Page 100 of 172
Posted: 29 Jul 2011 6:23 pm
by b0b
<center>
</center>
Posted: 31 Jul 2011 1:24 pm
by Paul Graupp
I was going to chisel this in stone but lost my hammer...
Show Us 6-6-07 to 19-6-11
38 pages 930 replies
200,741 views
ZB 28-10-02 to 25-7-11
96 pages 2,392 replies
123,770 views
NOTHING 21-7-07 to 05-8-11
100 pages 2,481 replies
100,000 views
My son the mechanic said MATTCO Tools has a hammer with a part number BFH-xxx ! Without that I am...you guessed it once again
GNIHTON !!
Posted: 31 Jul 2011 1:27 pm
by Bob Knight
Posted: 31 Jul 2011 1:40 pm
by James Morehead
This thread is living proof Bob K. can take nothing, make something out of it, and still end up with nothing.
Bob, I see you still have not changed your opinion.
Posted: 31 Jul 2011 4:58 pm
by Bent Romnes
That's nothing to worry about.
Posted: 5 Aug 2011 2:07 pm
by Paul Graupp
Posted: 5 Aug 2011 5:18 pm
by Paul Graupp
At 9:19 it was 99,999/at 9:20 it was 100,005...Did I miss something or was it just another NOTHING ??
Posted: 5 Aug 2011 7:13 pm
by b0b
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle
Measuring one particle, Einstein realized, would alter the probability distribution of the other, yet here the other particle could not possibly be disturbed. This example led Bohr to revise his understanding of the principle, concluding that the uncertainty was not caused by a direct interaction.
Posted: 6 Aug 2011 12:16 am
by James Morehead
100 pages of nothing, with 100,000+ views--Starting to resemble politics. We need to clean it up fellas, forum rules say you can't discuss politics, now!!
Posted: 7 Aug 2011 5:27 pm
by Duane Reese
Posted: 14 Aug 2011 4:09 am
by Paul Graupp
Posted: 14 Aug 2011 5:33 am
by Roger Crawford
Paul, that's because evryone can identify with nothing. There is more nothing available than anything else.
Posted: 14 Aug 2011 8:23 am
by Alan Brookes
Paul Graupp wrote:...doesn't anyone have something to say here ??
In the midst of that hundred pages, (most of which seems to duplicate the meaning of the word
nothing, or to count how many posts have occured,) there
has been a complete, intelligent discussion of the concept of nothing, both mathematically and logically, together with the misconceptions created by the fact that the word as a subject has a different meaning to when used as the negative of an object. In that regard, members of the Forum have proven to have an intelligent grasp of the fundimental points. However, there's a lot of padding to read through to get to the salient points, and those who have made those salient points will hardly take the time to repeat them.
Everything worth saying on the subject seems to have already been told. From now on the thread is just meaningless amusement.
Posted: 14 Aug 2011 8:37 am
by Roger Crawford
Meaningless amusement...sounds like my steel playing
Posted: 14 Aug 2011 8:55 am
by Paul Graupp
Posted: 14 Aug 2011 10:11 am
by b0b
A lock is nothing to be taken lightly.
Posted: 14 Aug 2011 10:26 am
by Charlie McDonald
b0b wrote:This example led Bohr to revise his understanding of the principle, concluding that the uncertainty was not caused by a direct interaction.
I see nothing has changed.
Just checking.
Posted: 14 Aug 2011 11:37 am
by Paul Hoaglin
Does this mean that every time one of us views this topic, our observation of the topic disturbs not only this one, but other nonlocal topics as well? A sort of forum quantum entanglement? Not only has nothing changed, then, but so has everything else that has interacted with it, as a result of just checking!
Say it ain't so, b0b! No lock for Nothing!
Posted: 14 Aug 2011 12:45 pm
by b0b
Is nothing locked?
Posted: 14 Aug 2011 3:51 pm
by Alan Brookes
Wow, an alternative universe.
Posted: 14 Aug 2011 7:32 pm
by b0b
Posted: 14 Aug 2011 8:29 pm
by Alan Brookes
...except a fault in reality.
Not Much of Nothing...
Posted: 4 Sep 2011 3:33 pm
by Paul Graupp
Nothing 21-7-07 to 04-9-11
101 pages 2503 replies 101,688 views
ZB 28-10-02 to 22-8-11
97 pages 2408 replies 127,968 views
Show Off 06-6-07 to 04-9-11
38 pages 944 replies 205,920 views
Posted: 5 Sep 2011 3:30 pm
by Alan Brookes
If you're going to do a fair count you should deduct all the posts where all you're doing is counting posts. The counting of posts is off-topic. I don't see any post counting in the ZB or Show Us Your Steel topics.