Page 1 of 2
Low E on E9
Posted: 15 Jan 2007 7:04 am
by Mark Butcher
I’m considering a copedant change on the bottom two strings changing the D for a B and the B for a low E. This would give me a nice fat power chord. I would slso get a sus2 on my F# string 7, a minor on its raise to G a Major on G# string 6 and sus4 on its raise to A. Not country I know but useful.
Before I also take the raise off string 10, now E, and try to lower string 9, now B to A on the A pedal to give a low root for the AB, do any of you experienced guys see any pitfalls I have not considered?
Thanks Guys
MArk
Posted: 15 Jan 2007 7:17 am
by Mike Wheeler
I don't see any problem as long as your changer can handle it. I chart that kind of stuff out on paper first to see if I'll run into any unexpected obstacles. Will you need split tuners, extra bellcranks, etc.?
Posted: 15 Jan 2007 7:40 am
by Dave Little
Mark,
I thought about the same thing, but realized that since I do a lot of single note stuff on the low B, D and E strings, the D on a lever would just not do it for me. I think an extended E9 (12 string) is the way to go. I won't be satisfied until I get one with about 8 pedals and 5 or 6 knees! That being said, I've read a few posts from guys who use what you are talking about. They seem to like it. I guess it really depends on what type of music you play.
Dave Little
PS: A lot of discussion here:
http://steelguitarforum.com/Forum5/HTML/014093.html
and
http://steelguitarforum.com/Forum15/HTML/013877.html
Low E on E9
Posted: 15 Jan 2007 8:02 am
by Robbie Daniels
I get the best of both worlds with my D12 extended E9
Posted: 15 Jan 2007 8:22 am
by Mark Butcher
I have been playing on only 7 strings E to D# for a while to simplify finding my way in the strings, particularly if I'm trying to read tab and look at my bar hand. It helped a lot. So I don't miss the D & B and with B&E I can get to the bass notes I want most.
A 12 string sounds too complicated and even harder to find my way round. I don't have one either! I'm hoping that I can take the rod from the tenth string raise and move it to the ninth string lower to get my B to A, anything more than that would frighten me off.
Thanks for the heads up to the other strings Dave.
Mark
Posted: 15 Jan 2007 9:29 am
by Roger Shackelton
Mark, I believe Larry Behm has been playing this set-up for a few years now. Perhaps you should direct your questions to him.
Posted: 15 Jan 2007 10:13 am
by Michael Johnstone
Try this:
http://www.hereintown.net/~shobud75/ads ... tuning.jpg
I got it off Ernie Pollock's website and it looks like just the ticket.If I had a spare S-10 around I'd probably try it myself and travel light to rock and roll gigs.
Posted: 15 Jan 2007 11:12 am
by Jon Light
Bingo--I was about to link you up to Ernie Pollack's 10 string 'universal' but Michael got there first. I play nothing but 12 string but I keep meaning to try this on a 10 string I've got sitting here. There are some compromises, for sure. Just a question of which compromises better suit what you are looking for, musically.
Posted: 16 Jan 2007 2:08 am
by Jerry Hayes
If I only had a S-10, I'd probably set it up like this with the bottom two strings tuned to B and E.......
LKL.....would either lower both B's to A# or both G#'s to G, I prefer the B to A# lowers though........
LKR.....lower the 2nd string D# to D, and the 8th string E to D..
P1......raise the 5th and 9th B strings to C#......
P2.....raise the 3rd and 6th G# strings to A.....
P3......raise the 5th string B to C# and the 6th string G# to A#, this is a standard Uni change and very useful with the E's lowered or not........
RKL.....this would raise the 4th and 8th E strings to F and lower the 10th string E to C#........
RKR.....this would lower the 2nd string D# to C# and lower the 4th and 8th E strings to D#.......
Sort of a "mini" universal tuning.........JH in Va.
Got It!
Posted: 16 Jan 2007 5:00 am
by Ernie Pollock
Mark: I have been using that tuning for a long time, I do lower the 10th E to a D on one of the levers, of course raise the 9th B to D when I need it. Works great. I have put this tuning on 'All Pull' guitars and 'Pull Release' guitars with no problem at all. I like to sing & play & love having those power chords with that low E string. Works for me!!
