Page 17 of 172

Free Pictures

Posted: 13 Jan 2008 4:00 pm
by Lowell Whitney
Wow! Free pictures of nothing. :whoa: Wait a minute, how would you know if they have faded????? :?
LW

Posted: 13 Jan 2008 5:03 pm
by Scott Shipley
Bob Hickish wrote: "Now ! that makes this entire discussion pointless!" :lol:
That means this whole thread was for nothing?
:|

Posted: 14 Jan 2008 7:40 am
by David L. Donald
Well if nothing is funny,
at least it's fun! ;)

Posted: 15 Jan 2008 10:29 am
by Carroll Hale
Jon Jaffe wrote:This must be a consensus.
or maybe a conspiracy..... :D

Posted: 15 Jan 2008 6:03 pm
by Richard Damron
I must have nature's only perfect vacuum between my ears since I apparently read 17 pages of nothing and remember none of it.

Posted: 15 Jan 2008 6:26 pm
by David Doggett
If you remember nothing, then you remember all of it. I can't remember nothing. But I do remember something. :)

Posted: 15 Jan 2008 7:23 pm
by Steve Norman
you guys are all wrong! Im sick of this!


oh wait wrong thread,,

Posted: 15 Jan 2008 9:10 pm
by David Doggett
I don't think I'm wrong about nothing. And there's certainly nothing wrong with something. Um...wait, who's on third? :?

Posted: 16 Jan 2008 4:21 am
by Larry Strawn
What???? No wait,, he's on first! :lol:

I can't get nothing right! :D

Yes, I have no Bananas

Posted: 16 Jan 2008 5:28 am
by David L. Donald
Most of us are getting older here.
We forget some things;
well everybody but Al Marcus... ;)

So, is what we have forgotten
something or nothing?

If you ain't worried about it gone missing,
was it nothing to begin with?

If we don't remember it,
should we be worried about nothing?

Posted: 16 Jan 2008 4:49 pm
by Archie Nicol
I just noticed this thread was started on July 21st 2007. My 50th birthday!
What did youse get me?...........?
Yep. Thought as much. :roll:

Arch.

Posted: 16 Jan 2008 5:40 pm
by Scott Shipley
David Doggett wrote: And there's certainly nothing wrong with something. :?
Does that mean that there is something wrong with this thread?

Posted: 16 Jan 2008 5:42 pm
by David L. Donald
Archie EVERYBODY got you something,
but you forgot it...

all for nothing! ;)

Posted: 16 Jan 2008 9:40 pm
by David Doggett
Scott, Doug Beaumier got off topic back on page 5 and introduced something. Everything else in this thread amounts to nothing compared to that...or even not compared to that...even compared to nothing. :?

Posted: 16 Jan 2008 11:00 pm
by Scott Shipley
No offense David, but I see nothing wrong with Doug's post.......
:roll:

Posted: 17 Jan 2008 5:45 am
by Ray Minich
Hmmmmmmm... Let's see here.... Nothing is wrong with something, and, at the same time, nothing is wrong with nothing.

The world must be in perfect order. Think I'll go point two mirrors at each other.

Posted: 17 Jan 2008 9:47 am
by Rick Collins
But, what thinking person can say that space is nothing?
It is that substance which surrounds mass.
If there were no mass there would be no space.
Space extends out omnidirectional with mass at the center.
Niels Bohr was an expert on this subject, as well as being a connoiseur of Danish beer.

Look at it this way:

Beer is a mixture composed of protons, neutrons, and electrons.
Space is composed of plasma.

On this subject, I believe Niels and Albert would both agree.

Posted: 17 Jan 2008 12:23 pm
by Richard Sevigny
Rick Collins wrote:Beer is a mixture composed of protons, neutrons, and electrons.
...and Beer is the most enjoyable mixture used in the accomplishment of nothing :lol:

Posted: 17 Jan 2008 5:52 pm
by David L. Donald
:D :D :D :D

Posted: 17 Jan 2008 5:59 pm
by Steve Norman
Is a hole the surrounding mass or the nothing in the middle? Is a hole full of nothing or nothing itself? does this defined area of nothing then become something? Do we have to have something so that nothing can exist only if by comparison?

Isnt it weird that a whole and a hole are so different yet
only separated by a w?

(twilight zone song runs throughout this post)

Posted: 17 Jan 2008 6:24 pm
by David L. Donald
So nothing could be described as:
More than excessive thinness.

Posted: 17 Jan 2008 9:36 pm
by Rick Collins
Space cannot be nothing. If it was nothing it could have no shape __ but it does. We know this because of gravity. Gravity is the shape of space surrounding matter. This is why spheres orbit each other. They follow the shape of space. If you were Dolly Parton you would better understand this. She leans forward when she walks.

A black hole is the ultimate distortion of the shape of space. Very dense matter distorts its space so much light cannot escape.

Posted: 17 Jan 2008 10:32 pm
by David L. Donald
So nothing is
not close to
any black holes. :)

Since it seems to be the antithis of a black hole
is nothing a white hole?

Is it all hole,
a whole hole,
or no hole at all?

Posted: 18 Jan 2008 5:37 am
by JERRY THURMOND
WOW This is really nothing

Jerry

Posted: 18 Jan 2008 6:18 am
by Ray Minich
Do fish have feelings? If not, then, nothing matters to them...