Page 12 of 172

Posted: 25 Nov 2007 7:32 pm
by Richard Sevigny
My wife often tells me I have nothing to say..

Posted: 25 Nov 2007 8:34 pm
by Larry Strawn
Richard, that's really hard to read with all that white lettering, but I got it,,,,,,,,and she's probably right! :lol:

Larry

Posted: 26 Nov 2007 6:12 pm
by Alan Brookes
Archie Nicol wrote:What will a football team from Birmingham win in the foreseeable future?
...
I don't know. My Dad used to be an avid Aston Villa supporter but I gave up going down Villa Park about 1955, and discussion of that "other" team, the Blues at St. Andrews (Birmingham City) was verboten in our household. as were the Baggies (West Bromwich Albion) :roll: :whoa: In 1957 I took up REAL football, Rugby Union, and lost all interest in so**er. ;-) ;-)

Posted: 27 Nov 2007 5:19 am
by Archie Nicol
AAARGH! You called it soccer. You blasphemer.
Never visit these shores again! ;-)
I like both rugby codes. No namby-pamby prima-donnas there.

Arch.

Posted: 27 Nov 2007 7:53 am
by Richard Sevigny
I like rugby. It's (yankee) football without the body armour. Makes the super bowl look like a sissie's game :P

Posted: 27 Nov 2007 3:42 pm
by Alan Brookes
Archie Nicol wrote:AAARGH! You called it soccer...
What do you suggest I call it ? Togger ? Certainly not Football. The only real football is rugby. When I was at Grammar School we would be caned if we played soccer. It was not considered a gentleman's game. :eek:

Posted: 27 Nov 2007 3:45 pm
by Alan Brookes
Richard Sevigny wrote:I like rugby. It's (yankee) football without the body armour. Makes the super bowl look like a sissie's game :P
American football started out as rugby, but the two games separated when they introduced the forward pass rule. From then on the two games drifted in different directions. It's like the split between rounders and baseball, and netball and basketball, they started out as the same game.

Posted: 27 Nov 2007 5:23 pm
by Archie Nicol
I suppose Association football is the old-fashioned term. We call it fitba' in Scotland.

I thought the old saying was;

Football* is a game for gentlemen, played by hooligans.
Rugby Union is a game for hooligans, played by gentlemen.
Whilst Rugby League is a game for hooligans, played by hooligans.

No matter what, it's all a load of balls that has us talking about something other than nothing. :D

Arch.

*Soccer to youze!

Posted: 27 Nov 2007 10:17 pm
by Duane Reese
Don't people in Sheffield call it soccer?

Posted: 28 Nov 2007 3:17 am
by Bob Knight
Guys,
You are doing Nothing but hijacking my thead!! :lol:

Posted: 28 Nov 2007 5:36 am
by Ray Minich
Nothing rhymes with nothing...

True of False?

Posted: 28 Nov 2007 11:37 am
by David Doggett
This thread seems to be dwindling to...guess what?

Posted: 28 Nov 2007 11:52 am
by b0b
<bump>









































































































































































































<bump>

Posted: 28 Nov 2007 1:26 pm
by Bob Knight

Posted: 28 Nov 2007 5:17 pm
by Alan Brookes
Bob Knight wrote:Guys,
You are doing Nothing but hijacking my thead!!
Okay, let's get back on topic.
:D


Ummm !






Hmmmm !








Errr !





There doesn't seem to be a topic. :\

Posted: 28 Nov 2007 5:21 pm
by Alan Brookes
I was always told that an empty sheet of paper is an opportunity, an opening, an invitation. A sheet of paper with NOTHING written on it is much more valuable that one that has been written on. Once it's written on you can't use it, but while it's blank it's ready to receive anything you may choose to write.



Of course, once you do write on it then it's no longer free to receive uncompromised information.





So don't write anything on a blank sheet of paper lest you compromise its possibilities....

Posted: 29 Nov 2007 9:02 am
by Duane Reese
Some see the cup half-full, some see it half-empty... I see this cup as completely empty!

I said it before and I'll say it again...

Ø

Posted: 29 Nov 2007 9:36 am
by Richard Sevigny
Hey, nothin' to it...

Posted: 29 Nov 2007 5:35 pm
by Alan Brookes
b0b wrote:<bump>









































































































































































































<bump>

Posted: 29 Nov 2007 6:07 pm
by Jeremy Threlfall
yess, he did , didn't he?!

Uh-oh

Posted: 29 Nov 2007 7:19 pm
by Steve Atwood
Does anyone know if your name shows up on someone's caller ID screen if you hang up after the first ring?

I just dialed 668-4464 (NOT-HING) to see what would happen and it rang!

I hung up right away but I'm a little worried.

Posted: 30 Nov 2007 8:29 am
by Alan Brookes
I don't know, but you'll probably get an irate 'phone call from a Chinaman called Not Hing. :D

Posted: 30 Nov 2007 9:27 am
by Richard Sevigny
I don't know, but you'll probably get an irate 'phone call from a Chinaman called Not Hing.
... and be accused of ringing a "Wong" number???

Posted: 1 Dec 2007 2:12 pm
by Steve Atwood
The funny thing is, when I dial my own number, I get Nothing.

(This will be my last post for a while. I don't want my total posts to go over 0.00% of the total.)

Posted: 1 Dec 2007 10:12 pm
by LJ Eiffert
I called home today to see if I was there & someone told me I just left.I guess that's nothing. Leo J.Eiffert,Jr.