Page 8 of 13

Posted: 16 Dec 2008 8:05 pm
by Lee Baucum
Hmmm. I wonder how many of these guitars are actually covered in mica. Mica is short for Formica, which is a brand name of a laminate product. I'm guessing some builders may be using Wilsonart.

Posted: 16 Dec 2008 10:40 pm
by Danny Bates
Lee, I think all laminates are the same.

They are sheets of kraft paper laminated together with resin. Much like layers of fiberglass and resin on a boat except it's not woven together like fiberglass. This is why it's so strong and resistant to dings etc.

After the Kraft paper, is the color which is like the covering on a drumset. After the color is the melamine covering (real tough plastic) which gives it it's scratch resistance, gloss and "depth"


Image

Posted: 16 Dec 2008 11:46 pm
by Bo Legg
This is the only kind of laminate I like

Image

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 2:26 am
by Joe Rogers
Richard, your very first line of this thread read, "it's just an easy short-cut for manufacturers."

Somehow I don't think "an easy short-cut" was the original intention of putting mica on a guitar. Someone once told me that bolting an aluminum neck onto a wood body will gouge into the wood over time thus killing some sustain. Mica eliminates this.

Don't get me wrong. I have heard both wood and mica guitars that had tone to die for, so I am not taking sides. Just food for thought. Speaking of food.....I now think it is time to raid the fridge......

Joe Rogers

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 4:55 am
by Roual Ranes
Wood guitars are without a doubt the prettiest but if you keep a guitar as long as I do ......they ain't so pretty with all those use dings all over them. I bought mine to use and I do without worry.......I paid the price......I get to do the damage and mica looks better after so many years.

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 5:44 am
by Lee Baucum
Danny - My point was, we commonly refer to all laminates (on pedal steels) as "mica", which is short for Formica. Formica is a brand name of laminate.

It's akin to calling all tissues "kleenex". Here in the south, many of us refer to soft drinks as "cokes". "Yes, I'll have a coke, and make it a Dr. Pepper, please." :lol:

Formica vs. Wood

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 6:04 am
by Bill Duncan
There is something about the look of granite. Possibly a little heavy, but it would be different. Come to think of it; it probably would not be much heavier than an old D10 MSA!
Bill Duncan

mica

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 6:06 am
by Don Drummer
Mica covered steels? What can I say?

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 7:14 am
by Ray Kedge
Iv'e been looking back at all the helpful tips Richard has given to the forum when guys have been at a loss to sort out their problems,so cut the guy some slack when when he makes personal opinion on the look of a guitar.
I just hope he doesn't stop helping people out when they can't help themselves.Due to the flack he has taken over this.

Keep it comming Richard


Regards Ray

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 7:22 am
by John Drury
Bo Legg wrote:This is the only kind of laminate I like

Image
Bologna?

That looks more like a ham and cheese sammidge to me!

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 8:51 am
by Bo Legg
With the economy in the S can, I didn’t want to appear uppity and use Beef in my laminate.

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 8:54 am
by John Drury
My personal favorite in finishes is the Sho~Paper used on the Ashtray Mavericks. WowZaaaa!!!!
Image

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 9:06 am
by Lee Baucum
Sandwiches without mustard taste cheap and, oh wait. I forgot. I don't like mustard on my sandwiches. :D

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 9:07 am
by Brint Hannay
:)

EDIT: This was supposed to appear right after John Drury's post.

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 9:23 am
by Danny Bates
The Sho-let-paper was classy, but for the utmost in durability (except fire and the blood slinging "Anti-Animal Torture" folks), the classiest finish would be "Liberacesque" fur. Like ZZ Top's guitars.


Image

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 10:14 am
by Mike Perlowin
Lee Baucum wrote: I don't like mustard on my sandwiches.
Well I do, and the's fightin' words. How dare you have different tastes in condements as me, you dirty low down $%^$^&(% b%^&$^&^*+)_(* :x

Nest you'll be saying you don't like pepper on your scrambled eggs. Sheesh!

Just Kidding Lee. But I really do like mustard.

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 10:17 am
by John Drury
Danny Bates wrote:The Sho-let-paper was classy, but for the utmost in durability (except fire and the blood slinging "Anti-Animal Torture" folks), the classiest finish would be "Liberacesque" fur. Like ZZ Top's guitars.


Image
Not Baa-aa-aa-aa-aa-aa-aad!

I love the look of real wood

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 10:34 am
by Rich Peterson
My red lacquer MSA Classic looked so-o-o-o beautiful until I screwed up and let a cable bouncing around inside the case trash the finish. It upset me so much, I couldn't look at it. Didn't play steel for many years.

If I had bought the white Formica instead, I would have had years more fun, and probably be a really good player.

If I get a PSG custom made, I might have it match the DiPinto Belvedere DeLuxe in my avatar photo: White body with a black carved top, huge white pearloid pickguard, and siver sparkle pickup rings and the entire face of the headstock. (In spite of all that gaudiness, it's a good sounding axe, and the best neck I've EVER played.)

I vote for durability.

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 10:40 am
by Danny Bates
John,

Play that fur covered pedal steel and wear an outfit like Elton is wearing in this pic. Make sure the first song is that one by Tom T. Hall... "I like little baby ducks..."

Image

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 12:55 pm
by John Ummel
I watched a show about Thelonius Monk on the History channel yesterday evening. It struck me what a piece of crap finish was on piano he was playing in one sequence...but his MIND was busy creating those awesome jazz riffs.... 8)

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 1:35 pm
by Les Anderson
Bo Legg; you make bologna sandwiches???????????????

If you fry that angelic food: what time do you serve up lunch?

Missouri isn't all that far away for me to travel to share and partake in a fried bologna sandwich.

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 1:39 pm
by basilh
Fascinating to read from the beginning, Because, starting at the end page one would be of the impression that Richard had gone "Over the Top" with some form of insult, when in fact nothing of the sort occurred.
If YOU are reading this from the end, I humbly suggest that you go to page one and TRY and find what the hullabaloo is about, I can't.

Richard I'm sure wasn't attempting to bait anyone by this post,. just expressing HIS opinion, as is his right.

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 2:22 pm
by Donny Hinson
Joe Rogers wrote:Richard, your very first line of this thread read, "it's just an easy short-cut for manufacturers."
It's a lot more involved than wiping on some stain and then spraying a few coats of something on top. The only "involved" part of finishing a new steel guitar is the inlay work (really easy if you have the tools) and the cure times between coats of finish. I've done furniture restoration and auto bodywork, and there ain't nothin' much easier than spraying on a finish.
Someone once told me that bolting an aluminum neck onto a wood body will gouge into the wood over time thus killing some sustain. Mica eliminates this.
If that "someone" tells you anything else, it might be best if you ignored him. :wink:

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 3:40 pm
by Ivan Posa
My New Zum is so ugly I am considering sending it back to Bruce for a refund.
Image

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 4:26 pm
by chris ivey
the emmons co. originally made quite a definite distinction that they didn't use formica...it was 'mica glass'..as i recall...i think it may have been way more musically inclined than a countertop. perhaps someone who knows the inherent tonal response differences could chime (!) in!