| Author |
Topic: 2 lap steels into a single input amp. |
Paul DiMaggio
From:
Fort Nelson, British Columbia, Canada
|
Posted 31 Oct 2009 7:49 am |
|
| As I wait patiently for my new Allen Melbert 8 string to arrive,I have been contemplating building a stand to accommodate both the A-M and my Morrell 6 string.I only have a single input on my amp but would like to have both guitars plugged in at the same time.Does anyone know of a device that would work without compromising the tone or volume of either guitar? It would help if it didn't cost an arm and a leg also. |
|
|
|
Keith Cordell
From:
San Diego
|
Posted 31 Oct 2009 8:30 am
|
|
| Do you want to play them both at the same time? I use an A/B box so I can play my two steels into one amp, I just use the footswitch to change instruments. |
|
|
|
John Billings
From:
Ohio, USA
|
Posted 31 Oct 2009 8:42 am
|
|
| I had one called an A-B-Y box. Can't recall the maker. Allowed one, or the other, and both. I traded it away and now use a Boss LS-2. Great pedal. Does a multitude of tasks, but I'm not sure if it would fit your needs. Look for an A-B--Y box. |
|
|
|
Paul DiMaggio
From:
Fort Nelson, British Columbia, Canada
|
Posted 31 Oct 2009 8:57 am
|
|
| No,I don't think I'll be playing them both at the same time. |
|
|
|
John Billings
From:
Ohio, USA
|
Posted 31 Oct 2009 9:37 am
|
|
| How about building the switching into the stand you're making? |
|
|
|
Blake Wilson
From:
Boulder CO, USA
|
|
|
|
John Billings
From:
Ohio, USA
|
Posted 31 Oct 2009 10:41 am
|
|
| That's the one I had! Now I can stop trying to remember the brand name! |
|
|
|
Keith Cordell
From:
San Diego
|
Posted 31 Oct 2009 10:42 am
|
|
| Before you go with an A/B/Y instead of an A/B, keep in mind that you can easily turn on both guitars, or turn them off, inadvertently with the Y function added. With an A/B switch you get one side or the other, failproof. Morley's pedal tends to pop when you step on it; Radial makes a good one, or you can go the route I did and get a DOD switch for about $10 on Ebay- and mine is dead quiet. |
|
|
|
Paul DiMaggio
From:
Fort Nelson, British Columbia, Canada
|
Posted 31 Oct 2009 12:44 pm
|
|
Thanks for all the suggestions,now at least, I know what to look for.
Good idea John.I am going to have compartments for a chromatic tuner and tone bars etc. One more spot won't be hard to incorporate. |
|
|
|
Alan Brookes
From:
Brummy living in Southern California
|
Posted 31 Oct 2009 6:38 pm
|
|
| Most amps with two inputs also have two input volume controls. In that case just leave them both plugged in and turn down the volume on the one not being played. |
|
|
|
Harry Dietrich
From:
Robesonia, Pennsylvania, USA, R.I.P.
|
Posted 31 Oct 2009 9:55 pm
|
|
You could always get one of these. They work great, and they're cheap.
_________________
I almost had a psychic girlfriend, but she left me before we met. |
|
|
|
John Bechtel
From:
Nashville, Tennessee, R.I.P.
|
Posted 31 Oct 2009 11:22 pm
|
|
Harry; That's the quickest and probably the cheapest way to go! (Under $3) I also use the Y-plug to give my old Fender V~T Pedal 2-Outputs to 2-Amps.!
_________________
<marquee> Go~Daddy~Go, (No), Go, It's your Break Time</marquee> L8R, jb
My T-10 Remington Steelmaster |
|
|
|
Ulric Utsi-Åhlin
From:
Sweden
|
Posted 1 Nov 2009 1:02 am
|
|
LEHLE is the king of switchers,and the model to look
into for this app´´ would be the LEHLE 3@1 SGOS...
3 instruments into 1 amp,or 1 of 2 amps if You
hook up for it...great.McUtsi |
|
|
|
Keith Cordell
From:
San Diego
|
Posted 1 Nov 2009 5:09 am
|
|
| You're right, Ulric- but they cost about $350 here. I could buy a guitar with that. |
|
|
|
Peter Jacobs
From:
Northern Virginia
|
|
|
|
George Keoki Lake
From:
Edmonton, AB., Canada
|
Posted 1 Nov 2009 7:02 am
|
|
The splitter HARRY has shown (above) is almost identical to the one I occasionally use, with two differences...mine has two 'roller' volume controls ... one for each input. In other words, one guitar can be set louder (or quieter) than the other. I'm not sure if this item is still available.
