Newbies! Starter vs Stage One
Posted: 28 Jul 2008 5:24 pm
My new Stage One just arrived today, and I am in the position of having both the Stage One and a Carter Starter side by side for comparison, so from a raw newbie, here is a quick comparison for those of you in the market for a student guitar.
Price:
Musicians Friend sells a new Carter Starter for $795. A Stage One is $949.
Caveat: The Starter I have been playing on is used.
The first difference that stands out is that a Stage One comes with a very nice hard case. The Starter comes with a gig bag. A hard case is extra. The leg bag is also higher quality from Stage One.
The Stage One has heavy chrome adjustable legs vs lighter weight aluminum looking legs on the Starter, with one leg having a screw out adjustment for leveling only. The pedal bar is wood on the Carter, aluminum on the Stage One. Pedals and pedal rods apear very similar on both guitars.
The Stage One seems about eight pounds heavier, which translates to a much more stable robust feeling when playing, especially when using the levers. There is about a quarter the flex in the Stage One, leading to a feeling of quality compared to the Carter.
The under side of the guitars yeald some more differences. The materials are similar, with the levers being angled aluminum on both guitars. The RKL lever on the Carter was bent. The Stage One has nylon stops vs screw heads on the Carter. The changer fingers on the Carter are flat metal. The Studio One uses angled fingers for a much stronger appearance. I haven't heard of changer problems on the Carter, so this may not be a big deal. The Stage One is flocked. The Carter is painted black on the underside of the body.
Bodies of both guitars are maple. Carters come in black. Stage Ones are offered in colors. Mine is wineberry with a black top. Classy looking.
Keyheads are similar on both guitars, with none of that fancy looking stairstep design found on pro guitars. A HUGE difference is that tuners are Grovers on the Stage One vs pings on the Carter. The pings do work, but the feel is cheap.
The rollers on the nut are about four times the diameter on the Stage One. I don't know what this means, except the design difference stuck out. Neck is wood on the Carter, brushed aluminum on the Stage One. The Stage One also has a classy looking colored board vs the black and white of the Carter. Totally cosmetic. PU is covered on the Stage One, not on the Carter. Both sound really fine. The top side of the changer on both guitars look well designed and substantial. One small detail that bugged me on the Carter is the jack is hidden under the guitar. The Stage One plugs in on the side.
So how do they play, you ask? The biggest difference is the stability of the Stage One. The pedal action is a bit smoother and quieter than the Starter. They both sound good, but I don't know how old the Starter's strings are, so will not make a judgement. Unplugged, the Stage One had a lot less undercarriage clatter. Both guitars stay in tune. I am 5' 11" and barely fit under the Carter. I have room to spare under the Stage One with legs that adjust.
So, the deal is this. There is no way I would buy a new Starter. Things become murkier when you can buy a used Starter for $500-$600. I have played a bit of steel and finger picked for a good many years, so I am reasonably sure I will be able to overcome the hurdles necessary to play PSG. If I was a flat picker, and had never played with a bar, you might want to pick up a used Starter, see if you like it, and trade up later, more so if you are starting out with no experience on a stringed instrument.
Doug Earnest builds a steel that has a quality feel to it. I feel I got my money's worth and more.
Now, if someone would just bring me an old MSA classic that hadn't been serviced in a while, we could address what another $500 would have bought me, but for now I'll be happy spending the difference on lessons. Hope this helps any of you fellow newbies out there trying to decide. I guess you can never go wrong buying the best you can afford. The Carter does everything you need, the Stage One does it better.....coming soon....chapter two.
Price:
Musicians Friend sells a new Carter Starter for $795. A Stage One is $949.
Caveat: The Starter I have been playing on is used.
The first difference that stands out is that a Stage One comes with a very nice hard case. The Starter comes with a gig bag. A hard case is extra. The leg bag is also higher quality from Stage One.
The Stage One has heavy chrome adjustable legs vs lighter weight aluminum looking legs on the Starter, with one leg having a screw out adjustment for leveling only. The pedal bar is wood on the Carter, aluminum on the Stage One. Pedals and pedal rods apear very similar on both guitars.
The Stage One seems about eight pounds heavier, which translates to a much more stable robust feeling when playing, especially when using the levers. There is about a quarter the flex in the Stage One, leading to a feeling of quality compared to the Carter.
The under side of the guitars yeald some more differences. The materials are similar, with the levers being angled aluminum on both guitars. The RKL lever on the Carter was bent. The Stage One has nylon stops vs screw heads on the Carter. The changer fingers on the Carter are flat metal. The Studio One uses angled fingers for a much stronger appearance. I haven't heard of changer problems on the Carter, so this may not be a big deal. The Stage One is flocked. The Carter is painted black on the underside of the body.
Bodies of both guitars are maple. Carters come in black. Stage Ones are offered in colors. Mine is wineberry with a black top. Classy looking.
Keyheads are similar on both guitars, with none of that fancy looking stairstep design found on pro guitars. A HUGE difference is that tuners are Grovers on the Stage One vs pings on the Carter. The pings do work, but the feel is cheap.
The rollers on the nut are about four times the diameter on the Stage One. I don't know what this means, except the design difference stuck out. Neck is wood on the Carter, brushed aluminum on the Stage One. The Stage One also has a classy looking colored board vs the black and white of the Carter. Totally cosmetic. PU is covered on the Stage One, not on the Carter. Both sound really fine. The top side of the changer on both guitars look well designed and substantial. One small detail that bugged me on the Carter is the jack is hidden under the guitar. The Stage One plugs in on the side.
So how do they play, you ask? The biggest difference is the stability of the Stage One. The pedal action is a bit smoother and quieter than the Starter. They both sound good, but I don't know how old the Starter's strings are, so will not make a judgement. Unplugged, the Stage One had a lot less undercarriage clatter. Both guitars stay in tune. I am 5' 11" and barely fit under the Carter. I have room to spare under the Stage One with legs that adjust.
So, the deal is this. There is no way I would buy a new Starter. Things become murkier when you can buy a used Starter for $500-$600. I have played a bit of steel and finger picked for a good many years, so I am reasonably sure I will be able to overcome the hurdles necessary to play PSG. If I was a flat picker, and had never played with a bar, you might want to pick up a used Starter, see if you like it, and trade up later, more so if you are starting out with no experience on a stringed instrument.
Doug Earnest builds a steel that has a quality feel to it. I feel I got my money's worth and more.
Now, if someone would just bring me an old MSA classic that hadn't been serviced in a while, we could address what another $500 would have bought me, but for now I'll be happy spending the difference on lessons. Hope this helps any of you fellow newbies out there trying to decide. I guess you can never go wrong buying the best you can afford. The Carter does everything you need, the Stage One does it better.....coming soon....chapter two.