String Spacing

Instruments, mechanical issues, copedents, techniques, etc.

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

Post Reply
Ken Frazier
Posts: 75
Joined: 2 Jan 2002 1:01 am
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA

String Spacing

Post by Ken Frazier »

Is there any Difference in the string spacing between Carter Steels, Zum Steels,Emmons and the others or do all of them use a standard
Just wondering
Thanks
Ken Frazier
User avatar
Jim Smith
Posts: 7946
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Midlothian, TX, USA

Post by Jim Smith »

The "standard" spacing at the bridge is 11/32" or 0.34375". Some of the older guitars had narrower and a few had wider spacing. Most, if not all, of today's guitars have standardized, although a lot of 12 strings have narrower spacing to squeeze into a narrower guitar or neck.
Ken Frazier
Posts: 75
Joined: 2 Jan 2002 1:01 am
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA

Post by Ken Frazier »

Thanks I appreciate the reply
George Kimery
Posts: 3691
Joined: 23 Feb 2002 1:01 am
Location: Limestone, TN, USA

Post by George Kimery »

My Kline U-12 has a 9/32" spacing, for example.
Jim Phelps
Posts: 3421
Joined: 6 Sep 2002 12:01 am
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Contact:

Post by Jim Phelps »

The string spacing on my '74 MSA D-12 is definitely closer than my '70-something Sho-Bud 6139.
User avatar
Bobby Lee
Site Admin
Posts: 14863
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Cloverdale, California, USA
Contact:

Post by Bobby Lee »

Right. My Williams is closer than my Sierra, and sometimes it throws me off when I switch guitars.

------------------
<small><img align=right src="http://b0b.com/b0b.gif" width="64" height="64">Bobby Lee - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs
Sierra Session 12 (E9), Williams 400X (Emaj9, D6), Sierra Olympic 12 (F Diatonic) Sierra Laptop 8 (D13), Fender Stringmaster (E13, A6)
User avatar
Al Marcus
Posts: 9440
Joined: 12 May 1999 12:01 am
Location: Cedar Springs,MI USA (deceased)
Contact:

Post by Al Marcus »

I seem to notice that the S12's that I had were a narrower spacing than the D10's. 11/32 is ok with me, but 10/32 or 9/32 would be too narrow.
I wouldnt be able to get my fingers in there and would hit a lot of wrong strings. (lack of practice, right?) ....al Image
User avatar
chas smith
Posts: 5043
Joined: 28 Feb 2001 1:01 am
Location: Encino, CA, USA

Post by chas smith »

Joaquin Murphey played .375 (3/8) at the nut and the bridge. Same from one end to the other.
Glenn Suchan
Posts: 2351
Joined: 24 Sep 1998 12:01 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Post by Glenn Suchan »

On my 14-string Sierra the string spacing goes from approximately .250" at the nut to about .375" at the changer. Before playing the Sierra I played an Emmons S10 p/p and it took me about two weeks to get comfortable with the narrow spacing of the Sierra.

Keep on pickin'!
Glenn
User avatar
Jay Jessup
Posts: 952
Joined: 12 Jan 1999 1:01 am
Location: Charlottesville, VA, USA

Post by Jay Jessup »

I thought most all modern guitars had about the same string spacing at the bridge but the MSA's and their descendants ie: Carter, GFI, MCI and others are narrower at the nut than the Emmons descendants (Zum, Franklin and many others) and this does give a distinctly different feel to them even back in the picking area. For a period of time when I was working on pick blocking I thought that the narrower string spacing was a disadvantage but that may not be true for someone who has a lot of experience with it.
User avatar
Doug Seymour
Posts: 1039
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Jamestown NY USA (deceased)

Post by Doug Seymour »

I always thought ShoBuds had a bit wider spacing than the Emmons, MSA, Zum & others.
Used to have the measurements, but not anymore.
User avatar
Ricky Davis
Posts: 10964
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Bertram, Texas USA
Contact:

Post by Ricky Davis »

Yes the ShoBuds are 3/8" at the Bridge and 5/16" at the nut. But the Permenant ShoBuds had a narrower string spacing....probably same as new modern pedal steels.
Ricky<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Ricky Davis on 31 July 2002 at 11:26 AM.]</p></FONT>
User avatar
Jim Smith
Posts: 7946
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Midlothian, TX, USA

Post by Jim Smith »

Ricky, are you sure Sho-Buds are that wide at the changer? Image If they're really that wide, standard pickups which are spaced at 11/32" wouldn't line up with the strings very well. Back in the 70's I put stock Sho-Bud pickups in an old MSA and the magnets lined up perfectly.

Could someone please measure the spacing on their Sho-Bud and confirm?
Jim Phelps
Posts: 3421
Joined: 6 Sep 2002 12:01 am
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Contact:

Post by Jim Phelps »

I can't tell you what the measurements are, but I can tell you for sure that the MSA D-10 I bought new in '79 was narrower than the Sho-Bud Pro II and Pro III's I bought in the early '80's. As b0b said, it was (and still is) enough to throw me off until I get used to it. In fact, I'm going to sell my MSA D-12 because even after playing it for a year I'm just better at the wider string-spacing of my Sho-Bud S-10, even though I like having the two extra strings. <FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Jim Phelps on 31 July 2002 at 12:25 PM.]</p></FONT>
User avatar
Ricky Davis
Posts: 10964
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Bertram, Texas USA
Contact:

Post by Ricky Davis »

Ok I just Measured me ShoBud Pro II....and ok I'll go with 11/32" at the bridge.
It's very very close to 3/8".....ah....ha.
Ricky
Steven Welborn
Posts: 1315
Joined: 13 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Ojai,CA USA

Post by Steven Welborn »

My friends' MSA clasic is narrower than my Emmons, and all others i've owned - Sho bud, Mullen, ZB s10.
User avatar
Jim Smith
Posts: 7946
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Midlothian, TX, USA

Post by Jim Smith »

Thanks Ricky! Image Image
Andy Greatrix
Posts: 1561
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Edmonton Alberta

Post by Andy Greatrix »

I can understand a spanish guitar getting narrower at the nut than the bridge, because of the grip and maybe because of the tension on the headstock, but why can't a steel be the same at the nut as the bridge, other than cosmetic reasons?

It would make slants easier, for one thing. As BE said, slants have a different sound than the same lick with a peddle.
Post Reply