<SMALL>like the music that hippie long-hair drunken drug-addict Gram Parsons played... </SMALL>
Ahhhh-take away the long hair and you could easily be talking about Hank Sr, at least in terms of his tendency for substance abuse.
Actually, Parsons was pretty stone country-at least according to Chris Hillman, who oddly enough was regarded as the most country of the two, probably because of his skill on a mandolin. I can look up the actual quote, it's in a book I have here-but it's Hillman taking exception to Parsons reputation as the father of country rock (this bothered Hillman no end.) and he says something to the order of Parsons not having any rock in him at all-He was stone Country through and through.
I imagine there's no answer to this-at least not musically. There are those that would say anything beyond a I IV V progression is not classic country, but that would leave out the aforementioned Hank Sr.
It's a generational thing. The bands my niece listens to now that call themselves Rock bands are awful. Got one good song that got 'em signed and then they're gone. Bands I used to HATE in High School are better than what's on the radio now, and they all had longer careers. She thinks Destiny's Child is better than the Supremes. Ah well-she's wrong, but you can't tell her that.
I'm sure that there's the same thing at work here. Those that grew up on Hank Sr, ET, Conway, Loretta, etc call that country. I grew up on Gram Parsons, The Byrds, NRPS, Commander Cody, Jerry Jeff Walker, Michael Murphy, and Pure Prairie League. To me they're just as country as the rest of them. Trust me, one day Garth WILL be considered classic country by a large section of the public-probably because at least he used steel and fiddles.
John
------------------
Fulawka D-10 9&5
"All in all, looking back, I'd have to say the best advice anyone ever gave me was 'Hands Up, Don't Move!"
www.johnbarnold.com/pedalsteel
<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by JB Arnold on 21 January 2002 at 01:53 PM.]</p></FONT>