Page 1 of 1
BOSS KATANA vs FOCUSRITE SCARLETT
Posted: 20 Feb 2018 6:00 pm
by Stephen Abruzzo
Thinking about getting a new amp and/or recording device within the next year as I would like to start recording myself playing.
I really like the Boss Katana amps with USB connectivity. However, I read some folks discuss recording through their Focusrite Scarlett.
It's all Greek to me and so I come here asking for explanations in layman's terms. I have some amps already. If I use the Focusrite to record off my current amps, does that mean the amp has to have a direct out or line out?
Which is better for recording while I play.....going thru the Katana or the Focusrite. Is one way better than the other?
Feeling dazed and confused. Thanks in advance for any help you all can give.
Posted: 20 Feb 2018 7:33 pm
by mtulbert
To answer your question.
The Boss Katana does have a line out so if you want to record into the Focusrite you would be all set to go. I do this with my Boss Katana amp with good results.
The USB on the Boss Katana is for modifying patches and settings for the amp. It is not for recording.
If your amp does not have a direct out or line out you would need to mic your amp and run the mic into the Focusrite to get a signal to your computer.
There are lots of folks here on the forum that do record that way with great results and actually prefer using a mic on the amp rather than going direct. It all depends on what your preferences are.
Regards,
Posted: 21 Feb 2018 3:34 am
by Jack Stoner
I have a home recording studio.
The Katana is an amplifier, but its not a recording interface unit for your PC. You will need a recording interface unit, such as a Focusrite (or many other brands).
Two different "animals".
If you are going to get a recording interface unit, suggest you get one that has its own power supply. There are some entry level models that use power from the PC's USB port to power the recording interface unit. Many of these are iffy at best especially if you need phantom power (48VDC) for a condenser microphone. You also need to consider how many analog/preamp inputs you want on your recording interface unit. Also, some come with a (lite version) recording program and some do not. If you don't have a recording program or do not want a specific program then consider one that does give you an introductory version recording program (but be aware these are usually limited in the number of tracks).
Posted: 21 Feb 2018 3:43 am
by Steve Sycamore
The Scarlett has an exceptional good quality ADC (analog to digital converter) and sounds really superb recording directly from the instrument with no DI box. I'm assuming you might want to re-amp the raw recorded signal afterwards. The provided phantom power and microphone direct in actually works at least as well as most specialized preamps. The caveats are as Jack mentioned, if you connect the Scarlett's outputs to another audio device you may hear lots of digital noise leaking into that second device. Also, generally any USB device like the Scarlett has lots of delay in any signal passing all the way through it. Luckily the Scarlett can be switched to monitor the input signal for no delay, but then you won't hear any sound coming from the PC.
Posted: 21 Feb 2018 11:33 am
by Stephen Abruzzo
I have Yamaha THR10C that I believe I can right into the computer via USB and then record into Audacity.
I also have some other amps, so with Direct Out and/or line out and then one I would have to mic. Those were the ones I was wondering about using Focusrite to record with.
Thanks for the suggestions.
Posted: 22 Feb 2018 10:11 am
by Les Cargill
You may not be able to use more than one USB thing with "ASIO drivers" at a time. You will likely want to use ASIO drivers for low-latency monitoring.
That puts things in favor of a multi-input Scarlett-style interface if that's at issue.
Also - what Jack said - avoid USB bus-powered interfaces.
If cost is an issue, Behringer makes a complete complement of lower-priced interfaces - but make sure they offer ASIO drivers for them and make sure you can take/send it back if the ASIO drivers don't work on your setup. I have seen conflicting reports of issues with Behringer equipment this way. I have seen no issues ( on online fora ) with ASIO on Focusrite interfaces.
Posted: 22 Feb 2018 10:28 am
by Stephen Abruzzo
Just eyeballing the Focusrite Scarlett series on
www.sweetwater.com, it seems as though all of the Scarlett series are USB powered??
Any recommendations for things not USB-powered?
Posted: 22 Feb 2018 10:57 am
by Jack Stoner
My backup unit is a Scarlett 6i6 and it has a power supply.
