Page 74 of 172
Posted: 1 Feb 2010 8:20 am
by Alan Brookes
What about...
DEITY
REINTRODUCED
DEINTENSIFIED
EIRE
EITHER
Posted: 1 Feb 2010 10:38 am
by Rick Collins
Alan Brookes wrote:What about...
DEITY
REINTRODUCED
DEINTENSIFIED
EIRE
EITHER
Joe, Alan, this really stimulates my creative instinct.
My latest poetic rendering:
LOTS OF NOTHING
by Richard Matthews Collins
I before
e except after
c
or when sounded like
a as in neighbor and weigh.
But, when
e before
i sounds like
e
Don't question it __ just let it be.
My neighbors' name is Greenleaf.
Do I call them the Greenleafs or the Greenleaves?
Posted: 4 Feb 2010 10:16 pm
by Joe Harwell
Alan Brookes wrote:What about...
DEITY
REINTRODUCED
DEINTENSIFIED
EIRE
EITHER
OK, Alan, I'll play.
Deity-direct transliteration of the Latin
Reintroduced-prefix, not part of original word
Deintesified-once again, a prefix,
where as the suffix fulfills the rule
Eire-proper noun and transliteration
Either-British pronunciation prevails?
Posted: 25 Feb 2010 7:55 pm
by Alan Brookes
Rick Collins wrote:"I before E except after C . . . Weird?"
I before
e except after
c, or when sounded like
a as in
neighbor and
weigh __ still
weird.
Joe, I tried to make some sense of this, but came up with
nothing.
"Nothing" has neither an "i", nor an "e", nor a "c".
...and I have NOWT more to say on that subject.
Posted: 26 Feb 2010 3:19 am
by Paul Graupp
I'm with you Alan !! I just can't say enough on this subject so I'll say NOTHING !!
Regrets, Paul
Posted: 12 Mar 2010 7:09 pm
by Alan Brookes
It seems a lot of people have been saying NOTHING lately.
Posted: 13 Mar 2010 5:03 pm
by Paul Graupp
Posted: 14 Mar 2010 12:53 pm
by Ray Minich
Nothing is what's at the end of an irrational number.
Posted: 14 Mar 2010 1:46 pm
by b0b
Nothing is happening here. Move along.
Posted: 14 Mar 2010 1:50 pm
by John P. Phillips
Moving along but nothing is happening !
Posted: 14 Mar 2010 1:59 pm
by Paul Graupp
Run, Forrest !! Run !!
Posted: 14 Mar 2010 5:20 pm
by Alan Brookes
Where I come from we say "nunk".
Posted: 14 Mar 2010 5:28 pm
by Rick Collins
Alan Brookes wrote:Where I come from we say "nunk".
Where I come from a nunk is a nun who is also a monk.
Posted: 16 Mar 2010 5:12 pm
by Roger Crawford
I'm glad something brought nothing back. If nothing leaves, do you still have everything?
Posted: 16 Mar 2010 7:11 pm
by Rick Abbott
Mr. Qualls,
I suddenly feel like an
HELP!!!!
Posted: 16 Mar 2010 8:30 pm
by Rick Collins
This thread is turning to
NOTHING; but isn't that what we want?
It's becoming just part of the Procrastination Workshop.
Pardon that expression __
w-o-r-k shop!
Posted: 17 Mar 2010 12:15 pm
by Jim Lindsey (Louisiana)
Great Ceasar's ghost ... 74 pages of nothing. This is the biggest nothing I've ever seen.
Posted: 17 Mar 2010 4:38 pm
by Alan Brookes
Roger Crawford wrote:I'm glad something brought nothing back. If nothing leaves, do you still have everything?
...as long as you started with everything; if you started with nothing you still have nothing, even though it's left.
Posted: 17 Mar 2010 4:55 pm
by Jim Lindsey (Louisiana)
Jim Lindsey wrote:Great Ceasar's ghost ... 74 pages of nothing. This is the biggest nothing I've ever seen.
On second thought, I take back what I said earlier. This is the second largest nothing I've ever seen ... the largest was my ex-wife.
Posted: 26 Mar 2010 7:10 pm
by Paul Graupp
Posted: 26 Mar 2010 9:22 pm
by b0b
Compared to that, this is nothing!
Posted: 27 Mar 2010 4:47 am
by Paul Graupp
75
75
75
75
75
Do I hear a 76 ??
Going Once...
Going Twice.....
Posted: 27 Mar 2010 8:55 am
by Alan Brookes
77. Above that I have nothing left.
Posted: 27 Mar 2010 9:12 am
by Alan Brookes
NOTHING. No Thing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thing_(assembly)
As any historian will tell you, a
Thing was the old Saxon word for a
Parliament.
The Isle of Man, in the Irish Sea, is still governed by a
Thing.
England, before the invasion by the Duke of Normandy in 1066, was governed by a
Thing.
So,
Nothing would be
"No Government".
You will have noticed that people in the North of England tend to say
"Nothink" instead of
"Nothing". This is because North of Watling Street was the Danelaw. There was much Danish settlement, and Anglo-Saxons were in the minority. (In fact, under King Knut, England was a Danish colony.) The Danes always pronounced words ending in
-ing as
-ink. Note how the Ice
Ring became the Ice
Rink. So, when you hear people say
"nothink" or
"noffink", don't dismiss them as illiterate: it's a legitimate regional variation.
But it goes even deeper than that. Anglo-Saxons rarely used the word
"thing" unless it meant government. They preferred to use the word
"what". Instead of saying
"there is something over there" they would say
"there is somewhat over there." Over the years,
"somewhat" has been abbreviated to
"summut", so many English people would say,
"there's summut over there". Again, it's not illiteracy, it's perfectly grammatical. Continuing on, instead of saying
"there is nothing over there" they would say
"there is nowhat over there." Over the years, "nowhat" has been abbreviated to "nowt", so many English people say
"there's nowt over there."
It gives a new perspective to
NOTHING, doesn't it ?
Posted: 27 Mar 2010 9:25 am
by Jim Lindsey (Louisiana)