Page 2 of 3
Posted: 4 Oct 2002 2:24 pm
by Jeff Lampert
<SMALL>Is it just for a whole step drop to a unison lick? What are some of the other uses? Ed</SMALL>
Ed, why not start a separate topic on this? Also, if you post a new topic in the Tab section of the Forum, I'll bet some players will tab out a few licks for you on lowering the G# to F#. Regards .. Jeff
Posted: 4 Oct 2002 3:09 pm
by Paul Graupp
b0b: Thanks for reminding me but sometime back I mentioned that I always wanted the same number of plains and wounds. I remember feeling like the Lone Ranger when I posted it and then someone came along and said BE did that too. That was a really good change of feelings for me and I'd almost forgot it.
Thanks for the Memory ! Paul
Posted: 4 Oct 2002 7:23 pm
by Rex Thomas
What Kenny Krupnick said made sense to me. I just never thought of it that way. My Sho-Buds & MSA's had wound 6ths, the Emmons had plain.
Here builders, whaddya think: Wouldn't scale length better make that determination? (NO BOBBE, I'm guessing. Put yer gun away.) It seemed to me that the Buds & the MSA's were a bit shorter than the Emmons, it definitely felt more taunt, & it took me awhile to get used to that extra 1/4" (?). But the plain 6th was fine. Yeah, there were extra overtones but I got used to it. My Derb has a plain 6th & it's fine, although I raise the 7th instead of dropping the 6th.
Can't imagine a plain 6th on the older Buds, but I'm sure it works for someone out there.
I do hope the string manufacturers won't forsake us concerning oddball sizes, as I see a LOT of variations on this theme, both plain & wound.
Posted: 5 Oct 2002 6:15 am
by Brian Herder
A few years back, Ricky Davis suggested that I use a .024w on my old Sho Bud (and a .012 3rd). It made a huge difference in sound and set up/performance, and I'll never go back (not with this guitar, anyway).
I like what Bobby Lee said about the heavy plain 6th string seeming more like a paper clip than an instrument string.
Posted: 5 Oct 2002 7:20 am
by Lee Baucum
On my old Sho-Bud and MSA guitars, I always used a wound .024. In the early 80's I switched to an Emmons (S-12) push/pull and continued to do so. Later, I converted the guitar to a Universal (E9/B6). When I did that, it called for raising the 6th string a whole tone. I just couldn't get the guitar to pull that string far enough to get a whole tone raise, using a wound .024. That's when I changed to an .022P and have used that size ever since. Now that I'm playing a Mullen, I guess it's time to try the wound string again.
------------------
Lee, from South Texas
Posted: 5 Oct 2002 7:23 am
by Lee Baucum
Off Topic Comment: Whip Lashaway is a way cool name.
------------------
Lee, from South Texas
Posted: 5 Oct 2002 7:51 am
by David Wright
I to play the Bb6, and agree with Maurice, I have tryed the plain .22 and found I had a visual problem knowing were I was sometimes.....
------------------
[url=http://david_wright1.tripod.com/]My Web Page[/url]
Sierra Guitars
Sierra S-12 9&7
Peavey-2000-PX-300
Posted: 5 Oct 2002 7:58 am
by Bobby Lee
On the Bb6th, that string is tuned lower (to G instead of G#). All the more reason to use a wound string.
Posted: 6 Oct 2002 5:39 am
by Chuck McGill
Ok O'Bobbe where art thou on this subject.
(not Everett McGill but close)
Posted: 6 Oct 2002 3:22 pm
by Wayne Cox
Well,since no one else has brought this up; I once owned a pedal steel with a 25" scale. On this particular steel I tuned to a D9th (same intervals as E9th) and found that I could use an .022p for a sixth string. I felt that it shoud have been too loose,but it wasn't,even though it was tuned to F#. Also,it didn't go dead on the 12th frett. All of this seems to contradict my experience other steels. Maybe the string length made the difference,or maybe not,but please don't get into a 25" vs 24 1/4" battle over this.
W.C.
Posted: 6 Oct 2002 9:22 pm
by Al Burk
My first steel was a MSA and they recomended a 24w. I've notice that most sets of psg strings include a plain 20 or 22 for the 6th string. Occasionally, I would try the plain and was never satified with the tuning or tone and would switch back to the wound.
I got a new Carter last year and had Bud set up the PF forth pedal that lowers the 6th a whole tone. Bud said I would have to use a plain to use that pedal. I was never happy with the tone or tuning and switched back to 24w on the 6th. I've decided not to use the PF pedal and use the change somewhere else.
Al Burk
Posted: 7 Oct 2002 4:47 am
by Dave Ristrim
Don't forget that with all "wound" strings, the size of the core will effect the tension. Not all brand of wound strings have the same core size. Use a micrometer when changing brands of string.
Dave
Posted: 7 Oct 2002 6:34 am
by Erv Niehaus
FWIW, It's been reported that you have a better chance of making a wound string work if you have a keyless guitar. There is less string to fool with behind the roller nut.
