View user's profile Send private message

Geoff Cline


From:
Southwest France
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 8:07 am    
Reply with quote

Having worked with and represented (legally) luthiers for many years (although not PSG builders...yet), I think the key is what constitutes a "company?" The killer for most businesses, and particularly instrument building businesses, in my experience, is having overhead rise to a point that isn't sustainable when there is the inevitable lull in sales.

That said, small shops with talented craftspeople have been able to carve out a niche and survive economic downturns and other external events that negatively impact business (and considering most instrument purchases fall into "discretionary" rather than "work related tools" that is saying something). Another factor in this issue is the relative "conservatism" of guitar players (including PSG players) when it comes to new ideas or designs that deviate from the established brands/styles. It never ceases to amaze me how many musicians scoff at new designs because "it doesn't look like X" or "so & so didn't design it, so it can't be good" rather than using their ears, eyes, fingers, etc. to really try things. This issue has been vexing for my friends and clients for many years...and shows no signs of getting any better. Frustrating!

Finally, being a relative new comer to playing and owning pedal steels, I am amazed at the level of ingenuity and engineering involved in making these guitars play and sound like they do. To me, it falls somewhere between hot rod building and rocket science, with a large dose of alchemy, mojo and musicianship thrown in. Its tough enough to be financially successful when "all one has to do" is buy wood and parts, shape and finish and sell a guitar (note: I realize this is NO SMALL feat and don't mean to say or imply that it is easy at all), but when you add casting, machining and/or engineering, additional production costs, shipping costs and smaller market, I am mightily impressed with pedal steel builders/companies. Sure it is a business but it has to be a labor of love or a deep passion for the instruments and/or music/players...because there is no doubt that it is a tough row to hoe.

All luthiers have my deepest respect. I am a devotee and supporter of the craft ethic. For me, there can never be enough examples of this kind of dedication and work.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Kevin Hatton

 

From:
Buffalo, N.Y.
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 10:30 am    
Reply with quote

There is no appreciable return on building steel guitars. They take ALOT of time and the initial investment is enormous. You have to do it for the love.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Bent Romnes


From:
London,Ontario, Canada
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 11:13 am    
Reply with quote

Kevin, that's it in a nutshell. But I sure do love it!
_________________
BenRom Pedal Steel Guitars
https://www.facebook.com/groups/212050572323614/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

George Rozak


From:
Braidwood, Illinois USA
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 6:14 pm    
Reply with quote

I'd think that the fact that some builders have a 1 to 1 & 1/2 year waiting period for a new steel would indicate that there's a fairly strong market out there for new guitars.
_________________
Sho-Bud: Professional & Fingertip
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Bent Romnes


From:
London,Ontario, Canada
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 6:34 pm    
Reply with quote

Good point George.
If you build a quality product, they'll beat a path to your door.
Case in point: Eddie Fulawka has a 2 year wait.
_________________
BenRom Pedal Steel Guitars
https://www.facebook.com/groups/212050572323614/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Kevin Hatton

 

From:
Buffalo, N.Y.
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 7:30 pm    
Reply with quote

The fact that there is a one year wait has nothing to do with strong demand. MOST builders are a one man show. If you build two per month you can get to a one year wait fast. Overhead/parts are a big factor. Parts are VERY expensive.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

b0b


From:
Cloverdale, CA, USA
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 8:46 pm    
Reply with quote

If demand is strong enough to guarantee that you will be building guitars for at least a year into the future, that is a solid business in my opinion. Many businesses, even one-man ones, are at the mercy of month-to-month sales figures to meet their obligations. By contrast, steel guitar builders seem to have some degree of job security, even if they aren't getting rich at it.

That's just my view as an outsider, though. It takes a special talent to build steel guitars, and an additional talent to build a business. Lack of the latter could bring a fine craftsman to the brink of bankruptcy.
_________________
-𝕓𝕆𝕓- (admin) - Robert P. Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Video
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Per Berner


From:
Skovde, Sweden
Post  Posted 7 Sep 2011 10:01 pm    
Reply with quote

I believe there's always a market for low volume boutique manufacturers, but not necessarily a profitable market – a bit like the sportscar business. Every single supercar project is a loss-making affair: Development and materials costs are much higher than for a normal car, and prices ten to twenty times that of a normal car don't help when sales volumes are 1/10,000th. Volkswagen (Bugatti), Fiat (Ferrari), BMW etc. swallow these huge losses for PR reasons (and bragging rights, possibly), and then a big bunch of Brits in sheds think they too can succeed on shoestring budgets. Which they invariably do not.

For many small steel builders I suspect it is mostly a labor of love, pursuing a life-long hobby in retirement or as an extracurricular activity, or just barely making a living doing something you really like to do. I don't see how anyone could get rich building pedal steel guitars. They may think they are in profit, but that's probably because they are overlooking development and marketing costs and undervaluing their own time. If it were possible, Fender would still be making them, along with Gibson, Peavey and other major players.

By the way, I find this to be just the opposite:

"You cannot walk in to any Guitar Center and TRADE the PSG and get back anything close to it's real value. You can do that with a guitar any day of the week, any hour of the day. "

A regular guitar purchased new loses half its value when you walk out the shop door. A used pedal steel though, usually fetches near its original price. I've even been offered around $1,000 more for my Hybrid Zum than I paid...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Larry Waisner

 

Post  Posted 8 Sep 2011 2:01 am     Steel Guitar Market
Reply with quote

I believe that the steel guitar has evolved to a beautiful instrument. I also believe there are companys out there large and small that cut corners to produce a product cheaper which gives them more profit. One big issue I have is Bearings verses bushings. Every one knows the guitar plays smoother and sounds better with sealed bearings. but they continue to make bushings. Striker plates is another issue there are alot of PSG's made from big and small named companys producing guitars with stop screws stopping against wood on the under carriage instead of spending twenty five cents for a 1/16 inch thick aluminum plate screwed down under the floor pedal levers to have a solid stop for there screws and discontinue damaging the body of the guitar and cause tuning problems later on. I am a retired tool maker and a musician of fifty years with a small two man machine shop at my home and I certainly have considered manufacturing PSG's and I guarantee the level of mechanical engineering would continue to be at it's best and new design's to an old dog sometimes is in order. I believe Chuck Wright was a man way ahead of his time. He used machinist ideas and concepts in manufacturing that was quietly copied by other guitar makers. One of the first to make and use nylon bushings. In my mind there is nothing prettier than a maple body steel guitar with polished aluminum parts. They can still be produced folks at a competitive price. Just because America is running short on forestry produce there are other countries selling tiger, burl, quilted maple lumber for pennies on the dollar our closest is Canada. Well I will get off this milk crate and go back to playing my guitar.
Best Regards,
From the mountains in northern New Mexico,
Larry Waisner


Last edited by Larry Waisner on 8 Sep 2011 2:31 am; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message

Per Berner


From:
Skovde, Sweden
Post  Posted 8 Sep 2011 2:06 am    
Reply with quote

Bearings are intended for quickly rotating elements. For pedal steel applications, with very limited and slow movements, bushings actually do a better job at a much lower cost. Complication and expense doesn't always mean improvement!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website


All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  

Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction,
steel guitars & accessories

www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

Please review our Forum Rules and Policies

Steel Guitar Forum LLC
PO Box 237
Mount Horeb, WI 53572 USA


Click Here to Send a Donation

Email admin@steelguitarforum.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for
Band-in-a-Box

by Jim Baron
HTTP