Page 124 of 172

Posted: 4 Oct 2013 12:55 pm
by Paul Graupp
Or could it be that the NOSE have (...has...) it ?? 8) :mrgreen:

Posted: 4 Oct 2013 2:51 pm
by b0b
Eye nose nothing.

Posted: 7 Oct 2013 11:43 am
by Scott Shipley
Sorry, thought there was something going on here.

Posted: 7 Oct 2013 12:36 pm
by Paul Graupp
It's just NOTHING, Scott ! 8) :\

Nothing

Posted: 16 Oct 2013 6:01 pm
by Greely Baggett
I've never agreed to anything, but this time I must agree!

Posted: 16 Oct 2013 10:33 pm
by Don Kona Woods
From the movie "NOTHING" comes the definition of nothing - It is a featureless and empty white void.

I learned something that I did not know before in that the void is white. But what kind of white is it?

Posted: 17 Oct 2013 12:15 am
by Roy Heap
It's NOTHING but white Don. :D

Posted: 17 Oct 2013 9:13 am
by Alan Brookes
Nothing isn't white. White is caused by the reflection of light. Since light is not nothing, neither can white be. The complete absence of light is black. For istance, if you turn off a computer monitor it goes black, not white. The white you see on modern monitors needs a constant voltage to maintain it. Those of us who used computers in the early days are familiar with the early monitors on which words were always green or yellow on a black background. In fact, when the white background was introduced I found it a lot too glaring. Nowadays we take it for granted. I'm typing on a white background now. But really, the only reason computer programs use white as a background for words is that we're used to seeing printed books and papers, and no-one writes on black paper. In fact it would be very difficult to write on black paper, but that would have nothing to do with the topic. :\

Posted: 17 Oct 2013 3:13 pm
by Paul Graupp
I don't know if this is correct or just another NOTHING...but if red were the lowest frequency in the color spectrum and orange a bit higher, their radius in the visual sighting of a rainbow would be the longest and the next to the longest and so on and so forth through the remaining colors.

:? :? :? :?

Posted: 17 Oct 2013 3:52 pm
by Alan Brookes
Paul Graupp wrote:I don't know if this is correct or just another NOTHING...but if red were the lowest frequency in the color spectrum and orange a bit higher, their radius in the visual sighting of a rainbow would be the longest and the next to the longest and so on and so forth through the remaining colors.
:? :? :? :?
You're right on three counts:-
[1] You don't know if it's correct. 8)
[2] It actually is correct. 8)
[3] It's just another "nothing". 8)

Well done, three out of three, :D and completely irrelevant to the discussion of "nothing", :cry: yet containing the word "nothing". :\ :?

It's a tautological fact that any subject that has nothing to do with "nothing", automatically has relevance to "nothing" in that it has nothing to do with the subject. :\ :\ :\ :\

Posted: 17 Oct 2013 4:17 pm
by Paul Graupp
Run that by me one more time TAUTOLOGICAL :whoa: :aside: :?:

Is that a word Tonto would use on the Lone Ranger ? >:-)

Posted: 17 Oct 2013 10:37 pm
by Don Kona Woods
Alan responds by saying
The complete absence of light is black.
Could this mean that the absence of light is NOTHING so therefore black is NOTHING?

Posted: 17 Oct 2013 11:24 pm
by Roy Heap
Blimey ,NOTHING makes sense here, I think I will just go and sit in the garden and do NOTHING.

Posted: 18 Oct 2013 3:43 am
by Scott Duckworth
I'm going back to bed, all this NOTHING has made me tired... and it's only 7:45AM...

Posted: 18 Oct 2013 8:55 am
by Alan Brookes
Monday was the anniversary of the Battle of Hastings, fought 14th October, 1066.

Posted: 18 Oct 2013 9:59 am
by Roy Heap
Alan,
That means NOTHING to me I wasn't there. :D

Posted: 18 Oct 2013 2:22 pm
by Alan Brookes
Exactly. It's completely off-topic, which means that it has nothing to do with the topic, which means that it's on-topic. :eek: :\ :\ :?

Posted: 19 Oct 2013 6:46 am
by Paul Graupp
Makes TAUTOLOGIC sense to me whatever that means... :whoa: :? :? :?

Posted: 19 Oct 2013 9:09 am
by b0b
Literally, and geologically.

Posted: 19 Oct 2013 9:31 am
by Scott Duckworth
This the thread you go to when you have NOTHING else to do...

Posted: 19 Oct 2013 10:11 am
by Alan Brookes
It's also the thread you go to when you do have other things to do but you're too lazy to do them.
http://bb.steelguitarforum.com/viewtopi ... &start=325
Those people should register for my Procrastination Workshop. :D

Posted: 19 Oct 2013 11:47 am
by Scott Duckworth
Alan, you're to blame... now we are at 125 pages of NOTHING!

I got

Posted: 19 Oct 2013 12:51 pm
by Ken Campbell
Nothin'

Posted: 19 Oct 2013 1:41 pm
by b0b
Me neither, er, too.

Posted: 19 Oct 2013 4:57 pm
by Alan Brookes
Scott Duckworth wrote:Alan, you're to blame... now we are at 125 pages of NOTHING!
I wasn't the originator of this thread. Thst was Sir Bob the Knight. Like you, I just participate. If there's anyone to blame for the 125 pages it's everyone who has ever participated in it. If Bobby Lee doesn't mind the space it takes up on his hard disk, it does at least provide several hours of reading entertainment for anyone wishing to go through the whole thing. :D 8)
Scott, maybe you should make an audio recording, reading it all out, and then send it to Librivox. :roll: ;-)