| Author |
Topic: L.A. 400 versus Nashville 400 |
James Ingram
From:
Blue Springs, MO, USA
|
Posted 20 Nov 2002 3:08 pm |
|
| i,ve got chance to get good buy on peavey l.a. 400 amp with b/w speaker with foot switches. being new to psg i don,t own dedicated amp for psg as of yet. but for 200.00 i think i,ll hate myself if i don,t buy it. i read some use nashville 400. was wondering if l.a 400 would get job done. it,d be just stay home practice amp . any input appreciated. Thanks James |
|
|
|
Darvin Willhoite
From:
Roxton, Tx. USA
|
Posted 21 Nov 2002 11:31 am
|
|
I used an LA400 for a couple of years, and I liked the steel sound I got. I play at Church, and use a Digitech 2112 processer / preamp, I then went to a direct box which split out a balanced output to the house system. I went from the direct box to the LA400 for my monitor.
This amp had way more than plenty of power in this situation. The amp is a little smaller than a Nashville, but it's probably as heavy as one. I also played lead guitar which also sounded good through it. About 6 months ago I went to in-ear monitors and so I don't use an amp at all anymore.
------------------
Darvin Willhoite
Riva Ridge Recording
|
|
|
|
James Ingram
From:
Blue Springs, MO, USA
|
Posted 21 Nov 2002 4:28 pm
|
|
| Thanks for input. one difference i noticed right off about 2 amps was. l.a. doesn.t have frequency cutoff control like most steel amps do. james |
|
|
|
Mike Brown
From:
Meridian, Mississippi USA
|
Posted 22 Nov 2002 7:45 am
|
|
| The L.A. 400 was a very powerful amp in a small package. Thanks for your support. |
|
|
|
James Ingram
From:
Blue Springs, MO, USA
|
Posted 22 Nov 2002 8:14 pm
|
|
| mr. brown i plan to keep supporting peaveys amps. i,ve owned 3 in past. never had a bit of trouble out of any of 3. that,s why i,ll go with peavey amp for psg. their great amps.they,re like energizer bunny just keep on going.keep up good work and best for future for peavey. james |
|
|
|
