Posted: 29 Sep 2011 9:06 am
But the thing is, James, that there is a persistent theme found among the Forum community that disparages all Sho-Buds from the mid-70's on as essentially low-quality crap, on the basis of their containing pot metal. No one disputes that lever brackets that can snap off are poor quality, nor as far as I know does anyone dispute that they are pot metal. That, of course, leads to a dim view of pot metal as cheap, cheesy material in those who learn about that.
In that context, your earlier post in this thread says:
(NOTE: I was writing this while James was posting the previous post.)
In that context, your earlier post in this thread says:
Then in response to my question about changer housings, keyheads, end plates and pedals, you say:Hexagon era 'buds were full of potmetal. The hex shafts themselves are steel, and the mounting brackets to mount the hex shafts to the wooden body are aluminum. The pullers and knee brackets,and straight knee levers and finger radius, keyheads, changer housing, and endplates are pot metal. The pedal bar is aluminum channel, the narrow pedals are pot metal.
Which seems to suggest that those parts are actually cast aluminum, albeit you suggest of lesser quality. The articles on pot metal mention aluminum as at most an incidental component of pot metal. And you sayThere are different grades of casting quality, by whatever someone wants to mix up. All aluminum castings are not created equal--there are different grades of aluminum, depending upon purity.
Given the opinion widely and justifiably held that "pot metal is crap," it would be unfortunate to disseminate the idea that there is more pot metal in later Buds than is in fact the case. That's why I've been asking for clarification of what you're saying.there's a huge difference between cast pot metal and cast aluminum.
(NOTE: I was writing this while James was posting the previous post.)