I just bought a Fender 1000, and it's a little different than the one I owned in 1957. I'm curious when this one was built. It has bridge and nut rollers which my old one didn't have. Ser # 01815
Jim
Fender 1000 [When built?]
Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn
-
- Posts: 794
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: wilburton, Ok. US * R.I.P.
-
- Posts: 21192
- Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
I think it was in early '63 that Fender went with the roller nut, and and did away with the solid-bar bridge (though there may have been a few made in late '62). Some guitars may have been improved with these features by custom builders, too.
A little later, in the '63-'64 timeframe, the scale length also changed from 24 1/2" to 23". The earlier (longer scale) guitars had a wide pickup, and the later (short-scale) guitars had a narrow (Jaguar type) pickup which was mounted on an angle. Other distinguishing features of the guitars were the bridge covers, which were rectangular hinged-type on the early models, and D-shaped on the later models. This later model also sported a built in mute (which was seldom used by anyone).
If your guitar has all the "late model" features outlined above, it had to have been made after 1962. (Probably shortly after, in the late '63-early '64 timeframe.)
A little later, in the '63-'64 timeframe, the scale length also changed from 24 1/2" to 23". The earlier (longer scale) guitars had a wide pickup, and the later (short-scale) guitars had a narrow (Jaguar type) pickup which was mounted on an angle. Other distinguishing features of the guitars were the bridge covers, which were rectangular hinged-type on the early models, and D-shaped on the later models. This later model also sported a built in mute (which was seldom used by anyone).
If your guitar has all the "late model" features outlined above, it had to have been made after 1962. (Probably shortly after, in the late '63-early '64 timeframe.)
-
- Posts: 794
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: wilburton, Ok. US * R.I.P.
Thanks Donny, You described it to a "T". I've seen those with the narrow pickup and the built in mute. This one is just as you described with the wide pickups and the hinged rectangular bridge covers. I lucked out, this one is in what I'd call excellent condition, although the finish shows it's age. It's the "Sunburst" finish that shows the wood grain. A lot of nostalgia there. Thanks again for the info.
Jim
Jim
-
- Posts: 21192
- Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
- Jody Carver
- Posts: 7968
- Joined: 3 Jan 2001 1:01 am
- Location: KNIGHT OF FENDER TWEED
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 6006
- Joined: 18 May 2000 12:01 am
- Location: Claremont , CA USA
Jody is correct.
I sent off for the kit and installed it on my Fender 400 PSG.
There was also another mod. The original 400/1000 models did not have the little "hooks" between the ball of the string and the changer fingers.
So I sent off and installed these also. But NOTHING but nothing would stop this steel from breaking the .011 high G#. It was impossible even to get the string up to pitch let alone press pedals.
Since I was NOT willing to go to an Eb or D based tuning, I finally in desparation sold it and bought an Emmons P/P in the fall of '69.
While a number of things were solved in doing this, I hated (still do) the basic built-in slop that is necessary on a P/P when strings are raised AND lowered.
It is worth repeating, all pull all the way for me. If your Fender has the moving bridge (later design) it is a good 'un.
God bless you,
carl
I sent off for the kit and installed it on my Fender 400 PSG.
There was also another mod. The original 400/1000 models did not have the little "hooks" between the ball of the string and the changer fingers.
So I sent off and installed these also. But NOTHING but nothing would stop this steel from breaking the .011 high G#. It was impossible even to get the string up to pitch let alone press pedals.
Since I was NOT willing to go to an Eb or D based tuning, I finally in desparation sold it and bought an Emmons P/P in the fall of '69.
While a number of things were solved in doing this, I hated (still do) the basic built-in slop that is necessary on a P/P when strings are raised AND lowered.
It is worth repeating, all pull all the way for me. If your Fender has the moving bridge (later design) it is a good 'un.
God bless you,
carl