Page 1 of 3

Carter vs. Williams

Posted: 3 Jun 2008 7:48 am
by Rick Winfield
I've been researching new PSG's on the web, and I find that the Williams Co. offers mica or lacquered maple bodies, as well as key or keyless for about $100 over the basic Carter prices,which are keyed and mica. Are there any opinions on which company is preferred ?
thanks
Rick

Posted: 3 Jun 2008 7:54 am
by Antolina
For my money I'd take the Williams over the Carter "basic". No comparison.

Posted: 3 Jun 2008 8:15 am
by Scott Swartz
I own one of each, and the mechanics, weight, reliability, and tuning stability are very similar.

The tone and ergonomics are different, and no post on a forum will be able to tell you if you will like it.

I could list out some pros and cons of each, but I consider those to be applicable to my personal preference only.

Bottom line, if I had a gig tonight I could take either guitar and be very happy.

As always when this type of thread comes up, you really need to get to a steel show and try them out

Posted: 3 Jun 2008 10:56 am
by Danny Bates
Rick, That's a tough call. I've never owned a Williams but I have admired their great looks and never heard a bad thing about them.

I don't personally care which guitar you buy but...

I do have a Carter D-10 with machined necks and Tonealigner pickups. It has a quality look, a nice full tone with lots of highs, great sustain (BCT) and it plays great. The guitar is lightweight and the action is incredible.

Over the years I've read nothing but great things about Bud Carter. I'm not sure, but I think he may have built more guitars than anybody else in this business. Many years ago I heard Bobby Black playing one live and loved the bite and tone he had.

Williams changer design

Posted: 3 Jun 2008 11:03 am
by Brad Malone
Rick, The Williams 600 Series has the most advanced changer system on the market..because of the advanced design the strings are bent less by the changer..do yourself a favor and check it out...I've had mine for 10 months and have not broken any strings. If you want something that is "leading edge", check out the Williams 600 Series.

Posted: 3 Jun 2008 12:09 pm
by Kevin Hatton
No. They both make excellent steel guitars. It all comes down to YOUR personal preference.

Posted: 3 Jun 2008 12:56 pm
by Rick Winfield
I've got 1 year in PSG,(MAY 07) so I'm lacking in experience. I appreciate ALL feedback and advice. Yes..I do need to go to a convention. They don't have PSG's around my neighborhood, and "hands on" means a lot, especially with PSG !!
I've been trying to learn on an old Marlen I bought on the forum,& I've come a long way, but I'd like to try something modern. Same sad story, money's tight, so...
thanks to all,
the information I gathered on this forum is priceless!
Rick

Posted: 3 Jun 2008 1:15 pm
by Danny Bates
Rick, The first year is the hardest. Congrats!

The Marlin is a great guitar. If bucks are tight, I would just get somebody to work on it and make it play and sound great.

Randy Gilliam has had both. Maybe he can chime in here

Steels

Posted: 3 Jun 2008 1:44 pm
by Randy Gilliam
Here Is a few I have Had 3 Derbys Great steels,Emmons Probably 25 or More Loved em all , WILLIAMS , MSA Old and New , Pedalmaster fulakwa , Rains, Lamar Really Nice Guitars, Shobud ,Promat 3 weeks Sound Great. I Like Buying and selling them. I Dont Think Any I Had were Bad. Forgot Several Mullen Also Sound good. I Only Have 1966 PP 1975 PP 1984 PP 2008 Derby, 2005 Lamar,2000 Emmons AllPull I am Pretty Low On stock But I will Get Some More .Randy 6Steel Gilliam Forgot Danny Bates stole My New Carter .

Posted: 3 Jun 2008 1:53 pm
by Danny Bates
Randy, I like your style! You forgot that I stole your '71 Emmons too.

Bobbe Seymour's owned more that 14,000 steel guitars... Randy, the way you're going, you should catch up with him by the end of the year! 8)

3 years

Posted: 3 Jun 2008 2:17 pm
by Rick Winfield
I'm looking foward to the day I can make it sound like a "steel guitar" !! Someone on the forum once posted that, "after you know a little about what you're doing, it'll take about 3 years to make it sound the way you want it too!! "
wooo weeee !!!!
only 2 more years?? :)
Actually, it's slowly starting to happen. I can hear things and know some of the moves.

Posted: 3 Jun 2008 2:47 pm
by Danny Bates
Rick, What you need is some encouragement from your neighbors.

