Page 71 of 172

Posted: 11 Nov 2009 12:49 pm
by Alan Brookes
I went shopping at lunchtime and bought nothing.

I guess I am now the proud owner of nothing. I think I'll take out a copyright on it and people will pay me royalties on its use.

NOTHING©

Posted: 12 Nov 2009 8:04 am
by Rick Collins
Alan Brookes wrote:I went shopping at lunchtime and bought nothing.

I guess I am now the proud owner of nothing. I think I'll take out a copyright on it and people will pay me royalties on its use.

NOTHING©
Good idea.
I'm applying for a patent on the wheel myself, since nobody has.
Could I sue and collect retro-royalties?
:idea:
But, if I sue I might get nothing.

I'm really, really beginning to hate that word __ nothing.

Posted: 12 Nov 2009 4:47 pm
by Alan Brookes
Rick Collins wrote:...I'm really, really beginning to hate that word __ nothing.
There's nothing to hate. :D

Posted: 22 Nov 2009 5:06 pm
by Archie Nicol
We beat the Aussies at rugby yesterday. NOTHING short of pure luck and determination...Oh, and a missed conversion. Phew!

Arch.

Posted: 23 Nov 2009 8:14 am
by Rick Collins
Great Archie!

But, could expand and expound on that term, "pure luck"?
Is that a lot better than "contaminated luck"?
Seemingly, "contaminated luck" would contain better odds.

You are correct to be happy about the outcome.
The final score could have been nothing to nothing.

Posted: 23 Nov 2009 2:26 pm
by Archie Nicol
`But, could (you) expand and expound on that term, "pure luck"?`

Maybe, sometime in the future when that other thread allows me.

Arch.

Posted: 27 Nov 2009 2:10 pm
by Ray Minich
It is possible to have less than nothing...

When my bank balance is zero, there is "nothing in the bank".

When the account is overdrawn, is the balance then "less than nothing"?

Posted: 27 Nov 2009 7:25 pm
by Alan Brookes
Ray Minich wrote:...When the account is overdrawn, is the balance then "less than nothing"?
No, you can't have less than nothing, when you're overdrawn you have something ...a debt for the amount below zero.

But you've brought up something that hasn't been mentioned before in this thread (if that's still possible :eek:) and that is negative numbers. They look like they're less than nothing, but they're actually something lower than zero, where zero is a point on a scale.

For instance, 0°C is not actually no heat. No heat occurs at -276°C.

Posted: 29 Nov 2009 5:44 am
by Matthew Walton
And why are there so many different units of measurement for temperature? Nothing makes sense, why can't we just settle on two?
Fahrenheit
Celsius
Kelvins
Rankine
Delisle
Newton
...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_measurement
The logic here amounts to Nothing!

Posted: 29 Nov 2009 10:27 am
by Alan Brookes
Matthew Walton wrote:...why can't we just settle on two?...
I propose a seventh unit of temperature... the Tonebar Scale.
0°T will be the temperature at which the tonebar is too cold to handle.
100°T will be the temperature at which the tonebar is too hot to handle. ;-) 8) ;-)

Posted: 13 Dec 2009 7:16 pm
by Alan Brookes
Two weeks and NOTHING. Has everything been said on the subject ?

Posted: 13 Dec 2009 8:26 pm
by Don Kona Woods
I'm gettin NOTHING for Christmas, cuz I've been NOTHING but bad. :\ :\ :x

How bout you?

Merry Christmas and Aloha, :)
Don

Posted: 14 Dec 2009 2:10 am
by Dianne Best
Well I donno why we need all those darned numbers for temperature. Everybody knows there's only five temperatures anyway:

Friggin HOT, Hot, nice, cold, and FRIGGIN COLD!

Lately Manitoba has been the last one.

Oh, I am sorry. Did I interrupt the discussion of nothing in particular?

Posted: 14 Dec 2009 7:21 am
by Alan Brookes
Gulp ! You do realise that "friggin" invokes the Pagan Goddess Frigg, the goddess of sex and reproduction, and, until recent times, "friggin" was considered a worse swear word than the other f word, because in addition to referring to sex, it also invokes paganism, which was blasphemy. :whoa: People nowadays don't realise that and think it's not swearing. :(

I'd better say NOTHING. :)

Posted: 14 Dec 2009 11:42 am
by Dianne Best
Then I chose the right word! What else would you call -28c with a -44c windchill?

Posted: 14 Dec 2009 5:12 pm
by Richard Sevigny
Dianne Best wrote:Then I chose the right word! What else would you call -28c with a -44c windchill?
Cold enough to emasculate a brass monkey ;-)

Posted: 14 Dec 2009 5:48 pm
by Alan Brookes
Dianne Best wrote:Then I chose the right word! What else would you call -28c with a -44c windchill?
I call it you get the weather in the location you choose to live. I lived for 35 years in England and then moved to California, where I've been for another 30 years. People here get a slight chill and complain that it's cold. They don't have a clue. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Think of it this way. People in Africa are worried that Global warming is going to make their location unlivable. But where you are, global warming is going to make the North of Canada, Greenland and Alaska prime real estate. Everyone is going to want to move north ! If you want to get rich, buy land north of the Arctic Circle. In 30 years time it'll be worth many times what you paid for it. :D

Posted: 14 Dec 2009 9:57 pm
by Ken Lang
Back in the caveman days, the word for nothing was nobhotch. What was the word for something?
This is a trick question that I will answer for you.

There was no word for something, because nobody had nobhotch.

Posted: 15 Dec 2009 5:01 pm
by Alan Brookes
Ken Lang wrote:Back in the caveman days, the word for nothing was nobhotch...
Nice try Ken, but back in cavemen days no-one could read and write, so we have no idea what languages they spoke. The earliest any language can be constructed back is Indo-European, spoken about 5,000 B.C. Caveman were thousands of years earlier than that, and about their languages we know...
NOTHING.
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

(Of course, some people still live in caves.....)

Posted: 16 Dec 2009 8:25 am
by Roger Crawford
I'm glad something is keeping nothing going.

nothing

Posted: 18 Dec 2009 9:16 pm
by Jimmie Martin
How much does nothing cost?

Posted: 19 Dec 2009 11:07 am
by Alan Brookes
Different types of nothing cost different amounts, depending on what you have to remove to get to nothing.

Posted: 19 Dec 2009 3:32 pm
by Richard Sevigny
Alan Brookes wrote:Different types of nothing cost different amounts, depending on what you have to remove to get to nothing.
Take divorce as an example. My brother's boss spent $60,000 to end up with nothing. :eek:

Posted: 19 Dec 2009 3:37 pm
by Larry Rafferty
Alan Brookes wrote:Different types of nothing cost different amounts, depending on what you have to remove to get to nothing.
Alan...thank you for clearing that up !
Now I know what my grandpa meant when he said "nothing will make me spend $100 on a woman".

Posted: 19 Dec 2009 11:46 pm
by Don Kona Woods
Nothing would make a person do something they don't want to do....True or False?
Why did you think that?

Aloha, :)
Don