Erv
Posted: 7 Oct 2002 8:02 am
by Bobbe Seymour
Pretty amazing, but this is what I wanted to see. Did you know that better than 99% of E9th tunings are played with a plain sixth string? This sort of proves that the dreaded "cabinet drop" either isn't as important or doesn't exist on many guitars.
How important is "caninet drop" to you? Actually, it isn't very to me, what little Iv'e seen , seems to help sweeten the tuning more than hurt. However, I'm still suspicious of seeing new guitars come with wound third strings , from the factory since 99% of the players don't use a wound string.
Posted: 7 Oct 2002 10:09 am
by richard burton
Al Burk: I have no trouble lowering a 24W a full tone on my Carter, perhaps I ought to e-mail Bud with the simple mod I designed to achieve this drop.
Posted: 7 Oct 2002 11:30 am
by Whip Lashaway
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:</font><HR><SMALL>
Off Topic Comment: Whip Lashaway is a way cool name.
</SMALL><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Thanks Lee. I like it too! Actually my name is Mike, but, everybody calls me Whip.
Later
Whip!!!
------------------
Whip Lashaway
Sierra E9/B6 12 string
Sierra E9/B6 14 string
<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Whip Lashaway on 07 October 2002 at 01:16 PM.]</p></FONT><FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Whip Lashaway on 07 October 2002 at 01:22 PM.]</p></FONT>
Posted: 7 Oct 2002 3:21 pm
by Danny Bates
Information for thought;
On cheaper short scale pianos, there are more wound strings.
On expensive long scale pianos, there are less wound strings. In other words, the plain strings go further into the bass registers.
Posted: 7 Oct 2002 4:44 pm
by Paul Graupp
Danny: Could you give us a feel for the guages used on the plain piano strings ?? That just hit my curiosity button. Thanks !!
Regards, Paul
Posted: 7 Oct 2002 7:15 pm
by Bob Simmons
Ah men,Bobbe, spend less time worrying about cabinet drop and more time playing. The biggest thing I,ve noticed is that a lot of pickers can,t hear the flatted 3rd &5th tones. After that all you need is an E or something.
By the way, are you ready for a biennial flight review yet? Plan to fly up there soon.
Bob Simmons
Posted: 7 Oct 2002 7:23 pm
by Bob Simmons
Ah men,bobbe. To me a wound 6th doesn't have the ring. Spend more time picking and not worry about cabinet drop. I've also noticed a lot of pickers can't hear the flatted 3rd & 5th,etc when I take the tuners away from them. I just give them an E and make them show me an in-tune chord.
By the way, are you ready for a biennial flight review yet? Need to get up there soon.
Bob Simmons
Posted: 7 Oct 2002 7:25 pm
by Bob Simmons
opps, forgot there was a page 2
Posted: 7 Oct 2002 7:58 pm
by Danny Bates
Paul, for piano strings, the usual is .029 -.049 for the plain and .051 -.194 wound. The plain strings are sold (on spools)for a little over $11 a pound and the wound bass strings are about $5 wholesale. These are imported strings from Germany. They supposedly don't break as easy as American strings.
Posted: 7 Oct 2002 10:00 pm
by Al Burk
Richard Burton,
I would be very interested in the mod you did to your carter that lowers the wound 6th. You may email me at:
aburk@houston.rr.com
Also, let me know what Bud says about your mod.
Thanks,
Al
Posted: 8 Oct 2002 7:23 am
by Bobby Lee
Bobbe, your 99% figure doesn't match my string sales. I think it's more like 85%. And from what I'm reading here, the reason has more to do with
tone than cabinet drop. I lot of us just like the way the wound string sounds.
------------------
<small><img align=right src="
http://b0b.com/b0b.gif" width="64" height="64">
Bobby Lee - email:
quasar@b0b.com -
gigs -
CDs
Sierra Session 12 (
E9), Williams 400X (
Emaj9, D6), Sierra Olympic 12 (
F Diatonic), Sierra Laptop 8 (D13), Fender Stringmaster (
E13, A6), Roland Handsonic
Posted: 8 Oct 2002 8:53 am
by Larry Bell
I have two main guitars. One is a p/p and, since I need to raise and lower a full tone, I use a plain 022 on the sixth. On the Fessy, a wound 6th works fine in the last slot on the bellcrank for the full tone lower. I also lower it 1/2 tone and raise both a 1/2 and whole tone with slightly longer throw than a plain (duuuh) but not enough to be distracting or clumsy -- particularly where it counts -- on the B pedal.
I played the Fessy for a solid month after I went to the wound string. Sounded great, cab drop decreased substantially, tuned easier with few adjustments as the night went on.
I played the Emmons this weekend. It sounded great -- as usual -- but I really noticed how often I had to tweak the 6th string as it warmed from hand friction. It also is flaky using a strobe or other electronic tuner. The wound string has a strong fundamental signal and the plain is a quivering mass of overtones. Wound wins hands down for me.
------------------
<small>
Larry Bell - email:
larry@larrybell.org -
gigs -
Home Page
2000 Fessenden S-12 8x8, 1969 Emmons S-12 6x6, 1971 Dobro