Page 1 of 1

Fender 400-8 Tuning

Posted: 16 May 2010 9:22 am
by Greg Youngman
Please be easy on me. I just acquired a 1967 Fender 400 8 string, 6 pedal from Chuck Foreman's estate. If it was yours, would you stick with the A6 tuning in the book (E,C#,A,F#,E,C#,A,F#) or something else? Plus, what pedal arrangement might you start with?

Thanks

Image

Re: Fender 400-8 Tuning

Posted: 16 May 2010 10:02 am
by Earnest Bovine
Greg Youngman wrote: would you stick with the E9 tuning in the book (E,C#,A,F#,E,C#,A,F#) or something else?
That's an A6 tuning.
Check out the E9 tunings posted on the Forum. I would suggest copying the common 10 string tuning, an omitting the first 2 strings F# and D#. Instead of the knee levers you see there, you can use your right foot on pedal 4,5,6.
It' so quick and easy to change the pedal functions on those Fenders.

Posted: 16 May 2010 10:32 am
by Greg Youngman
Earnest. Yes... I was thinking A6 and typed E9. Thanks for the E9 suggestions. I'll give that a try. The pedal function changes do look easy and could provide some interesting options.

Ulric. I wasn't aware that Fender had a good steel forum. Thanks.

Posted: 16 May 2010 1:13 pm
by Joel Meredith
http://z8.invisionfree.com/Fender_Steel ... index.php?

Fender Steel forum
Sneaky's B6 works out well on these Fenders as well, which is what I play.

Posted: 16 May 2010 1:53 pm
by Ryan Barwin
If you want to use E9th, something like this would work pretty well...

Image


I'd use a C6th setup...something like this...

Image

Of course one of the cool things about those old Fenders is you can change the whole pedal setup in about 10 minutes, which you can't do with most guitars. So it's easy to experiment a lot with it.

Posted: 16 May 2010 2:04 pm
by Greg Youngman
Joel: Thanks for the link.

Ryan: That chart looks great. Now that I've studied a few of these, yours is making great sense. TNX.

I just changed the stings and got it tuned. I see I need to do a bit of cleaning (probably should have done that before the strings) and the pedals will be next. I can't figure out how he had them setup, but it doesn't matter. They were out of whack.

I appreciate the time you all took to respond to my post.

Posted: 16 May 2010 4:52 pm
by Danny Bates
Greg, If you ever come up this way, let's hook up. It's been too long my friend.

Not trying to blow smoke but Greg is one of those guys that is naturally talented. He could sing, play guitar, piano and bass (and operate a recording studio) when he was just 15 years old. I'm talking about a guy that has Paul McCartney caliber talent... He's unreal!

We better do all we can to keep a steel guitar away from him. :lol:

Motton E. Few lives :lol: (inside joke)

Posted: 17 May 2010 6:30 am
by Greg Youngman
Hey Dan!

Thanks for the smoke. You've got the talent too. Why do you think I hooked up with you back then? You knew all the augmented, suspended, diminished chords. I didn't have a clue and sometimes still don't.

I revisit those old master tapes from the late sixties. We wrote some really good songs.

Didn't Motton E. Few evolve from another band name idea we had... Motley Crew (roughly-organized assembly of characters)? They didn't even get it until 1981! God, we were ahead of our time! Email me.

Posted: 27 May 2010 2:19 pm
by Greg Youngman
I'm tracking my first pedal overdubs today. This isn't as easy as some of you guys make it look.