About every 2 months or so, put your Marshall and your Peavey on the front porch. Turn each amp all the way up and put your bar on the first fret. Violently strum all the strings and slowly slide up to the changer. Your neighbors will be nice and encouraging from that day on. :lol:

Posted: 3 Jun 2008 3:10 pm
by b0b
They are different mechanically, but both are very well-built. One difference that pops out is the scale length. The Carter has a slightly shorter scale (24" vs 24ΒΌ").

Posted: 3 Jun 2008 5:47 pm
by David Armstrong
Hey Rick,
I'm really enjoying the DynaLap I bought from you. Thanks again!

Since I'm reading this forum, you might guess I'm getting interested in trying pedal steel. If my latest round of schooling goes well I'll be in the market this time next year! Hang on to your Marlen until then! :)

Dave

Which One???????????? Carter>>>>>>>W

Posted: 3 Jun 2008 8:10 pm
by Ernest Cawby
I have owned both, they are both very good, you can not go wrong with either.My Friend John Le Master plays a Carter and it sounds as good as any guitar I have ever heard, I am trying to sound and play like him, on my Williams, i AM getting closer day by day, may take another life time to do it tho.
I really liked the Carter and find no fault with one. But the Williams has more details I like better.
1. All Wood body, beautiful finish.
2. The Changer is new design and is beetter I think than any I have seen, it only slants about 17%, and have not broken a string yet, being fair I did not break a string on the Carter either.
3. All the moving parts is in bushings, which is smooth as silk.
4. Easy to change out pulls, Carter is easy also.
5. Williams Comes with adjustable flags on all levers, Carter padels cost $50.00 each, that would be $250.00 added to the cost.

The Carter and The Williams has a sound that is very good, But "John said after playing the williams for 3 hours, I can't get on my Carter what I am getting here" he ordered one.

Again if I only had a Carter I would be a happy camper, they work super. It is what fits you best, or personal choice.

ernie

Posted: 4 Jun 2008 6:51 am
by Rick Winfield
Danny:
It sounds like you've been to Jersey !!
ps: bottles make more noise when you chuck them in the trash ! :)_

Dave:
glad you're working on the dynalap. I learned a lot from it, but then: I got the PSG bug.
Ernest:
you seem to have "said it all" in your post,
thanks again to all

Posted: 5 Jun 2008 4:15 am
by Jani Peter Sandvik
I own a williams 600 series d10 and i loooooove it.
ive tried and played on a carter also but the low profile necks doesnt suit me

C vs W

Posted: 5 Jun 2008 4:26 am
by Billy Carr
One of the best sounding D-10's I ever had was a CARTER. 8 & 5, XR-16's on it. Black mica. My first D-10 Carter actually. Of course, the WILLIAMS guitars are nice, if you prefer lacquer, which I don't. Either one is a good purchase. I'm partial to a CARTER. I've had 7 new ones!

Posted: 5 Jun 2008 6:40 am
by Erv Niehaus
Guitars aside, I would rather deal with Bill Rudolph

than Ann Fabian. :(

Posted: 5 Jun 2008 6:46 am
by Nick Reed
Williams. . . . all the way

Posted: 5 Jun 2008 11:22 am
by Danny Bates
Click on the link below. Wait until the video loads and forward it to about 7 minutes. I bet you can't do this on a Williams. :lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsfgWcVb ... re=related

Posted: 5 Jun 2008 11:31 am
by Roger Crawford
Bet you wouldn't WANT to do that with a Williams!!!

Posted: 5 Jun 2008 12:47 pm
by Danny Bates
Roger, I have to laugh because I knew my post was "Flame Bait"... I've got ugly lap steels that I wouldn't do that to.

I'm not trying to start a war but you got to admit it is funny! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: 5 Jun 2008 1:39 pm
by b0b
Yeah, there's something about formica that invites abuse. I think the lacquer finish on my Williams is a bit too fragile for those kinds of antics. I really enjoy watching Rusty Young, though. 8)

POCO

Posted: 6 Jun 2008 9:22 am
by Rick Winfield
YA KNOW DANNY,
that kind of entertainment is why I sold my Les Paul and Strat and went into PSG. Rusty is talented, but... to my way of thinking, unfortunately, the music biz is more about entertainment(visual) than music (auditory). I can play like that on C6 and E9th, but in my opinion that's not what PSG is for. But to each his own !!
Look at Robert Randolph. Jimi Hendrix on steel? Hats off to him, and all that enjoy it, but it's not for me. I want the jazz chords, blues riffs, and that country crying !!!
what's next: lighting it on fire,(Hendrix) or smashing it(Townsend)
you sure got a lotta Jersey in ya :)
Rick