Page 1 of 2

Steel as the band's only lead instrument

Posted: 5 Apr 2004 2:35 pm
by Doug Jones
For the last several months when we play smaller venues I end up as the only lead instrument in the band. We have bass, drums, lady singer and just me. Otherwise, we hire a guitarist, but it seems I end up carrying the whole lead section. I don't mind the extra $$$, but I do get tired of playing rhythm steel, padding, filling, etc.all the time. How many of you players play with just bass and drums and how do you feel about it?

Posted: 5 Apr 2004 2:39 pm
by Smiley Roberts
Been there,done that HATE it!!

------------------
<font face="monospace" size="3"><pre> ~ ~
©¿© It don't mean a thang,
mm if it ain't got that twang.
www.ntsga.com</pre></font>



Posted: 5 Apr 2004 3:40 pm
by Paddy Long
I have the best of both worlds - drums, bass and Piano/harp but no lead guitarist to compete with - just really cool !

Posted: 5 Apr 2004 4:27 pm
by Billy Easton
I've been doing this for years with our group "3 Wheel Drive". I never have to fight with the lead picker over tuning!! Image It is a lot of work, but I don't mind. I also sing a few tunes, as well as harmony on most songs. Keeps me busy.

------------------
Billy Easton
Casa Grande, AZ
Southwestern Steel Guitar Association



Posted: 5 Apr 2004 4:38 pm
by Earnest Bovine
I like it!

Posted: 5 Apr 2004 4:46 pm
by Bill Hatcher
I saw Julian Tharpe play in a disco/rock band in the 70s. Just him and a bass player and a drummer--amazing!!
No problem for a good steel player to really shine in a trio situation. You will be a better player for it.

Posted: 5 Apr 2004 5:38 pm
by Roger Edgington
Did it for years. I enjoy it as long as there is a strong singer, bass and drums. I would rather do it that way than fight another weak or out of tune lead player. It pushes you to be creative so the songs don't all sound the same. A wide variety of material also helps. But right now, I'm enjoying a full band with parts worked out.

Posted: 5 Apr 2004 5:50 pm
by Ed Altrichter
What, no fiddle ?????

Posted: 5 Apr 2004 6:17 pm
by Tim Rowley
I have a "classic country" gig every Sunday evening where I play steel as the only lead instrument. Like Doug says, you've gotta have something going almost all the time; rhythm, padding, fills, licks, intros, turnarounds, solos. After all, it's all dance music and this group plays a lot of requests. Yes, it's hard tiring work and I could see where the listeners could get tired of hearing so much steel. But they don't seem to grow weary of it at all. As a matter of fact, several people have told me that they travelled a long distance just to hear what we're doing and to dance. We get a lot of compliments from the crowd. Other area musicians constantly drop by to sit in with us and that's a BIG compliment.

Since this job allows me some freedom to experiment while I play, I feel like it helps me with my chops and my tone too. A lot of the tunes we play have the standard "cliche" licks that need to be played, but I try to keep from sounding too trite. I'm finding ways to change things around a bit to keep it interesting and still stay within the required framework of the song. It's a challenge but I've got a good-sounding guitar and the drummer follows me real well with little pushes and kicks. We stay alert to one another and are able to get a fairly "big" sound. The club owner is a young guy, he is behind us 100% and does a good job of advertising on our behalf. Nobody's complaining. Actually we have a lot of fun this way. It makes the hard work worthwhile.

Tim Rowley

Posted: 5 Apr 2004 6:25 pm
by Rich Weiss
I think it helps to be able to break up the sound, using effects, so that it doesn't sound like pedal steel on each song. Using chorus, and rotary and distortion, etc, can be effective to add sonic variety to different songs.

Posted: 5 Apr 2004 7:03 pm
by Al Marcus
I played a lot of jobs as the only lead instrument with just Bass and Drums.

Sometimes as a duo with just Bass.We all did a lot of singing too.

I had a Pe jr for the organ effect to switch the sound once in a while.

Sometimes ,It was nice not to buck some of those overplaying lead Guitar players....al Image Image Image

------------------
My Website..... www.cmedic.net/~almarcus/


Posted: 6 Apr 2004 4:09 am
by Robert Thomas
All my years of playing, starting in 1950 into the 80's, I was the lead player on steel, with drums, bass and singer playing rythum guitar. It was a lot of work, but I learned a lot and had a lot of fun not having to compete. It made it very easy to learn songs and where we were going with any given song. We developed a sense of knowing where each person was going and knew we could depend on their doing what they were supposed to do.

