Page 1 of 2

Eric Heywood - Great action shot of live steeling

Posted: 30 Apr 2013 10:28 am
by John Scanlon
Watching Eric Heywood, one of my personal favs on the PSG, play along with Ray LaMontagne live on Letterman.

His solo is from 2:58 to 3:22.

In the middle of the solo, from about 3:08 to 3:12, there is a great camera angle of him doing a run up the fretboard. The shot is from behind his right hand, and if you watch the changer fingers, you can see the strings being lowered and raised as he makes his run up. Really great shot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mhz_MYkxIXw

Posted: 30 Apr 2013 12:29 pm
by Miguel Saldana
Thanks for the post. Its an interesting camera angle, and I enjoyed the playing as well.

Posted: 30 Apr 2013 6:00 pm
by Steve Pawlak
Very good band
I really like the bass line too

Posted: 30 Apr 2013 7:25 pm
by John Scanlon
Yeah, the band is killer. This guy hasn't really been on my radar for a few years until I ran across his "Storytellers" on Palladia the other night. I've been mesmerized ever since. Plus, like I said, I love Eric Heywood.

Williams

Posted: 1 May 2013 9:20 am
by Michael Robertson
I love the tone of that Williams plus it is nice to see an appropriate dress code for the steeler as well as the others.
Great music and a great presentation.
Thanks

Posted: 3 May 2013 11:58 am
by Roy Thomson
Those Beautiful sounds just made my cocktail hour!
The Williams and the player both great! Thanks for
posting.

RT

Posted: 3 May 2013 12:08 pm
by b0b
I love the visual effect of the Williams changer fingers. When I was playing a Williams and someone asked "What do the pedals do?", I'd point to changer and say "Watch!". Most people got it real quick.

Posted: 4 May 2013 7:02 am
by chris ivey
he made that williams sound like a thin toned jerry garcia.
i've heard his and ray's name alot. they seemed a little tentative.
i don't get it. how do all these people get names, press, spots on letterman ..and then come up with a weak performance. i just expect more under the circumstances. and i keep telling myself not to say anything but then can't help myself.

Posted: 5 May 2013 1:26 am
by Finbarr O'Sullivan
I agree with Chris again whats wrong with me. :(

Posted: 5 May 2013 4:10 am
by Ransom Beers
They're just holding back for the "BIG" finish(whatever that is) :?

Posted: 5 May 2013 8:08 am
by b0b
This sounds really good to me, Chris. I'd be proud to play in a band like that, and to get that steel tone on a concert stage. It's the classic folk rock sound.

Maybe you just don't like this kind of music compared to, say, country or blues. That's no reason to knock it down. This was not a "weak performance" - it was absolutely true to the singer/songwriter folk rock genre.

The steel part was spot on, in my opinion. Notice how the whole band kicks together at the end of his solo at 3:16. Weak performance, my ass!

Posted: 5 May 2013 8:32 am
by chris ivey
darn it! i knew i should have kept quiet. now i've got the voice from above raining down on me.

Posted: 6 May 2013 6:33 am
by John Scanlon
Nothing wrong with you, Finbarr, or with Chris - like Chris said, he just doesn't get it. That's fine - there's a lot of music out there I don't get, either. However, this guy's on Letterman, and has played on a ton of great records, and we're sitting here talking about it. One of us is doing it right, and it ain't us, or it ain't me, at least.

I'm glad b0b and I do get this, though. Very tight and very tasty. I think the steel was extremely appropriate for the tune, and the playing served the song very well. Anything "more" wouldn't have been right for the song. Personally, I really dig these kinds of tube tones, too, with just a shade of the edge of amp breakup, as totally clean solid state just doesn't always do it for me. There's definitely more than one way to skin a cat. In an interview I read, Heywood said he kind of developed his steeling independently of the "steel fraternity" and all the Nashville licks that the rest of us try to learn. Makes sense to me that he'd sound like he does.

Beg Steal Or Borrow

Posted: 6 May 2013 7:06 am
by Roger Shackelton
There is a much better performance of this tune on "The Jimmy Kimmel Show" from about 6 months ago.
Eric gets alot of face time & seems like he plays more on this tune. 8)
I'm unable to locate it again. :?:

Roger

Posted: 6 May 2013 7:21 am
by John Scanlon
Yeah, I've seen it done other places, too, but I initially posted this b/c of the great camera angle on that shot mentioned above. I don't think the Kimmel appearance has the same shot.

Posted: 7 May 2013 6:37 am
by Clyde Mattocks
At last, a TV show with the steel up in the mix! Nice.

Posted: 7 May 2013 7:17 am
by David Mason
You can play behind the beat and not be "wrong." If anything, I'd say they were all behind it, exactly together, like a "click in the ear." Which I had thought of as "swing", though it can manifest as "sloppy" too :P .... One of the great indignities of the modern age is the reliance upon click tracks, because some great bands used to "breathe", i.e. speed up and slow down together with great results. And horrible too, but that's a whole 'nother thing.

Posted: 8 May 2013 1:42 am
by Bob Carlucci
I liked it.. Its NOT about technical wizardry.. Todays alt country and neo folk performers could certainly hire a "better" steel player.. However Heywood has a great discography, better than many much more technically advanced players.. Artists choose players that match their sound and style.... bob

Posted: 8 May 2013 7:41 am
by Curt Trisko
When you guys talk about the technicality of steel guitar playing, are you talking about chicken pickin'? If the ability to play fast and sharp is the main criteria, then there's a problem. I don't think most people have a taste for that kind of sound out of a steel guitar anymore.

Regarding the tone of Heywood's playing, I had always thought that was just the different kind of tone that a Williams guitar produced.

Posted: 8 May 2013 12:19 pm
by Tony Glassman
It's not my cup of tea either, but who am I to criticize? He's the guy playing on David Letterman and I'm the guy sitting at home in a recliner.

Posted: 8 May 2013 12:37 pm
by John Scanlon
I'm with the bobs (b0b and Bob).

Here's another example of Heywood's tone that I adore, and I'm sure may be reviled by some purists around here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIHtFySoo6U (warning - banjo content).

Solos are at 2:23-2:54 and 3:53-4:10.

No, not the perfectly clean sound oft discussed here, but just a tad of the edge-of-tube-breakup sound that I think works really well on PSG, esp. against a few other acoustic instruments and no other electric guitar.

Posted: 8 May 2013 1:17 pm
by b0b
What does "technically advanced" mean, when discussing a sideman's performance? The art of commercial music requires one to suppress the urge to overplay, to simplify one's melodic parts for the less educated ear. Nowhere is this more true than in folk-rock, where the music is often simply a vehicle for the singer/songwriter's poetic lyrics.

I see nothing in these performances to indicate that any of the musicians are not "technically advanced". This isn't jazz. They stay true to form. It's a job, and they do it well.

Posted: 8 May 2013 1:38 pm
by Tommy Janiga
John Scanlon wrote:Here's another example of Heywood's tone that I adore, and I'm sure may be reviled by some purists around here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIHtFySoo6U
Thanks John - I loved that clip - great sound! That may be my favorite Son Volt song, and it's on my daily practice playlist, too.

Posted: 8 May 2013 8:08 pm
by Alex Cattaneo
I love Eric's playing with Ray Lamontagne. Thanks for posting John.

Posted: 9 May 2013 7:28 am
by Tim Tyner
Very nice!Thanks John.This gentleman played exactly what was needed in this performance,no more,no less.Very tasteful playing.I enjoyed it very much.I liked the six string playing as well.Many times less is more,a lesson I have to remind myself of often.