Ernie Pollock
http://www.hereintown.net/~shobud75/stock.htm
Posted: 17 Jan 2007 1:21 pm
by Chick Donner
Couple of guys here in northern Ohio been doing it for years (Freddie Little and Roger Mullinex). They pedal the B up to D, and put G# and E on 9 & 10. Been trying for years to get them to join me on D12 and just be done with it.
Roger's on this forum. Email him, he-s got ideas for you.
12 string
Posted: 17 Jan 2007 8:03 pm
by Donald Dunlavey
12 string, 12 string, 12 string, Big sound, many options.
Posted: 18 Jan 2007 1:34 am
by Dan Tyack
That's what I have been doing on my E9th for a while. There are a *bunch* of Sacred Steel things that fall out with this tuning.
An important change: on the same knee lever that you raise your 1st (or 1st and 2nd) string, lower the low F# to E. This gives you a lap steel tuning on the bottom 8 strings of the instrument.
I don't miss the low D at all (I can always get it with a knee lever).
Posted: 18 Jan 2007 10:53 am
by Doug Childress
I used the 9 (G#) and 10 (E) on a couple of setups. Lately I have gone to a 12 string extended E9 with the standard E9th tuning on strings 1 - 10 and have the G# on 11 and E on 12. The 10 string setup you mentioned was easy to play but I missed hearing some of the E9th string combinations that I liked. The 10 string setup I had also removed the D# second and moved the G# third into the second string position. With this setup the E's were on strings 3 and 7 with the B's on 4 and 8. Took a little getting used to but it worked very well.
Posted: 18 Jan 2007 12:00 pm
by Dan Tyack
It depends on what you are going for, but I greatly prefer having the low B down there instead of a low G#. It's better for doing 'rhythm steel' (IMHO).
Posted: 18 Jan 2007 12:58 pm
by Mike Shefrin
deleted
Posted: 18 Jan 2007 2:26 pm
by Dan Tyack
adding the low E and moving the low B to the 'D slot' is really, really easy. So easy that I did it myself (and I am as bad a pedal steel mechanic as they come).
And you can play AC/DC rhythm on your pedal steel:
Girl's Got Ryhthm
Posted: 18 Jan 2007 3:14 pm
by Mike Shefrin
deleted
Posted: 18 Jan 2007 5:48 pm
by Larry Behm
Yes thanks to Dan I too have a low E, it took me about 2 minutes to get use to it and would never go back. Thanks Dan
Larry Behm
in my opinion...
Posted: 18 Jan 2007 10:29 pm
by Bobby Lee
the low E is required if you want to play steel in a rock band. Otherwise you can't get any good power chords.
Posted: 19 Jan 2007 6:22 am
by Dave Ristrim
Precisely why I am stuck with a 12 string tuning. Gotta love that low E.
Posted: 19 Jan 2007 6:53 am
by Mark Butcher
Thanks for all the suggestions guys. I managed, just, to fit a 56 gauge in the tenth slot which I seemed to need to get a good twang, and have a 38 at the ninth with a raise from B to C# on the A pedal. It sure changes the whole feel of the instrument, I have to force myself to stop grabbing those power and sustained chords all the time.
Mark
Posted: 19 Jan 2007 7:11 am
by Dave Ristrim
Yeah, a .056 would be nice. I use a .052 or a .054 because I get less bar noise from the smaller gauges. That seems to be the only drawback to adding low strings.
Rock on!
Low string bar noise
Posted: 19 Jan 2007 11:42 am
by Bobby Lee
I use the thumb of my left hand to mute the low strings when I'm not playing them. That minimizes the bar noise that Dave is talking about, but maybe I'm not as sensitive to it as he is. I'm sure that there's still some noise - it just doesn't bother me.
Posted: 19 Jan 2007 2:13 pm
by Dave Ristrim
Yeah Bobby Lee, I also mute those strings. But, I still get bar noise on the low strings especially when sustaining notes out for a long time with vibrato. I've been living with it for many many years, so I guess it's not that big of a deal to me. It usually only bugs me when recording.
I still prefer the 12 string Ext. E9 over the 10 string.
Later, Dave