Gathering mechanical steel guitar data for an invention
Posted: 1 Jul 2013 3:27 am
I have made an invention for the pedal steel which I would like to market. It is a mechanical switch that provides a second set of changes to any pedal or knee lever, without the necessity to do invasive changes to the guitar such as drilling holes in the body, or adding or exchanging crossrods etc. The actual operating switch of the whole assembly toggles between these two sets of changes and is mounted to the crossrod of the respective pedal or lever. That means the switch has to be operated without eye control, but with everything else with playing this instrument, muscle memory takes care of that, with the switch sticking out of the array of bellcranks a little to aid switching.
My current concern is to determine and maximize cross-brand compatibility while keeping the number of parts as low as possible. To that end I have posted online an Excel Sheet at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... sp=sharing , listing some relevant mechanical data of brands of pedal steels. It is an interactive sheet that anyone can help fill in. Currently, the sheet is still fairly empty, but I'd very thankful if Forum members helped with gathering as much data as possible.
So far, I have installed the prototypes in a Carter (square crossrod 3/8") for tests. Installation in two different models of Mullen (hexagonal crossrods of different diameters) and a Fessenden (square 5/16) will follow shortly. The most important data are exact diameter of crossrod, minimal distance between crossrods, minimal clearing under crossrod. The measurements should be taken with a slide gauge if possible in order to determine maximum deviations from nominal diameters such as 3/8, or 5/16. My aim is also to maximize pullrod compatibility, but diameter measurements make only sense with pullrods that have a 90-degree bend at the end because that is the type of pullrod the switch uses.
When mechanical compatibility with a certain brand/model of guitar is given, the only mechanical limitation I see is the number of vacant holes in the changer fingers. On the other hand, most 3-raise/3-lower changers and standard setups should be able to accommodate an additional change on a single lever or pedal.
Currently, there are four brands/models of steels that are grayed out on the Excel Sheet, which means they are definitely not compatible with the switch: BMI, Moyo, and push-pull guitars. Furthermore, the compatibility of round crossrods is as yet questionable as long as diameters are unknown (to me).
The idea to ask the manufacturers for the data has crossed my mind, but I think they are busy enough with building.... But of course, if they read this, their entries are most welcome.
I would also like to thank Forum member Carl Dixon for his generosity in sharing his thoughts and pictures relating to his mechanical solution of the 'switch problem' a few years ago. However, I would like to point out that my solution bears no resemblance at all to Carl's switch.
Thank you very much for your contribution or input!
My current concern is to determine and maximize cross-brand compatibility while keeping the number of parts as low as possible. To that end I have posted online an Excel Sheet at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... sp=sharing , listing some relevant mechanical data of brands of pedal steels. It is an interactive sheet that anyone can help fill in. Currently, the sheet is still fairly empty, but I'd very thankful if Forum members helped with gathering as much data as possible.
So far, I have installed the prototypes in a Carter (square crossrod 3/8") for tests. Installation in two different models of Mullen (hexagonal crossrods of different diameters) and a Fessenden (square 5/16) will follow shortly. The most important data are exact diameter of crossrod, minimal distance between crossrods, minimal clearing under crossrod. The measurements should be taken with a slide gauge if possible in order to determine maximum deviations from nominal diameters such as 3/8, or 5/16. My aim is also to maximize pullrod compatibility, but diameter measurements make only sense with pullrods that have a 90-degree bend at the end because that is the type of pullrod the switch uses.
When mechanical compatibility with a certain brand/model of guitar is given, the only mechanical limitation I see is the number of vacant holes in the changer fingers. On the other hand, most 3-raise/3-lower changers and standard setups should be able to accommodate an additional change on a single lever or pedal.
Currently, there are four brands/models of steels that are grayed out on the Excel Sheet, which means they are definitely not compatible with the switch: BMI, Moyo, and push-pull guitars. Furthermore, the compatibility of round crossrods is as yet questionable as long as diameters are unknown (to me).
The idea to ask the manufacturers for the data has crossed my mind, but I think they are busy enough with building.... But of course, if they read this, their entries are most welcome.
I would also like to thank Forum member Carl Dixon for his generosity in sharing his thoughts and pictures relating to his mechanical solution of the 'switch problem' a few years ago. However, I would like to point out that my solution bears no resemblance at all to Carl's switch.
Thank you very much for your contribution or input!