I'm a beginner and I am having trouble getting my "C" pedal to sound right. My steel has the "C" pedal set up with one bellcrank pulling strings 4 and 5. Is this common? What do most players have?
I know that most of the problem is me, I just want to be sure that I'm not learning on a steel with an oddball setup.
E9 "C" pedal, Emmons setup, one bellcrank or two?
Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 8 Jun 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: New Hampshire, USA
- Ryan Barwin
- Posts: 613
- Joined: 7 Aug 2009 12:23 pm
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
- Scott Swartz
- Posts: 1038
- Joined: 23 Jan 2001 1:01 am
- Location: St. Louis, MO
- Contact:
I have my Williams set up like this, it will depend on the design of your rod/bellcranks.
The Williams bellcranks can accept the rods from either "side" and when you do this they come out the same as the changer spacing so no problem there.
The B and E strings will require different leverage at the bellcrank so that does not create an issue either, I use hole 3 for the B string and hole 5 for the E.
The Williams bellcranks can accept the rods from either "side" and when you do this they come out the same as the changer spacing so no problem there.
The B and E strings will require different leverage at the bellcrank so that does not create an issue either, I use hole 3 for the B string and hole 5 for the E.
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 8 Jun 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: New Hampshire, USA
It is an EMCI SD10. The bellcranks work with rods from either side. I think I will try messing around with the "C" pedal height, because the notes seem to move together pretty well, and the action isn't too stiff, (what do I know right?
The pedal height is now lower than the "B" so I'll start there. I think I need to bring it up higher.
Thanks for the replies, I'll check back later with the results. I just didn't want to be playing around with a setup that was doomed from the start. So thanks again.
The pedal height is now lower than the "B" so I'll start there. I think I need to bring it up higher.
Thanks for the replies, I'll check back later with the results. I just didn't want to be playing around with a setup that was doomed from the start. So thanks again.
-
- Posts: 757
- Joined: 7 Apr 2009 10:02 am
- Location: Tennessee, USA
I think Scott Swartz is right. If your rods go through the side of the crank, and can go through either side, one crank does the job just fine. Less parts, less clutter, less weight, are all good things. You wouldn't need both rods in the same hole anyway, so why use the extra part? I think your problem is either the choice of holes used in the crank, the choice of connecting holes in the pedal or pedal rod connection, or the pedal is hitting the floor befor it hits the stop.
-
- Posts: 6437
- Joined: 2 Dec 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Upstate SC.