Page 1 of 2

Chord interpretation help needed ...

Posted: 11 Feb 2014 7:13 pm
by Pete Nicholls
Image

Just got this book and need help interpreting a couple of things. The middle pic is a C augmented and the right pic is a C. The 10e lever has me baffled. Can someone tell me where the e pedal is taking that note? I also wonder what the "8va" represents. Some of the chords have that and some don't! I wish the author had shown what the levers d, e and f do so that I could make any adjustments for my copedent if necessary. Thanks for any help, and once I get this figured out, the book will become very useful.

Posted: 11 Feb 2014 7:17 pm
by Mike Perlowin
8va means play it an octave higher than written.

Posted: 11 Feb 2014 7:21 pm
by Jerome Hawkes
"e" normally stands for "lowering the E's on a knee lever" - i.e., to Eb"
"f" normally stands for "raising the E's on a knee lever" - i.e., to F
thats not always the case, but i think most tab is that way. it looks like the author has used "e" for what most tab calls the "d" lever - which lowers the 2nd sting.

the "8va" in the standard notation means that those notes are written an octave higher than noted. thats standard in music notation - if not for that, you would have to write the notes on ledger lines all over the staff and it gets cluttered.

Posted: 11 Feb 2014 7:41 pm
by Dennis Russell
The middle chord is not a C augmented. It is a C diminished. Second string is the root C (lever lowers string 1/2 step); third string is dimished 5, Gb, (b pedal 1/2 step raise); fourth string is minor third, Eb, (f lever is 1/2 step raise); sixth string is Gb, (b pedal, 1/2 step raise).

The chord on the right is a C major. The 2nd string is being lowered a 1/2 step and is the root of the chord.

A C augmented chord would be spelled c, e, g#.

If you have a question about what a lever does while looking through a book like this where the copedent may not be given, figure out what note is being played. That will tell what the lever associated with that string in the tab is altering when the lever or pedal is engaged. Not everyone uses the same left leg/right leg raises/lowers on levers. That's probably why they didn't give a copedent.

Posted: 11 Feb 2014 8:24 pm
by Brint Hannay
Apparently the book is using the terminology for levers that Jeff Newman used--he assigned the letter "D" to the lever that lowers the 4th & 8th strings 1/2 step. I guess his reasoning was that, after the three pedals--by common agreement labeled A, B, and C--the next change you would likely have, if you only had one more, would be the 4 & 8 lowers, so it should be next alphabetically, hence "D". Then, assuming the next additional change to have would be the 2nd string 1/2 step lower, it gets the designation "E"; and the next change, 4 & 8 raises, gets the designation "F", not because that's the note it raises to (that's just coincidence), but because it's "next" alphabetically in the "copedent-building" sequence after the above.

Posted: 11 Feb 2014 11:55 pm
by Ian Rae
Even more confusingly, my old D10 when I got it had just one knee lever which appeared to be an update! It lowered 2 and 8, which I think was quite common in the early days.

Posted: 12 Feb 2014 6:32 am
by Pete Nicholls
Brint Hannay wrote:Apparently the book is using the terminology for levers that Jeff Newman used--he assigned the letter "D" to the lever that lowers the 4th & 8th strings 1/2 step. I guess his reasoning was that, after the three pedals--by common agreement labeled A, B, and C--the next change you would likely have, if you only had one more, would be the 4 & 8 lowers, so it should be next alphabetically, hence "D". Then, assuming the next additional change to have would be the 2nd string 1/2 step lower, it gets the designation "E"; and the next change, 4 & 8 raises, gets the designation "F", not because that's the note it raises to (that's just coincidence), but because it's "next" alphabetically in the "copedent-building" sequence after the above.
Thanks Brint, so if I make myself a little cross reference where d, e, and f = my LKL, LKR, etc, that should minimize my confusion.

Posted: 12 Feb 2014 6:34 am
by Pete Nicholls
Thanks for all the other replies as well!

Posted: 12 Feb 2014 9:49 am
by Scott Duckworth
Pete, how do you like the book overall? I'm thinking about ordering one.

Posted: 12 Feb 2014 10:26 am
by Pete Nicholls
Well worth the 7.19 I paid for it at Amazon!!

Posted: 12 Feb 2014 10:49 am
by Scott Duckworth
Thanks Pete!