What is your budget? That would help to find a suitable unit.
Posted: 22 Feb 2018 12:06 pm
by Stephen Abruzzo
I was thinking of a budget about $150-200. I just want to be able to record my playing (as horrible as it may be) and then review it after the fact. Maybe the occasional post to a Forum I may be in.
I did have a look at the Focusrite Scarlett Solo manual and it did say that powering should not be a problem through the USB port. However, it did say if you were running the Scarlett through a laptop, then you should make sure the laptop is plugged into an electrical outlet.
I will be using this with a computer tower that is always plugged in.
Posted: 22 Feb 2018 5:26 pm
by Paddy Long
I use a Focusrite Scarlett 2i4 and it does a sterling job -- I go directly from my Telonics PRE1000 - stereo feed into the two inputs on the Scarlett (wet and dry) --- connectivity to the PC is via USB and yes, it does provide the power to the unit as well.
It doesn't matter what recording software you use either, it's pretty much compatible with everything - well worth investigating.
Posted: 22 Feb 2018 7:05 pm
by Stephen Abruzzo
Paddy Long wrote:I use a Focusrite Scarlett 2i4 and it does a sterling job -- I go directly from my Telonics PRE1000 - stereo feed into the two inputs on the Scarlett (wet and dry) --- connectivity to the PC is via USB and yes, it does provide the power to the unit as well.
It doesn't matter what recording software you use either, it's pretty much compatible with everything - well worth investigating.
Thanks for your reply. What do the Midi In and Midi Out "holes" in the back do? Do you use them?
What do you mean by "wet and dry" inputs?
Sorry for the questions but I'm BRAND NEW to recording and it's a lot to take in.
Posted: 23 Feb 2018 12:14 am
by Steve Sycamore
Any recommendations for things not USB-powered?
There is Firewire which suffers to some extent what USB suffers. The best I/O now seems to be Thunderbolt.
https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques ... best-audio
But your PC/Mac has to have the right Intel chipset and the audio boxes are pricey. Latency is very good, back into the short times of serial I/O. You could, by the way, probably find an extremely satisfying box used such as an Echo Gina or Layla.
Posted: 23 Feb 2018 9:50 am
by Stefan Robertson
Alot of multi-effects pedals have built in audio interfaces - for direct recording and amp simulation.
I love Boss. I use the Boss ME25.
Amp I use Vox 40VTX as they also offer a valve preamp and connect via USB and I have been saving custom presets on both to mimic
Emmons, Jernigan and Tom Morrell sounds - so smooth to crisp.
If you have either setup I am happy to send you some presets that you just load and it tunes/setups your amp for each option.
Posted: 1 Mar 2018 2:28 pm
by Paddy Long
Stephen I don't use the Midi in and outs at all.
Wet means that line has effects on it ...Dry is guitar signal only without any effects! I have my rack wired to give me that type of output !
Posted: 2 Mar 2018 8:06 pm
by David Mason
I've been trying to out-sneak some sort of awful high-end whine that shows up using Audacity as the primary recording program. I can sample it to delete but that eats up some tone too. All the advice I get so far is basically "stop being so cheap", AKA "Audacity: you get what you pay for."
Posted: 5 Mar 2018 11:41 pm
by Stephen Williams
I use a Focusrite scarlett 8i8 and it works very well.
I use Reaper as a recording software or DAW (Digital audio workstation). Check it out at reaperfm. Not only is it very good, it is very stable and has a small imprint, it's cheap at $60 and best of all there is a fantastic friendly forum where you get help very quickly from the users. It's like the forum here. great bunch of helpful, friendly people.
Reaper can give Protools a run for it's money. it is not a toy.
Posted: 6 Mar 2018 6:40 am
by mtulbert
Just started using Reaper here instead of Pro Tools. It works great.
Yesterday I had a friend come over and he wanted to start recording his steel to evaluate his progress. He bought the Focusrite 212 ( I think that is the correct number) and we installed Reaper. He has a Mac Laptop and we had him up and running in 15 minutes.
Took the line output of the Katana into the Focusrite and it sounded great. Clean and sweet.
Good Combo IMHO