The Steel Guitar Forum Store 

Post new topic WHAT IF???
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  WHAT IF???
Henry Matthews


From:
Texarkana, Ark USA
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 6:48 am    
Reply with quote

This thread is already being beat around in several topics but I would like to submit this.
What if you took the same source of wood, the same source of aluminum, the same pickups and the same strings and built three different guitars. Let's say a Zum, an Emmons and a Mullin and had them all put together to their respective specs, will they still sound like a Zum, an Emmons and a Mullin or will they sound alike.

I realize that alot of other things besides the material make up the sound of the guitar but I think that the material it's made from has the biggest part of the sound.
What do you all think??
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Donny Hinson

 

From:
Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 7:10 am    
Reply with quote

Nope, they'd sound different due to the design characteristics of the parts.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Scott Moon


From:
Canyon Lake, TX
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 7:27 am    
Reply with quote

IMHO, No two of the same brand sound the same. I have had two Zums sitting side by side plugged into the same amp, same settings and both had a different sound. The same with Emmons Guitars. I believe this is the same with any instrument. Of course this is my opinion.

Scott
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Bobby Lee


From:
Cloverdale, California, USA
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 7:58 am    
Reply with quote

Quote:
I realize that alot of other things besides the material make up the sound of the guitar but I think that the material it's made from has the biggest part of the sound.
I think that the strings form the biggest part of the sound we hear as players, followed by the pickup, the color and the fretboard design. After that, the materials and construction of the instrument come into play.

------------------
Bobby Lee (a.k.a. b0b) - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Williams D-12 E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (F Diatonic)
Sierra Laptop S-8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (E13, C6 or A6) My Blog

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Charlie Willcockson

 

From:
Missouri, USA
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 8:00 am    
Reply with quote

I am new to pedal steel, but I have experienced exactly what Scott describes too many times with different instruments including different steels of same make for it to be accidental. This is one of the things I love about stringed instruments. Just my two cents.

------------------
"Praise the LORD with harp: sing unto him with the psaltry and an instrument of ten strings"-Psalm 33:2
View user's profile Send private message

Herb Steiner


From:
Briarcliff TX 78669, pop. 2,064
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 8:06 am    
Reply with quote

b0b, are you saying the DECAL on the front apron has no bearing on the sound whatsoever?

------------------
Herb's Steel Guitar Pages
Texas Steel Guitar Association

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Robert Leaman


From:
Murphy, North Carolina, USA
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 8:19 am    
Reply with quote

When I put vinyl crutch tips on the two rear legs of my Sierra Session, it sounds like an Emmons Bolt-on push-pull. Then, when I remove those tips and place the bare legs on a carpeted floor, it sounds like a Sho-Bud. Usually, I have original Sierra tips installed on the rear legs and so it sounds like a Sierra Session. I prefer Sierra Session sound. If front leg tips are taken off and/or replaced with various types on the front legs, there is absolutely no change in the sound. I believe this proves that all the acoustic energy is transmitted only by the rear legs into the floor. The effect does not change for various floor types, concrete, wood, ceramic tile, carpet. etc. Since my PSG is gearless, this may possibly not be the same for obsolete, geared tuners.

Band members were astounded when I demonstrated this during one session.

I didn't add any smileys since everything that I said is as true as some of the other things that I read on the forum.

[This message was edited by Robert Leaman on 02 November 2006 at 11:35 AM.]

[This message was edited by Robert Leaman on 02 November 2006 at 11:36 AM.]



See the Honorable Pat Burns post for verification this post's information.

[This message was edited by Robert Leaman on 03 November 2006 at 09:54 AM.]

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Bob Knight


From:
Bowling Green KY
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 9:00 am    
Reply with quote

Robert,
You forgot to add the "smileys" to your post??
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Pat Burns

 

From:
Branchville, N.J. USA
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 9:20 am    
Reply with quote

Quote:
I think that the strings form the biggest part of the sound we hear as players, followed by the pickup, the color and the fretboard design. After that, the materials and construction of the instrument come into play.


...These items are critical to the sound, but not as critical as the contact points the guitar makes with the ground...the rubber feet make all the difference, damping the vibrations considerably. Try replacing the rubber leg-caps with copper or aluminum plumbing pipe-caps....entirely different sound as the vibrations can resonate freely into the floor. Same concept as electricity, which makes sense, since it's an electric guitar.

