John,
Very respectfully, I rest my case! I still do NOT know how to do it!
well maybe I do!!
When I used to service amps, I used an oscilloscope and dummy load resistor (100w's) along with feeding a 1KHz signal in until the ouput stages began to clip to determine maximum power handling capability. I never used it to set the bias. Not saying I shouldn't have. Just never did.
But this afternoon I been doing just a whole lot of thinking about it. And while I don't service amps any more, I believe I may know how the factory did it even though (to my knowledge) they never told us exactly how.
Most quality power amps use Push-Pull stages in some configuration. The Fender Twin reverb uses four tubes in a parallel push-pull manner. That is by using two tubes in each half they doubled the amount of current which doubled the power (minus any inherrent losses).
A known problem with ANY push-pull setup is a thing called "crossover distortion". That is a distortion caused by the fact that when a P-P tube starts conducting current it is NOT linear for the initial part of the signal.
IF something is NOT done to counteract this, it causes a major and hearable distortion. In other words LOoooooow fidelity!
The bias on output stages determines the point where a tube operates. In P-P circuits both tube are cutoff with no signal by the bias setting. As a signal comes in to these tubes one of the tubes(s) is driven further into cut-off and the other one is driven to drawing current. As the signal changes polarity, the opposite is true. The bias setting establishes the point where they crossover so to speak.
As I look back now, I serviced amps before getting my real electronic's education. I feel now, I was over looking the obvious. If I had to do it over again. I would use the same setup and adjust the bias for the least amount of "crossover" distortion.
Note: this distortion is also minimized by special feedback circuits as well. But that is fixed and has no bearing on this post.
If you are thoroughly confused, welcome to the club,
carl
PS. Very respectfully, with the lone exception of the 110V AC power line section of the older Fender amps, I know of NO lethal voltages in the amp. If it was the case, I would have been dead a long long time ago. I admit when you do touch DC plate supply voltages you will wish you were dead (for a few moments
), but they are still quite safe relative to the 110VAC circuit where we are talking very high amperage capability versus a very LOW DC amperage capability in plate voltage supply circuits.
Remember it is the current that kills, NOT the voltage. The current is what goes through you. NOT the voltage. The DC plate supply section would load down very fast trying to send enough current through a reasonably healthy person to be lethal.
NOT so with 110VAC. That is a horse of another color!! And if it was 220VAC, you usually do not get a second chance!!
Let me leave you with an example that should spell it out quite clearly. In most TV's the Picture tube anode voltage is extremely high. in some cases 25,000 volts or higher. I have accidently touched this many many times. I agree it will wake you up in a hurry. But I have never known it to kill any body in over 34 yrs with RCA. And our techs got hit with it all the time!
On the other hand, people get killed all the time with simple 110VAC!!
What's the big difference? Simply this. The 110VAC can and WILL shove 15-30 amps through you if you are well grounded! That my friends will kill you!!
Plate voltage supplies even those with 400V + to 600V + DC capability and Picture tube anode supplies in the 25,000 DCV capability just do NOT have the ability to deliver even an amp of current. And milliamps (which is all the capability they have really) is not sufficient to be lethal.
If it were, there would have been many a dead amplifier repair technician in the last 50 yrs. Fortunately that has not happened because of the above. When you work on it, you get hit with it all the time. NO way around it.<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by C Dixon on 08 May 2001 at 09:08 PM.]</p></FONT>