Page 2 of 3

Posted: 21 Feb 2008 4:01 pm
by Archie Nicol
"....less is more!!!!"
Tell that to Bill Hankey. :lol:

Arch.

Posted: 21 Feb 2008 4:05 pm
by Bo Legg
It seems that Michael is into jazz. He mixes and substitutes his cords acchordingly. Arch don't start your hankey pankey :lol:

Posted: 21 Feb 2008 6:35 pm
by chris ivey
how much is a million bucks divided by three chords??

Posted: 21 Feb 2008 8:05 pm
by Alan Brookes
Listen to Elvis's "When It Rains It Really Pours." It only has one chord through the whole number. :eek:

Posted: 21 Feb 2008 9:06 pm
by Joe Drivdahl
I remember a Clapton song off his "Backless" album which I believe followed directly behind the "Slow Hand" album. Anyway the song was a blues kind of thing. It was all in one chord with a woman screaming unintelligible vocals. I think it might be a classic now. Too bad I can't remember the title.

I was pretty underwhelmed by it. I think you gotta have at least two chords or whats the point?

Posted: 21 Feb 2008 11:36 pm
by Billy Wilson
I once brought Vance Terry to a Zydeco gig. The kid genius squeeze box player Andre Thierry was pumping out his music over the usual one chord funky grooves. Vance listened for a while and then said:
Damn!! One chord!! Let me play some of that. I could play the $h1t out of that. I wouldn't have to think about the changes!! Simplicity rules.

Posted: 25 Feb 2008 10:16 am
by Mark Treepaz
Jim Cohen wrote:Well, I just hope they're not simultaneously saying how much they like Blues! :whoa:
Now, THERE ya' go! Excellent point! :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Posted: 25 Feb 2008 12:54 pm
by Mike Headrick
I've recorded groups who did songs with up to five modulations, and maybe 8 or 9 chords in each key. That's when I'd rather be out fishing. I think it's absurd and very unmusical to move around that much.What would have been the feel of the song goes right out the window.

Posted: 25 Feb 2008 1:04 pm
by Larry Strawn
Mikey,
I got ya beat on those cords!

I got 2 on my volume pedal loop, 2 on my effects loop, and 1 straight to my steel, that's ,,,ummm 5 I think, and they're black! :D

ps. thanks for the help on the Night Life intro thing. :D

Larry

Posted: 25 Feb 2008 1:59 pm
by Theresa Galbraith
I don't know, but if they listen to today's country it's more than 3 Cords.

Posted: 25 Feb 2008 2:13 pm
by John Roche
If the song only needs three chords why play more.
You can only play whats needed, Dance the night away= 3 chords.
54 more with two chords
http://www.drbanjo.com/pdf/jam-favorites_54_2chord.pdf

Posted: 25 Feb 2008 2:17 pm
by John Roche

Posted: 25 Feb 2008 2:21 pm
by Theresa Galbraith
I'm just saying play what is needed and more if you feel it needs more. :)

Posted: 25 Feb 2008 3:39 pm
by Henry Nagle
To me, it's not about the chords. It's about the melody and phrasing. Three chords can be plenty interesting, even complex, in the hands of an expert.

Posted: 25 Feb 2008 3:55 pm
by Edward Meisse
All modern American popular music began with the blues. You can really hear it in country up into the 1950's. There's really nothing wrong with 3 chord songs.
And by the way, in my composition classes of long ago, I was taught that there are, in fact, only 3 chords in existance, the tonic, dominant and subdominant. Every single chord, in every single musical composition, is serving one of those 3 functions. There is nothing else.

Posted: 25 Feb 2008 4:02 pm
by Earnest Bovine
Edward Meisse wrote:, in my composition classes of long ago, I was taught that there are, in fact, only 3 chords in existance, the tonic, dominant and subdominant. Every single chord, in every single musical composition, is serving one of those 3 functions. There is nothing else.
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamed of in your teacher's philosophy.

Posted: 25 Feb 2008 5:15 pm
by Edward Meisse
Holy cow!! Are you in earnest? :lol:
No, really. Is there, in fact, another function of which I am unaware?

Posted: 25 Feb 2008 9:21 pm
by Leslie Ehrlich
For the same reason that some people think rock music has only three chords.

Posted: 26 Feb 2008 5:30 am
by Roger Rettig
I once heard a band playing 'By The Time I get To Phoenix' with only three chords.

Posted: 26 Feb 2008 5:56 am
by Michael Douchette
I just love it when a band plays three chords...

... all at the same time... :whoa: :lol:

Posted: 26 Feb 2008 9:19 am
by Barry Blackwood
"To me, it's not about the chords. It's about the melody and phrasing."

e.g., One Note Samba? :eek:

Posted: 26 Feb 2008 11:31 am
by Gordy Hall
A local club owner was quoted as saying the difference between jazz musicians and blues musicians was that the blues musicians use 3 chords for 100 people, and jazz musicians use 100 chords for 3 people.

;)

Posted: 26 Feb 2008 11:55 am
by Andy Greatrix
HOw long ago was it when Hank Williams Senior played Lovesick Blues on the Oprey?
There are a lot more than three chords in that song.
There is so much variety in Country music.
For instance, there is country blues, country swing, country rock, Bakersfield country, Texas Dancehall country, etc.
I think the bottom line is, either you like country music or you don't.

Posted: 26 Feb 2008 12:08 pm
by scott murray
that Vance Terry quote is great. you too Gordy!

I think you have to admit that the majority of country music is only 3 chords (the new stuff don't count)
I think rock'n'roll is generally thought of as three-chord music too, but country is three chords and the truth!

Of course you can take a 3-chord tune and rearrange it and add a bunch more chords. One of my favorite examples is Jeff Newman and Mike Auldridge's version of "I'm So Lonesome I Could Cry" from the Slidin' Smoke album.

on the flip side, you can take a song with more chords and trim it down to three. Check out the country version of "Nowhere Man" by Red Knuckles and the Trailblazers (aka Hot Rize). it's great. (I don't think "By the Time I Get To Phoenix" would work quite as well!)

Posted: 26 Feb 2008 12:40 pm
by Roger Rettig
Believe me, Scott - it didn't!!!!!

:whoa: :x :aside:

RR