Posted: 6 Apr 2004 4:34 am
by Ernie Pollock
I really don't mind doing that if I have a Unversal S-12 to do it with, seems like its much easier with the 12 string with all the extra rhythm thangs you can do with it without switching to another neck. I had a group back in the 80's with just bass guitar, drums & steel - must admit I learned a bunch playing like that. But I would rather play with a lead guitar or keyboard player to tell the truth. I am doing a church group with just 2 rhythm guitar players right now, its a lot of fun, but it keeps ya on yer toes, thats for sure.

Ernie Pollock Image

------------------

Posted: 6 Apr 2004 6:18 am
by Ray Montee
Years ago, it would have been a strong rhythm guitar, soft bass, steel. Vocalist would not appear unless playing an instrument
which usually was the rhythm guitar.
I still find it difficult in my old age to understand why LEAD drums have been installed inplace of the chord-playing and music enhancing guitar and then using a guy with a $4,000 steel to slap rhythm all night.
It's amazing what progress has been made during these years since the 1980's. I wouldn't play that gig!<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Ray Montee on 06 April 2004 at 07:20 AM.]</p></FONT>

Posted: 6 Apr 2004 7:53 am
by Sonny Priddy
I Played At A Place A Few Weeks Ago And The Lead Man Was Out And I Had To Do It All. I Realy Don't Like To Do That. SONNY.

------------------

Posted: 6 Apr 2004 7:56 am
by Dave Van Allen
It's one of my favorite things to do.

I like the challenge.

Posted: 6 Apr 2004 8:52 am
by Walter Stettner
Personally I like thechallenge, it's also good practice, although it really makes you tired to be "on the spot" all night.

I also can understand the audience, sometimes they seem to get a little bored if only one instrument is doing all lead parts and lots of rhythm...

Kind Regards, Walter
www.austriansteelguitar.at.tf

------------------

Posted: 6 Apr 2004 11:04 am
by Joerg Hennig
I am doing just that right now and while it sounds OK on some tunes, on others it gets boring after a while, it would be so much nicer to have another lead instrument to share solos and fills with. We have several tunes that call for that twang that only a Tele can deliver... After all, what really counts is the sound of the band as a whole. We have been looking for a competent lead guitarist for some time now but it´s not easy, especially in this part of the world, to find someone who fits in with what we are doing (imagine a cross between Waylon and David Nelson and a little bit of James Burton for good measure) and also personality-wise, you know, someone who doesn´t just let his ego hang out and overplays all the time, I guess this has been discussed here before. Most sixstringers around here are either pure rock players who put distortion on everything, or super technical country players, which we are not.
Well, I just heard a guy has called who wants to audition at tomorrow´s rehearsal...

Regards, Joe H.

Posted: 6 Apr 2004 11:51 am
by Emmett Roch
I've had to do it, don't really care for it. But I've heard it done by Ricky Davis and Rick Price and it was pretty dang nice to listen to.

Posted: 6 Apr 2004 11:52 am
by David Spires
I enjoy being the only lead instrument too... I have worked several duo / trio things, and it really forces you to be creative when you are the only lead instrument. It's a challenge, and it even forces you to put the bar down every once in a while! It's all about contrast. I find that I go through a lot more tones and "sounds" in that kind of gig too - chorus / overdrive / distortion / dobro-sound / wet and pad-like / twangy & telecaster-like, etc.

Or, maybe I just love listening to myself?!

(I am kidding.)

I'll also agree that it makes the job more tiring, and gives you less time to look for attractive, female members of the audience.

David Spires

Posted: 6 Apr 2004 1:35 pm
by Darrell Klein
When I was younger, I played steel with just a rythmn player. I started out with nothing and I still have most of it!!!!!!!!!
Things are probably more like they are right
now, than they have ever been. I worked hard and finally got my head together,now
my body is falling apart. Regards, Darrell

Posted: 6 Apr 2004 2:11 pm
by Rick Schmidt
If the rhythm section is good, it can be fun.
As far as the audience is concerned?

I've suffered for MY music, so now it's THEIR turn. Image

Posted: 6 Apr 2004 2:25 pm
by frank rogers
Rick, right on target! But, as you know, that can be a BIG if.

Posted: 6 Apr 2004 3:31 pm
by Kenny Yates
Did that many a time....it's the only way to fly, and you don't have anyone else to blame.

Posted: 6 Apr 2004 5:28 pm
by Joe Miraglia
Having it all your self is fun ,always having to think and play,it's work, I've been there . You do learn a lot.But it's just as hard to play and just as much fun with other leads insturments.Knowing when to play and not to play.tean work and not trying to be a one man band.I work with a 6 pcs. band, Lead guitar and keys. If I over played like some players I woudn't be with the band very long. As it is I've been with them for 3 years. And the band is picking more songs that use more steel on them...We all get our turn to play. And you know it's a good feeling when someone says--I want to hear more Steel Guitar--And the lead singer Says --take it away Joe Image. Joe