Posted: 5 Feb 2021 1:49 pm
I appreciate the feedback, it and the lessons have been helpful in this matter. After the first week of this, well I feel I've discovered more of my shortfalls than I have identified my strong areas. This isn't a negative for me, I'm always looking for a better way to do things. Among the theory and chord development areas I need to study on, I have some techniques that can use work that I wouldn't have really noticed if I hadn't stopped staring into the TAB sheets.
I will shorten the quotes in the thread to make this a little easier to read.
Getting out of the mindset of trying to sound like a specific artist is something I've been working on for years. I was never set out to be another Earl Scruggs, Brent Mason, or Paul Franklin. I have been working on listening to genres that aren't my normal country/bluegrass favorites- for the purpose of musical study - and its an interesting exercise. I appreciate the point of view there.
I will shorten the quotes in the thread to make this a little easier to read.
I did do a couple searches and didn't find anything readily available for "Missing Link," but I will keep an eye open. The first time I sat and wrote out the intervalic relationships for my COPENDENT in the E9th and B6th modes, is the first time I really started to realize what I was playing. I need to study that out quite a bit further, but it solidifies my confidence in the COPEDENT and ability to view it as one larger tuning.J D Sauser wrote:. . .
After I wrote my previous message and mentioned Maurice's "Missing Link" (and I believe he did two more courses expanding on it)... and was dismayed to find that NO-one seemed to have taken up his material to continue to be available.
The Missing Link had an intervalic chart system with overlays... it was brilliant.
It "cracked the nut" for me, but sadly, most even back then, were more interested in getting their next "fix" of tabbed out "licks". But those who did The Missing Link all acclaimed it and I think only few would have gone back to TAB after it.
A key thing is also to release oneself from the urge of not only learn from the Greats but to want to SOUND like them. We move ourselves in a musical world of individualists. We are not meant to be orchestra violinists playing in "unison" along with 20 others... so the best way to "imitate" our heroes is to become individualists like the too.
Don't just listen to steel guitars, listen to Sax players, Piano players, Guitarist (just NEVER to Banjo Players, they are "impure" and never Kosher und thus not worthy! Ha! )
... J-D.
Getting out of the mindset of trying to sound like a specific artist is something I've been working on for years. I was never set out to be another Earl Scruggs, Brent Mason, or Paul Franklin. I have been working on listening to genres that aren't my normal country/bluegrass favorites- for the purpose of musical study - and its an interesting exercise. I appreciate the point of view there.
James Sission wrote:. . .
I think what you are describing is likely a parallel to Paul Franklin's courses on intervals and the ones he does on permutations. Those are really designed to educate the student on how to get around the fret board and create his own musical ideologies and styles.
K.
I'm going back through the intervals and permutations lessons with the PFM. Its starting to click, but its going to take some dedicated study for me to fully shift the way I play.J D Sauser wrote:. . .
Yes. Evidently VIDEO was an "option" only back then. Yet, Maurice's Courses worked on the CONCEPT in depth and then provided a few tunes to apply it on and then go on "fly alone". I think that most which feel attracted by PF's course, would benefit more and easier from it after having acquired Maurice's courses on the subject.
... J-D.