Posted: 12 Feb 2014 12:08 pm
by b0b
The "e" in this tab is a half-step lower of the 2nd string, D# to D. It gives you the C note at the 10th fret.

The chord with the flats is a C diminished, 2nd inversion (Gb C Eb Gb).

8va

Posted: 15 Aug 2014 1:21 am
by Ron Leegate
8va means to play one octave higher than notated.
8ba means to play one octave lower than notated.

There also is 15va and 15ba which indicate two octave changes below and above respective.

Posted: 15 Aug 2014 8:15 am
by Richard Sinkler
It's hard to believe that there is no copedent listed in the book to explain what knee lever he is talking about when he says E lever, D lever etc... I have never seen any book or tab that didn't. Although some tab doesn't refer to pedals and levers by letter, and just uses flat (b) or sharp (#) symbols after the fret number to indicate how many half steps up or down that the pedal or lever moves the string.

Posted: 15 Aug 2014 8:20 am
by Tom Gorr
Richard, the sharp and flat at fret really needs adopted as a universal standard IMO.

Posted: 15 Aug 2014 8:49 am
by Mike Perlowin
Tom Gorr wrote:Richard, the sharp and flat at fret really needs adopted as a universal standard IMO.
Too bad Jimmie Crawford's Musim-tab system never caught on. IMO it was the best tab system ever devised.

Posted: 15 Aug 2014 12:23 pm
by Ian Rae
Tom, I find the sharp and flat thing really confusing because I read music. In the E tuning there aren't really any flats except arguably in certain diminished chords, and when I see a sharp I'm likely to think "so what - it's sharp already". R for raise and L for lower cause me no confusion.

Posted: 15 Aug 2014 12:53 pm
by Lane Gray
Surely, Ian, it wouldn't confuse if you saw it next to the fret number on tab?
I mean if you see "5##' on the 5th string line of a piece of tab, you'd know that means to add the A pedal, double-sharping the E note of a B string at the 5th fret.

Posted: 15 Aug 2014 2:48 pm
by Stuart Legg
Folks number and alphabetize things but the number and the letter serve no other purpose than a temporary label for their own use.

The first thing to learn is how your pedals and levers affect the strings.
Then when you see one of those labels on a certain string you know if you have a pedal or lever that affects that string and what options you have to raise or lower the pitch.

At this point by knowing your pedals and levers you can make a very good guess which option you should use and your ear should tell you if you selected wrong.
So once you get it right make a note of the authors labels and you’re all set.

Note: If a person would learn notation they would not have to guess about anything written within the tab.

Posted: 16 Aug 2014 6:10 am
by Ian Rae
Lane, you're quite right, given some thinking time. But at reading speed a # next to a note which I know is already a sharp tells me "take no action" rather than "sharp it some more". I admit I am in a minority of people burdened with too much musical syntax. Still voting for R & L :)

Posted: 16 Aug 2014 8:56 am
by b0b
Good point, Ian.

Thinking it over, I can see how # and b can be ambiguous. Those symbols are already in use on the chord chart and sheet music. For example, 7# on the 4th string of tab gives you a C natural note. The letter names of pedals are also ambiguous: 7F is a C note and 8B is an F. Confusing!

That's a strong case for using R and RR (for raises) and L and LL (for lowers) in tab.

Posted: 16 Aug 2014 1:21 pm
by Ian Rae
I have a book of tabs by Don Sulesky which uses A and B for the pedals, which helps you keep track of the lines on the page, then for the levers he just uses R and L. This seems a good compromise to me. It's hard to get lost or confused. I think all Ls and Rs would be a bit featureless, now I think about it. The As and Bs keep your bearings.

Posted: 16 Aug 2014 6:17 pm
by Dan Robinson
b0b wrote:The "e" in this tab is a half-step lower of the 2nd string, D# to D. It gives you the C note at the 10th fret.

The chord with the flats is a C diminished, 2nd inversion (Gb C Eb Gb).
The Sho-Bud I got in 1973 originally had that change on RKR, then with more pressure it lowered #2 another half-step to C#.

Posted: 16 Aug 2014 9:06 pm
by Ron Pruter
I wonder why he avoids sting 5 on the C dim. All notes are good but 1,7 and 9, if you are dropping 9 with your (e lever also)

Posted: 16 Aug 2014 9:55 pm
by Ian Rae
Maybe if you're using it to get from a I to a V7 you don't need the A - all I can think of.