Ideal string spacing for non tapered 8 string pedal steel?

Instruments, mechanical issues, copedents, techniques, etc.

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

Post Reply
Paul Leoni
Posts: 121
Joined: 8 May 2020 10:02 am
Location: Mississippi, USA

Ideal string spacing for non tapered 8 string pedal steel?

Post by Paul Leoni »

Subject says it all.
Would also like to know the industry average, and all of your thoughts on tapering in general. It would seem to me that a certain "magic" intonation spot would occur on some spacings with bar slants.
A lot to think about here
Last edited by Paul Leoni on 30 Jun 2021 4:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Paul Leoni
Posts: 121
Joined: 8 May 2020 10:02 am
Location: Mississippi, USA

Post by Paul Leoni »

I am thinking 5/16 is a good place and parts are available. The "slant" thing takes a back seat. Not sure how slant chord intonation is affected at 5/16ths. I made my 8 string straight steel 3/8 and there seem to be advantages, but what is important to me here is player comfort level when switching to another steel.
User avatar
richard burton
Posts: 3846
Joined: 23 Jan 2001 1:01 am
Location: Britain

Post by richard burton »

5/16" at the changer is too narrow.
11/32" at the changer is the proven ergonomic, industry standard, spacing.

I have no idea why the strings are tapered down to the nut, maybe it's an aesthetic thing.
User avatar
Ian Rae
Posts: 5826
Joined: 10 Oct 2013 11:49 am
Location: Redditch, England
Contact:

Post by Ian Rae »

I've always thought it was aesthetic. There's no physical reason.
5/16" would be unplayable. 3/8" is favoured by non-pedal players who depend on slants. 11/32" it is, or close to it.
Incidentally, it would be easy to ridicule Paul for trying to reinvent the wagon wheel, but it's always healthy to question assumptions and to remind ourselves how we got here.
Make sleeping dogs tell the truth!
Homebuilt keyless U12 7x5, Excel keyless U12 8x8, Williams keyless U12 7x8, Telonics rack and 15" cabs
Paul Leoni
Posts: 121
Joined: 8 May 2020 10:02 am
Location: Mississippi, USA

Post by Paul Leoni »

Oh hell don't worry about ridiculing me! I have cease and desist orders framed on my wall from some mighty places. It always starts out as ridicule. Fire away. Fuel. One good thing about the internet all you ever do and ever have done is documented.
Paul Leoni
Posts: 121
Joined: 8 May 2020 10:02 am
Location: Mississippi, USA

Post by Paul Leoni »

richard burton wrote:5/16" at the changer is too narrow.
11/32" at the changer is the proven ergonomic, industry standard, spacing.

I have no idea why the strings are tapered down to the nut, maybe it's an aesthetic thing.
That's the information that I need. Thank you. I do feel the market for the unit I am designing will be primarily guitarists. The more comfortable they are the better.
User avatar
Dom Franco
Posts: 1985
Joined: 16 Oct 1998 12:01 am
Location: Beaverton, OR, 97007
Contact:

Post by Dom Franco »

I believe the "taper" (smaller width at the nut than the bridge) is an unfortunate hold-over from the steel guitar's ancestors the standard guitar...

I make all of my steel guitars with parallel string spacing usually 3/8"
Paul Leoni
Posts: 121
Joined: 8 May 2020 10:02 am
Location: Mississippi, USA

Post by Paul Leoni »

Actually 5/16 is the finger width I want.
User avatar
Ian Rae
Posts: 5826
Joined: 10 Oct 2013 11:49 am
Location: Redditch, England
Contact:

Post by Ian Rae »

Some 1/32" spacers will put you right. Steel stock is metric over here so when I built my own instrument a few years back I used 6mm fingers with 3mm spacers as a comb axle brace, which comes out at 11/32" as near as makes no odds.
Make sleeping dogs tell the truth!
Homebuilt keyless U12 7x5, Excel keyless U12 8x8, Williams keyless U12 7x8, Telonics rack and 15" cabs
Post Reply