The end-caps make less of a difference if you use wooden legs (aka peg legs), since the wooden legs give the guitar a mellower timbre, same as wooden necks do. With wooden legs, it's better just to use wooden end-caps. They're available at any Home Depot, next to the leg extensions.

EDIT - My apologies to Bob Leamon..I didn't read your post, Bob, before writing this..didn't mean to piggy-back on your idea. On the other hand, great minds and all that...

[This message was edited by Pat Burns on 02 November 2006 at 11:39 AM.]

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Donny Hinson

 

From:
Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 9:28 am    
Reply with quote

Quote:
...are you saying the DECAL on the front apron has no bearing on the sound whatsoever?


Ah yes, decals. (The ultimate expression of manufacturing cheapness. )
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Jerry Roller


From:
Van Buren, Arkansas USA
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 9:36 am    
Reply with quote

The players footwear certainly has a huge bearing on tone. The heavier the boot the more loadbearing on the pedal thus the more solid the contact of all components from the pedal all the way to the changer, thus heavier body contact. A "tighter tone cycle".
(signed) Buck
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

chris ivey


From:
california (deceased)
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 9:57 am    
Reply with quote

suppose you're recording with the nashville A team...if all the pickers are the same at the same studio playing the same song, would your steel sound different with carrie underwood singing than it would with kelly pickler?
View user's profile Send private message

Bobby Lee


From:
Cloverdale, California, USA
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 10:09 am    
Reply with quote

Herb asked:
Quote:
b0b, are you saying the DECAL on the front apron has no bearing on the sound whatsoever?
That is correct inasfar as the player is concerned, Herb. The player can't see the decal. It may, however, affect the sound from the audience point of view, especially if the audience is comprised of steel guitarists.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Dave Seddon

 

From:
Leicester, England.
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 10:30 am    
Reply with quote

I would imagine the only steels that would sound exactly the same would be the MSA Milleniums as they are made of the carbon stuff, providing the pickups are exactly the same. Could be wrong!!! Dave.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Pat Burns

 

From:
Branchville, N.J. USA
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 11:35 am    
Reply with quote

...if that was true, Dave, the Millenium would sound exactly like a Stealth Fighter...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Roger Edgington


From:
San Antonio, Texas USA
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 11:54 am    
Reply with quote

Now I'm concerned as my MSA classic lost it's decal and no longer knows what it supposed to sound like. At least it's black.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Greg Cutshaw


From:
Corry, PA, USA
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 12:24 pm    
Reply with quote

If you tip the guitar forward a little, the notes will roll right off it at pretty high speed. This is much easier to accomplish than going after pick blocking. Check and fast player's guitar and you will see that they are using this technique.

Greg
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger

Mike Wheeler


From:
Delaware, Ohio, USA
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 12:53 pm    
Reply with quote

Good one, Roger!! LOL!!!!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Henry Matthews


From:
Texarkana, Ark USA
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 1:15 pm    
Reply with quote

You guys are funny. But aside from the humor, most of you all agree that each guitar would have the same brand name sound no matter what wood the cabinet is made of.

I agree to this also, so it must be the way the under parts, changer and end plates are put on that gives each guitar its Emmons, Sho-Bud or whatever brand you try distinctive sound.

So, may next question is why. Lets face it, most modern all pull guitars are made practically the same. Maybe it is in the Logo on front of the guitar.

If you were in a semi dark room (light enough to see to play, barely) and I had put a Mullin guitar, black of course, with an Emmons logo on the front and of course, put a fake little tone and neck switch in the middle. Would you think that the guitar sounded like an Emmons or not. If I put a Sam's Cola in a coke bottle, I'll bet 99.9% couldn't tell the difference. Now, how about the steel guitars?

Please don't think that I'm saying all guitars sound alike. I'm not, but I am saying that the Logo on front does play a part in the sound.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Mike Perlowin


From:
Los Angeles CA
Post  Posted 2 Nov 2006 3:49 pm    
Reply with quote

Quote:
.if that was true, Dave, the Millenium would sound exactly like a Stealth Fighter...


