The Steel Guitar Forum Store 

Post new topic Session 400 Adding Eff. Loops
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  Session 400 Adding Eff. Loops
Bill Paisley

 

From:
Athens, TN, USA
Post  Posted 17 Jan 2005 7:00 am    
Reply with quote

I have an early 80s model Session 400, and was wandering if it's possible to add effects loops to the circuit. Bill Paisley

[This message was edited by Bill Paisley on 17 January 2005 at 07:02 AM.]

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

jim milewski

 

From:
stowe, vermont
Post  Posted 17 Jan 2005 1:35 pm    
Reply with quote

I added one to my Session 400, right after the first transistor on the "out side" of the coupling capacitor, really can't say it made much of a difference though, maybe I should have done it just a little further down the line
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Gary Carriger

 

From:
Victoria, Texas
Post  Posted 17 Jan 2005 4:42 pm    
Reply with quote

Bill,
I have a '73 Session 400...and while I had in back at Peavy for some other repairs had them remove the spring reverb circuitry and add a pre-amp send and return. It can be done...but I can't tell you how.
Gary
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Ken Fox


From:
Nashville GA USA
Post  Posted 19 Jan 2005 12:12 pm    
Reply with quote

I got this idea from another Forum member. You could easily add a "preamp out"
and "power amp in" to the amp. The preamp out put can be picked up right from
the cable that plugs into to power amp board. Without adding any holes to the
amp you take advantage of input jack # 2 and use that as the preamp out, then
route the signal back to the jack on the back that was a "booster amp" jack (a
sample signal from the final output stages is there now, seldom used). A
"power amp" in jack could be located there (a jack with normally closed
swithing contacts that allows the preamp signal to pass to the power amp when
nothing is plugged in there.


View user's profile Send private message

Bill Paisley

 

From:
Athens, TN, USA
Post  Posted 20 Jan 2005 9:21 pm    
Reply with quote

Ken,thanks for the article. That sounds like a good solution. Bill Paisley
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Dennis Detweiler


From:
Solon, Iowa, US
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2005 6:22 am    
Reply with quote

If you were wishing to patch the session 400 into a tube head for added amplification, would it be best to add a "preamp out", or just use the existing "booster amp" output? Or, maybe add a "line out"?
I think the "booster amp" output was made to add a slave head. But, the signal was a little stout if I recall?
DD
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Brad Sarno


From:
St. Louis, MO USA
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2005 8:19 am    
Reply with quote

Hey Ken, you could just use the booster jack and use a stereo jack for send/return and make a simple Y-cable for the FX loop. It may keep the hookup neater. My gripe with FX loops is that you send the entire signal thru an FX unit often subjecting it to crappy electronics and also mediocre A/D and D/A conversion. In a Session 400, that discrete signal path is so pure you'd almost hate to pollute it with cheap signal path and digtal crud. The parallel sidechain FX buss like the way the spring reverb gets mixed back in is a cool way to go for FX because you preserve the pure path. Maybe working the loop into the reverb send/return path is a better mod. Just a thought.

Brad
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Bill Paisley

 

From:
Athens, TN, USA
Post  Posted 21 Jan 2005 11:57 am    
Reply with quote

I don't know if I was clear on what I wanted to use the Loop for. Mainly to just patch in my volume control or a digital delay. I assume the send should be right after the preamp stage.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Ken Fox


From:
Nashville GA USA
Post  Posted 22 Jan 2005 8:32 am    
Reply with quote

ACCORDING TO THE OLD SESSION 400 MANUAL IT IS A 1 VOLT SIGNAL LOOKING FOR A MINIMUM 10k OHM INPUT IMPEDANCE. IT IS UNBALANCED, SO YOU MIGHT GET SOME GROUND LOOP HUM

View user's profile Send private message

Ken Fox


From:
Nashville GA USA
Post  Posted 22 Jan 2005 8:37 am    
Reply with quote

My experience is the preamp signal is usually to hot for a volume pedal. The pedal loop on a Nashville is quite a few gain stages back. For the Nashville 400:

Patch output is 0.2 volts at 1k ohms or greater

Patch input is 0.2 volts 220K ohms

[This message was edited by Ken Fox on 22 January 2005 at 09:26 AM.]

View user's profile Send private message

rpetersen


From:
Iowa
Post  Posted 22 Jan 2005 6:47 pm    
Reply with quote

Brad - I have a 75 session 400 without a reverb tank - Are you saying that I could use the in and out of the reverb patch to put in something like an RV3 - and would I have to know which was in an out?????

------------------
Ron Petersen &
The Keep'n Tyme Band
Mullen Universal 12 - 1975 Session 400 - Nashville 1000


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Dennis Detweiler


From:
Solon, Iowa, US
Post  Posted 30 Jan 2005 6:46 pm    
Reply with quote

The input impedance on my Peavey Classic 50/50 is 250K ohms. The minimum input level is 1V RMS, 0 dBV. Can I patch from the Booster Amp output on my old Session 400 into the Classic 50/50?
Thanks
Dennis
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Dennis Detweiler


From:
Solon, Iowa, US
Post  Posted 30 Jan 2005 7:14 pm    
Reply with quote

Scratch my last post. I found the info in searching previous posts.
DD
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail


All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  

Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction,
steel guitars & accessories

www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

Please review our Forum Rules and Policies

Steel Guitar Forum LLC
PO Box 237
Mount Horeb, WI 53572 USA


Click Here to Send a Donation

Email admin@steelguitarforum.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for
Band-in-a-Box

by Jim Baron
HTTP