Page 1 of 1
George L cables
Posted: 6 Jan 2004 5:15 am
by Mike Kowalik
After reading the post about cables in the Steel Players section I think I will switch to george L's....but I'm wondering if the diameter will matter? Anyone have any feedback regarding the .155 and the .225 diameters?
Posted: 6 Jan 2004 10:53 am
by Bill Ferguson
As I understand from George Lewis, this is the same wire with a different jacket. I stopped stocking the larger diameter and only sell the .155 now. That's all I get calls for as it lays flatter on the floor.
Bill
Posted: 6 Jan 2004 11:36 am
by b0b
Moved to Electronics section
Posted: 6 Jan 2004 11:50 am
by jim milewski
I like the thinner, they wind up nice and look better, would guess the sound integrity is good
Posted: 6 Jan 2004 6:23 pm
by chas smith
I have a bunch of them and I love them. Also, besides being compact and easy to make, they sound really good.
Posted: 6 Jan 2004 9:07 pm
by MALCOLM KIRBY
.155 doesn't take up much room in your
pack-a-seat. Makes more room for those other necessities
For guitar players: .155 is great for patchwork on pedal boards & racks.
Posted: 6 Jan 2004 9:11 pm
by Ron Randall
Like others have said, the thin ones lay flat, and wind up nicely. I like the red wire so people can see them. That is all I use now, as I heard a real difference one day.
Posted: 7 Jan 2004 2:16 am
by CrowBear Schmitt
i use the 155 for my steel rig and a 225 for my guitar
great cables
Posted: 7 Jan 2004 12:43 pm
by Morton Kellas
Both cables are very good. I can hear a difference in the sound between the .155 and .225 . The .225 seems to have less low end loss. I spoke in length with Randy Beavers at the Norwalk show. Randy told me that he and Johnny Cox compared the two types and there was a definite difference in tone that they both could hear. Randy prefers the .225 . I guess the best choice would depend opon the equipment you are using and what tone you prefer. Try then both if possible.