Author |
Topic: Alternative to the POD |
James Mayer
From: back in Portland Oregon, USA (via Arkansas and London, UK)
|
Posted 6 Oct 2006 1:56 pm
|
|
Have any of you ever tried one of these for steel?
Zoom G9.2tt
Listen to this clip |
|
|
|
Keith Cordell
From: San Diego
|
Posted 7 Oct 2006 6:01 pm
|
|
They sound extremely brittle and digital- not at all like a POD. That being said, most steel players these days LIKE that sound, so you never know. |
|
|
|
James Mayer
From: back in Portland Oregon, USA (via Arkansas and London, UK)
|
Posted 7 Oct 2006 9:16 pm
|
|
Interesting, I just picked one up with a 45 day evaluation period. After only having spent a few hours with it, I would have to strongly disagree with your statement.
I have a POD XTL and it can't handle high frequencies well at all. I get fizz on any fender model I try if I play too hard. Also, my hollow-body electric that I use for rockabilly and surf gets really harsh sounds out of the pod unless I roll off the highs which kills the tone.
The Zoom G9 doesn't have these problems. It's has much more headroom and is makes the pod seem muffled in comparison.
However, I am having a hard time getting that classic fender tone on the zoom that I can get on the pod......albeit with the above flaws. The zoom fender twin model sounds more like the pod's roland Jazz amp to me.
|
|
|
|
James Mayer
From: back in Portland Oregon, USA (via Arkansas and London, UK)
|
|
|
|