Page 1 of 1

independent tone control

Posted: 13 Jan 2017 8:38 pm
by Thomas Webb
Hello

Just wondering if anyone has ever come across an independent tone control unit, perhaps something that could be mounted on the leg of a steel to achieve a lap steel type, boo-wah effect. Check out the video, and see what Buddy Merrill does at 0:50.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RF05gVe47S4

I am assuming that control is likely part of the guitar, but id be interested in one that mounts on the leg and could be used on different guitars.

Thanks very much

Tom

tone control

Posted: 14 Jan 2017 3:07 am
by Paul Brainard
Goodrich made one - I have one although haven't seen too many around. Just a plain, passive tone control - wouldn't be too hard to make one, all you need is a pot and a capacitor, and a project box and a leg clip (George L I think sells those. . )

Posted: 14 Jan 2017 4:27 am
by Scott Duckworth
Here's a circuit for a "treble and bass" control. Build it in a small box. You might have to play with the values of the capacitors to get what you want.


Image

Posted: 14 Jan 2017 5:56 am
by Jeff Mead
I suspect it might not be in the ideal position to use it like Buddy did if it was mounted on the leg.

Have you considered one of the volume/tone pedals which had the tone control from side to side. Bigsby, Fender and DeArmond all used to make them. Nobody makes one now but used ones do come up fairly regularly. Fender re-issued theirs a few year back but have now discontinued that too but they are probably the easiest to find.

Personally, I find it much easier to operate the Boo-Wah with my foot.

If you don't use volume swells (as many lap players don't) you could convert a volume only pedal to tone only pretty easily.

Posted: 14 Jan 2017 9:42 am
by Paul Brainard
It's true the leg-mounted position isn't all that convenient for boo-wah-ing. A tone-only pedal is a great idea, or you could also have a tone control installed on your guitar. Or maybe some kind of surface-mounted box??

Posted: 14 Jan 2017 9:46 am
by Erv Niehaus
Goodrich's Match Box has a tone control on it and it attaches to the leg. Why couldn't that be used?

Posted: 14 Jan 2017 10:00 am
by Jeff Mead
Erv Niehaus wrote:Goodrich's Match Box has a tone control on it and it attaches to the leg. Why couldn't that be used?
Not a dramatic enough tone change for the effect and even if it was, not positioned well enough.

As in interesting aside, because of impedance or something, if you do use a Matchbox then the tone part of a volume/tone pedal has zero effect.

Posted: 14 Jan 2017 11:05 am
by Bruce Derr
Jeff Mead wrote: As in interesting aside, because of impedance or something, if you do use a Matchbox then the tone part of a volume/tone pedal has zero effect.
It is indeed because of impedance. The low impedance output of a buffer makes the signal essentially immune to the treble-reducing effect of cable capacitance... and of tone control capacitors as well.

Posted: 14 Jan 2017 11:57 am
by Mike Perlowin
Wouldn't it ne simpler just to hook up a wah wah pedal next to the volume pedal?

Some guys already do this.

Posted: 14 Jan 2017 11:57 am
by Mike Perlowin
Wouldn't it ne simpler just to hook up a wah wah pedal next to the volume pedal?

Some guys already do this.

Posted: 14 Jan 2017 12:15 pm
by Jeff Mead
Mike Perlowin wrote:Wouldn't it ne simpler just to hook up a wah wah pedal next to the volume pedal?

Some guys already do this.
It's a completely different sound - active boost rather than passive. OK if that's what you want but it wont sound like the clip the OP posted.

Posted: 14 Jan 2017 2:52 pm
by Jack Hanson
Jeff Mead wrote:
Mike Perlowin wrote:Wouldn't it ne simpler just to hook up a wah wah pedal next to the volume pedal?

Some guys already do this.
It's a completely different sound - active boost rather than passive. OK if that's what you want but it wont sound like the clip the OP posted.
To carry this discussion one step further, how difficult would it be to convert a donor Vox, Cry Baby, Dunlop, etc. pedal from its active wah circuit to a passive tone control circuit? In addition, could you retain the pedal's original on/off switch to cut the effect in and out as needed? Being a passive circuit, would the pedal be considered "true bypass" when the pot and cap are switched off?

Posted: 15 Jan 2017 5:45 am
by Lane Gray
Jack, the answer to the difficulty question is "deaf easy."
The true bypass question would depend on how you wired it.

Posted: 15 Jan 2017 6:37 am
by Jeff Mead
I think true bypass might be overcomplicating it - we're only trying to duplicate the sound of a Stringmaster tone control after all.

Posted: 15 Jan 2017 9:21 am
by Lane Gray
But since the tone knob bleeds highs to ground, true bypass is probably a very easy thing to do.
Switch off; essentially a straight wire from J1 to J2, engaged, pot and cap shunt to ground

Posted: 16 Jan 2017 5:43 am
by Thomas Webb
Thanks for all the feedback guys, some great ideas here! very much appreciated.

Tom

Posted: 16 Jan 2017 1:36 pm
by Brad Sarno

Posted: 16 Jan 2017 2:31 pm
by Jeff Mead
Brad Sarno wrote:Tone control and buffer
http://www.sarnomusicsolutions.com/products/fl.html
I'd certainly be interested to see a demo of this being used in the style of the original clip.

Posted: 16 Jan 2017 4:10 pm
by Jack Stanton
Or you could just by yourself an Emmons guitar.

Posted: 16 Jan 2017 10:49 pm
by Paul Brainard
What about something based on the idea of a Theramin, but instead of controlling the pitch or volume it controls the tone (or assign it to a freqency sweep, really whatever you want. . .) So you could do the boo-wah thing without a knob, just by waving your hand around. Sure would look cool, anyway.

Posted: 17 Jan 2017 7:02 pm
by Thomas Webb
This looks great Brad, do you have any clips of it in action and could it be used to achieve the boo-wah effect?

Thanks Tom