Page 2 of 2

Posted: 23 Nov 2006 9:26 am
by Jay Fagerlie
Mike,
Why is it a stupid test?
J

Posted: 23 Nov 2006 10:22 am
by Mike Shefrin
Jay,
Actually I take that back. It's not stupid, but I sure wouldn't let the results of this test whether they were high or low
influence me in terms of where I think I am at musically. That's really what I should have said initially.
Mike Image

Posted: 23 Nov 2006 10:27 am
by Chris LeDrew
Some interesting melodies, actually.

Posted: 23 Nov 2006 11:40 am
by Ray Riley
75%

Posted: 23 Nov 2006 11:54 am
by Mark Vinbury
My score was 72 on the first try and 94 + on the second.
Must have been stage fright.

Posted: 23 Nov 2006 3:05 pm
by Bill Miller
83.3% first attempt. I may try it again but do you reckon they might come out with an all pedal steel version later on? I hate those techno sounds. Image

Posted: 23 Nov 2006 3:57 pm
by Les Anderson
Jeez, Am I the only one who flunked the bloody test? Image

Now what?

Posted: 23 Nov 2006 5:08 pm
by Michael Barone
86.1 relaxing after Thanksgiving Dinner. I don't think the recall of dissonant passages would be significant, especially with wierd synth patches of strange harmonic content, played at close intervals.

(IMHO) The range should be made wider, forcing one to account for practical intervals and octaves.

I thought about a test where you "name that chord". Now that (again, IMHO) would be a more practical test in which you could train and improve your ear. But then, that's how I think, being an educator.

------------------
Mike Barone
<small>2006 Carter S10 5&5, Sho-Bud Pro-1 5&5
Nashville 112, Assorted Guitars & Keyboards

"A teacher affects eternity; he can never tell where his influence stops". Henry Adams</small>

Posted: 23 Nov 2006 5:26 pm
by Ken Fox
http://www.good-ear.com/servlet/EarTrainer

This one is great! Found it about a year ago.


Posted: 23 Nov 2006 8:38 pm
by Mark White
Took it twice with the exact same result 83.3 %

Posted: 24 Nov 2006 11:27 am
by Nate LaPointe
77.8% for me. Not bad. I guess if you know what to look for it's a bit easier.

------------------
www.natelapointe.net


Posted: 24 Nov 2006 12:48 pm
by Glenn Suchan
What'dya know 'bout that? I got 88.9 % !!! Far better than I thought I'd do. Image

Keep on pickin'!
Glenn


Posted: 24 Nov 2006 1:56 pm
by Gary Schuldt
75% Normal. Lot of Fun!

Posted: 24 Nov 2006 5:46 pm
by Joey Ace
Let me join the majority here with 83.3%

Good speakers no distractions.

Fun Link, Bob!

Posted: 24 Nov 2006 7:17 pm
by graham rodger
i got 83.3% well pleased!!

Posted: 24 Nov 2006 7:54 pm
by Darryl Hattenhauer
Gary,
I'm also about 75% normal, and it is indeed a lot of fun.

------------------
"The less I was of who I was, the better I felt." -- Leonard Cohen

Posted: 24 Nov 2006 10:59 pm
by Greely Baggett
80.6. I'm amazed. Maybe I should switch instruments and go "Techno". Oh well... Image

------------------
Mullen D-10 royal
Nashville 1000
Tele plus, Martin HD-28
65 Fender Twin
Home Digital 16 Track Recording Studio

"Pick one for Jesus"


Posted: 27 Nov 2006 8:48 am
by Frederic Mabrut
88.6 just before dinner.

Posted: 27 Nov 2006 2:23 pm
by Bobby Lee
I got 91.7% (3 wrong answers). It was fun. I wondered if they were doing any temperament differences or things like that to trip people up.

One of the ones I missed was #33. I listened to it again, and they still sound different to me. It says that only 23% of people get this correct. Either the test is wrong, or there's something about that phrase that makes it sound different each time you listen to it, even though it's the same.

------------------
<font size="1"><img align=right src="http://b0b.com/b0b2005.gif" width="78 height="78">Bobby Lee (a.k.a. b0b) - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Williams D-12 E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (F Diatonic)
Sierra Laptop S-8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (E13, C6 or A6) My Blog </font>
<div style="display:none">

Posted: 27 Nov 2006 6:57 pm
by Bill Miller
In the FAQ area a violinist with the Detroit Symphony reports scoring 100% twice in a row. He must be incredibly sharp or extremely lucky. I got 91.7% on my second try but I'm thinking it's pretty much pointless to keep repeating it. My first result was quite decent and it represents what the test was intended to measure. It would be fun to do it again with all different sound samples. A test that puts a bit more emphasis on subtle differences in pitch would be interesting too.

Posted: 27 Nov 2006 9:25 pm
by James Cann
Since most of us are products of the 40's and 50's, who remembers the Seashore Musical Aptitude Test, given in elementary schools? I remember doing very well on stuff like this (though no one ever told me percentiles or scores), so it was with some embarrassment that I clocked in at only 80.3 on this one.

Posted: 30 Nov 2006 7:51 pm
by Gordon Borland
I took the test but could not find a score.
All I see is;
"You can reliably defferentiate two tones
1.2 Hz apart". But I did not see anything about a percentage anywhere or is this another test to see how dumb I am????


------------------
Gordon Borland
MSA D10,FENDER STEEL KING,

Posted: 1 Dec 2006 8:35 am
by Dave Little
Apearantly, I can tell tone differences of 1.35 Hz. This makes me world class! Whoopee!
Dave Little

Posted: 1 Dec 2006 3:11 pm
by Bill Miller
I wonder did they just put this second test up? I didn't notice this one before. It says I can reliably hear pitch differences 0.825 Hz apart. I used headphones.

Posted: 1 Dec 2006 9:59 pm
by Brian McGaughey
There's hope for me! 100% on the phrase id's and able to detect .9 Hz difference in pitch...Yipee! And this after a couple glasses of wine (maybe that helped!). Now I just need to learn to play the PSG.

Brian<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Brian McGaughey on 01 December 2006 at 10:05 PM.]</p></FONT>