Question for SB players using Rack & Barrel pulls

Instruments, mechanical issues, copedents, techniques, etc.

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

Post Reply
User avatar
Mark McCornack
Posts: 332
Joined: 25 Jul 2016 11:14 am
Location: California, USA

Question for SB players using Rack & Barrel pulls

Post by Mark McCornack »

Greetings.... on Sho-Bud guitars fitted with Rack & Barrel rod pull configurations, the orientation of the rack can be one of two ways, and I’ve seen pictures here on the forum illustrating both methods. Some where the barrel engages with the rack on the “closed” side; the “face” of the rack where the holes are drilled. Others orient the rack so the “open” edge interfaces the barrels. Contact with the barrel in this case (when engaged), is against the two rails comprising the side walls of the rack.

Both orientations seem to function, and I don’t know if there is a specific convention, or an advantage of one over the other. Anybody have any input to share on this? :roll:
User avatar
Dan Beller-McKenna
Posts: 2979
Joined: 3 Apr 2005 1:01 am
Location: Durham, New Hampshire, USA
Contact:

Post by Dan Beller-McKenna »

If I recall an old extensive thread correctly:
  • The racks were originally designed for the open side to face the barrel.

    Sometime early in their history someone at Shobud accidentally reversed them.

    People became accustomed to having the closed side facing the barrel.

    Patent drawings were inconclusive.

    People discussed on the Forum.

    Feathers flew.

    Either way works roughly as well as the other.
On my last R+B Bud I ended up with open side facing the barrel, but I'm not sure I noticed a real difference.
User avatar
Mark McCornack
Posts: 332
Joined: 25 Jul 2016 11:14 am
Location: California, USA

Post by Mark McCornack »

Thanks. I didn’t mean to re-open an old can of worms, but this helps. I’ll see if I can find the old thread on this. Might be interesting. It sounds like it is a controversial subject with some.

Good thing I didn’t ask “Hey, how and with what do you lubricate your guitar?” :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Dan Beller-McKenna
Posts: 2979
Joined: 3 Apr 2005 1:01 am
Location: Durham, New Hampshire, USA
Contact:

Post by Dan Beller-McKenna »

User avatar
Mark McCornack
Posts: 332
Joined: 25 Jul 2016 11:14 am
Location: California, USA

Post by Mark McCornack »

VERY informative thread! Thanks a million Dan! :D
User avatar
Benton Allen
Posts: 490
Joined: 19 Jun 2004 12:01 am
Location: Muscle Shoals, Alabama, USA

Post by Benton Allen »

Dan is correct.
I asked David Jackson this very question in St. Louis a few years back. David said his design originally intended for the Rack edges to face the barrel in order to give the spring "Tit" an edge to catch on.
At some point someone at the factory rodded a guitar backwards by mistake. David said that it seemed to work just fine either way, but that the "correct way" was for the Rack edges to face the barrel.
Cheers!
Brad Malone
Posts: 1440
Joined: 2 Nov 2006 1:01 am
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Poor quality control

Post by Brad Malone »

Where was the quality control department?..they should have caught a big error like that. No wonder why they went down the drain.
Ron Pruter
Posts: 1555
Joined: 25 Feb 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Arizona, USA

Post by Ron Pruter »

Problem with them is they are not idiot proof. Those "tits" can bend when you've run out of thread and then any hope of tuning the pull is gone. If you're not pretty mechanically savvy, I would avoid rack and barrel guitars. RP
Emmons SKH Le Grande, '73 P/J bass, Tick tack bass, Regal high strung, and a Coral Sitar, USA Nashville 112.
Post Reply