I guess you haven't heard me attempt to play mine yet.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Reece Anderson

 

From:
Keller Texas USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 3 Nov 2006 6:43 am    
Reply with quote

I appreciate those of you who have mentioned MSA in this thread.

When we designed the new MSA in 2001, one of our highest priorities was consistency relative to sound, expansion and contraction.

After considerable research we determined that to attain our goal of consistency we had to choose carbon composite. The fact a carbon composite body neither recognizes temperature nor moisture variations, translates to the body not expanding or contracting.

Each piece of carbon composite is "exactly" like another, whereas each piece of wood has different density, grain and moisture content, all of which can create a reaction which manifests itself by expanding or contracting when subjected to changing temperatures and varying moisture levels. Wood continually expands and contracts, which can be verified by the screws on the underside becoming loose over a relatively short period of time.

In addition, as wood ages and the moisture is gradually depleted, it creates the propensity for tonal change, sometimes for the better, and sometimes the opposite. In either case, neither provides consistency. Carbon composite eliminates this completely, therefore provides consistency never before attainable.

Many prefer the traditional look of a wood guitar with beautiful grain which has a unique and one of a kind look which is not available in carbon composite. In addition, there are those who say wood has a sound characteristic not attainable with carbon composite. It is my belief that due to the varying characteristics of wood, each body has a slightly different tonal characteristic which in itself may be appealing to some.

Over the many years MSA has been in business, we have made it a priority to do our best to offer something for most every steel player’s personal taste, which is why today we offer both carbon composite and wood guitars.

In addition, MSA has went to great lengths to achieve a "retro-fit" concept on all MSA guitars made since 2001. Were we to contemplate the introduction of new models, our doing so would not represent a change of direction or philosophy, nor would we be introducing obsolescence to anyone owning an MSA or having one on order. MSA will always make a concerted effort in the design stage to maintain the possibility for existing guitars to be retrofitted to include newer features where there is a reasonable likelihood that current owners might wish to have any such features installed.

View user's profile Send private message

ed packard

 

From:
Show Low AZ
Post  Posted 3 Nov 2006 7:54 am    
Reply with quote

WHAT IF...the manufacturers of the various PSGs would publish data on the stability of their instrument re temperature et al. The issue is cents of tuning shift per string per degree of temperature change. This is not just a matter of body material, but of strings, bridge/nut/changer construction/attachment, and how the cross shafts are tied to each other, how the stops are made and located, and a bunch of other stuff is accomplished in the fabrication of the PSG.

There is not much one can do about the thermal expansion of the strings, therefor it would seem that the rest of the instrument should be made to track the strings thermal expansion characteristics.

The total (just about)absence of numerical data re the various instruments is an indication of where the industry is on the subject of design.

Some instruments have the nut screwed into the neck block which is then screwed into the body...others have it as an integral part of the keyhead, which is then screwed to the body....which way is best?...no measurements, no data, just verbosity.

Some instruments have been said to have a varying tone according to how tight the screws that attach the neck to the body are...does anyone torque the screws to a given value to assure some degree of consistency?

I realize that most of this does not mean a dang thing to the average picker, but it is what makes their instrument what it is and does. Lots more...including lamination's of all sorts in a variety of materials.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Reece Anderson

 

From:
Keller Texas USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 3 Nov 2006 9:16 am    
Reply with quote

Ed P....I can only speak for MSA, but be assured we have done the research and accumulated numerical data which we consider unique and proprietary to our instrument.

In further response.....MSA has very specific torque settings which is critical and promotes consistency.
View user's profile Send private message

ed packard

 

From:
Show Low AZ
Post  Posted 3 Nov 2006 9:59 am    
Reply with quote

Reece A...Ok, i'm assured re MSA having "unique and proprietary" info/data.

Happy to hear that torque values are used.

How about some cents per degree values?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Reece Anderson

 

From:
Keller Texas USA, R.I.P.
Post  Posted 3 Nov 2006 10:21 am    
Reply with quote

Ed P....You have email.
View user's profile Send private message


All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  

Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction,
steel guitars & accessories

www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

Please review our Forum Rules and Policies

Steel Guitar Forum LLC
PO Box 237
Mount Horeb, WI 53572 USA


Click Here to Send a Donation

Email admin@steelguitarforum.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for
Band-in-a-Box

by Jim Baron
HTTP