It works great ! |
|
|
|
Keith Cordell
From:
San Diego
|
Posted 1 Nov 2009 7:10 am
|
|
| If you get a chance, George, I'd like to see a picture of that circuit and the rollers. Sounds like a worthy project. |
|
|
|
Paul DiMaggio
From:
Fort Nelson, British Columbia, Canada
|
Posted 1 Nov 2009 8:41 am
|
|
I talked to one of our local metal type players,who has a dizzying array of electronic gadgetry and asked about the Y splitter and he said he has never used one like Harry showed but he has used one made from cables.He said that he lost some volume from both guitars when he used it the way I want to. Now, volume to him and volume to me are really 2 different things.
Anyone else notice anything like that? |
|
|
|
John Billings
From:
Ohio, USA
|
Posted 1 Nov 2009 8:49 am
|
|
Use a switch. Just a simple "Y" chord might cause some signal degradation through "loading" I would think. But, I'm not sure, and even if it does, you might not mind it. Double-neck pedal guitars and non-pedal guitars use switches.
The steel manufacturer that I worked for, used a three position switch. And in the middle position, with both necks turned on, there was a very significant change in tone. Much thinner, loss of low-end.
But, ya can try a "Y" cord, or a splitter like Harry's. It's a cheap experiment. |
|
|
|
Alan Brookes
From:
Brummy living in Southern California
|
Posted 1 Nov 2009 11:36 am
|
|
The cheapest way is to pull one plug out and plug the other in. In my den, where I record, I used to have all sorts of switchgear, so that I could switch any input into any output through any processor. It got so complex that I needed a spiral binder to keep notes on the setup. Ultimately I got fed up of the whole thing, got a Dymo labeller, and wrapped labels around the plug leads saying where the lead came from or went to. Now I just plug them in as necessary. Cheap and effective, and a lot less confusing.  |
|
|
|
George Keoki Lake
From:
Edmonton, AB., Canada
|
Posted 1 Nov 2009 11:42 am
|
|
| Well Keith, being a total computer illiterate, I haven't a clue as to how to post a pic on the Forum. Suffice to say, the splitter I have is identical to Harry's. Just picture in your mind two slots in line with the inputs, and the vol controls are there. If you have a computer mouse with a 'wheel' on it, very similar. |
|
|
|
John Billings
From:
Ohio, USA
|
Posted 1 Nov 2009 1:04 pm
|
|
I think these simple signal splitters are not often used because of loss of "tone." I've been looking on the net, and most of what I've found out about "signal loading" has been in reference to stompbox effects not being true bypass..
Again, I worked for a steel manufacturing company. I did most of the assembly, including the wiring. But I'm no tech. We used a three position ,0n-on-0n switch for the neck selectors on double-necked guitars. This is the same situation as yours. One switch position gave one neck, the opposite switch position gave the other neck. The position in the middle gave both necks on. So,,,, With the E9th neck on, it sounded "normal. With the switch positioned to turn on the C6th neck, that neck sounded "normal. But,,, with the switch in the middle,"both necks on" position, the tone of each neck was VERY different. We used that position to get a more classic "West Coast" sound. That sound was definitely "thinner."
The problem will be(I believe, but I'm no tech) that each guitar will "see" and be influenced by the other guitar's electronics, the pickup, the pots, tone caps. This most likely will change the output signal impedance, resulting in "tone suck."
But,,, having said all that, I'm not 100% sure that will happen, and I'm not sure if it would actually matter to you. I don't know what kind of music you play. And there are ways to compensate, such as your amp settings. But a simple splitter, or Y cord, does mean that both "necks" will be on at the same time. You'll have to use your volume controls to turn them on and off. There's a definite reason that players use stompboxes to directly bypass effects, tuners and the other instruments they have onstage. And that reason is that the switch boxes, like the Morley, completely isolate one electronic device from others. |
|
|
|
John Billings
From:
Ohio, USA
|
Posted 1 Nov 2009 1:18 pm
|
|
| You mentioned that you're building a stand for your guitars, with places for different things. If it were me, I think I'd put two input jacks close to the output jacks of your guitars, and use short patch cords to plug your guitars into your stand. Run wires from those jacks to the switch, and from the output of the switch to another output jack for your cord to the amp. Really pretty simple and slick. Nothing extra underfoot. Don't have to crane your neck around to make sure you're stompin' the right switch. Nothin' extra to carry around. No fiddlin' with the volume settings every time you switch from one to the other. Etc., etc.. |
|
|
|
John Billings
From:
Ohio, USA
|
|
|
|
D Schubert
From:
Columbia, MO, USA
|
Posted 1 Nov 2009 1:27 pm
|
|
I use a Snapjack cord every Saturday night, with an extra "jack" for every instrument I'm going to play through my amp. Easy to use and understand, dead silent when connected and disconnected, no tone loss, etc.
http://www.zzyzxsnapjack.com/std-snapjack.html |
|
|
|
