Page 61 of 172
Posted: 21 May 2009 5:11 pm
by Steve Atwood
Well, I tried. Actually it's 10/82 nothing and 72/82 something. That was the least I could do. Remember, you can't have pure nothing. "There's always something."
Posted: 22 May 2009 7:58 am
by Rick Collins
Someone should declare this thread "Null and Void".
But, is null something and void nothing,
or, is void something and null nothing,
or, are they both something,
or, are they both nothing?
I'm assuming they are both nothing.
But, I still cannot decide which is the better nothing.
Is it nothing or nuthin'?
Posted: 22 May 2009 8:04 am
by Richard Sevigny
Rick Collins wrote:
Is it nothing or nuthin'?
That, Rick, depends on where you live and
nothing else.
Posted: 22 May 2009 8:10 am
by Scott Shipley
Nothing is better than nothing.
Posted: 22 May 2009 9:06 am
by Rick Collins
That, Rick, depends on where you live and nothing else.
Rich, I was thinking that it might depend on the color of my neck and
nothing else.
Why is it, I know so much more about dermatology than I do geography.
Posted: 22 May 2009 1:44 pm
by Alan Brookes
Rick Collins wrote:...Is it nothing or nuthin'?
It's
nuffink.
Nuffink?
Posted: 22 May 2009 2:13 pm
by Richard Sevigny
..or nuffin'... or nuttin'... sometimes de big Goose Egg...
...uh yeah, you get it
Posted: 22 May 2009 2:53 pm
by Archie Nicol
Alan; as a Brit, nothing annoys me more than people saying the letter `H` as Haitch instead of Aitch. I lie of course. There are many fings that annoy me more.
Arch.
Posted: 22 May 2009 4:01 pm
by Alan Brookes
As a Brit, one of the things that annoys me is the way some people pronounce names where
t and
h happen to come next to each other, as if they were
th as in
thing. In ALL of the following names, the
th should be pronounced as a
t...
Thomas is pronounced
Tomas
Mathilda is pronounced
Matilda
Aretha is pronounced
Areta
Anthony is pronounced
Antony
Theresa is pronounced
Teresa
Thames is pronounced
Tems
Thailand is pronounced
Tiland
Luthier is pronounced
Lutier
Thaddeus is pronounced
Taddeus
Theador is pronounced
Teador
Thelma is pronounced
Telma
Even people who have had these names all their lives are often unaware as to how to pronounce their own names. This is particularly so with
Anthony and
Theador, yet those people never question why they get abbreviated to
Tony and
Teddy, and
NOT Thony and
Theddy.
I'm sure you're all aware of many more examples. What can we do about it ?
NOTHING.
Posted: 23 May 2009 2:58 am
by Archie Nicol
`Tony and Teddy, and NOT Thony and Theddy`.
I know. It's enough to make you thick!
Arch.
Posted: 23 May 2009 3:11 am
by Paul Graupp
Posted: 23 May 2009 10:05 am
by Alan Brookes
..and let's not forget the additional letters in the English alphabet,
yod and
thorn, both of which succumbed to the printing trade. So, words like
the, this, that and
those, used to be spelt
¥e, ¥is, ¥at and
¥ose.
(I'm using the nearest character in the ASCI table). Modern eyes look at those words and think that they're
ye, yis, yat and
yose. The word
YE has
NEVER been used as the definite article. It has always been the plural of THOU, or, originally THEE.
Add to this the fact that, in the middle ages, stonemasons and signwriters were paid by the letter, so they loved to double consonants and add
es to words. That's why they often spelt
shop as
shoppe, and all those words ending in c used to end in ck.... physick, comick, panick, chronick, alphabetick, etc.
(no, not etck.)
So we have
¥e Olde Shoppe, which would
NEVER have been pronounced
Ye Oldy Shoppy.
It has
ALWAYS been pronounced
The Old Shop .
What can we do about it ?
NOTHING.
Posted: 23 May 2009 2:13 pm
by Archie Nicol
And another thing! Mispronun..?..mispronou..?..mispronouncia...???!!!. People saying words wrong!
eg: Febuary, nukular(Bushism), secetary, etc.
Erch.
Posted: 23 May 2009 3:47 pm
by Alan Brookes
It's been happening for years. 40% of our language is mispronounced Mediæval French, which itself is mispronounced Latin. Another 40% is mispronounced and simplified Old Saxon and Old Norse. The "s" on the end of verbs, such as goes, comes, takes, only turned up because half of the country lisped when saying goeth, cometh, taketh
(pronounced goth, comth, takth... the e wasn't pronounced until people started reading the King James version of the Bible.)
And it's not only English. Modern French no longer pronounces most of the verb endings or consonants at the end of words unless they're followed by a word starting in a vowel. The following words are ALL pronounced the same in French...
donner, donnez, donnai, donnais, donnaient, donné, donnée, données, donnés, donnait
Whereas the Dutch seem to revise their spellings every few decades, and their consonants are disappearing or changing. Goeden Morgan is nowadays pronounced houimorgn. The d's are gradually changing to t's, so goed (pronounced good) is becoming goot.
Yes Archie, what is the world coming to ?
One and
two used to rhyme with
bone and
throw. Whatever happened to the first
d in We
dnesday ? Someone already stole the
g in Fri
gday and the
n in Satur
nday, not to mention one of the
o's in Mo
onday.
And what can we do about it ?
NOTHING.
Posted: 23 May 2009 4:38 pm
by b0b
<hr>
<hr>That's nothing. How about
this?
Posted: 24 May 2009 11:29 am
by Rick Collins
b0b wrote:<hr>
<hr>That's nothing. How about
this?
I beg your pardon b0b; but that page is not blank.
It contains type reading:
This page intentionally left blank
Again, I cannot find any
nothing here.
Does
nothing actually exist?
Posted: 24 May 2009 3:03 pm
by Archie Nicol
Today, nothing cheered me up more than this:
kick here
Nae luck, Celtic.
Gerrit right up ye!
Arch.
Posted: 24 May 2009 8:40 pm
by Edward Meisse
Uhhhhhh......we could take the o out of nothing. And we could put it in Monday. We could then restore Moonday to its original spelling. But it would change nothing, I'm afraid.
Posted: 25 May 2009 9:24 am
by Alan Brookes
Yes, it would change nothing. Then we would have...
NTHING.
Posted: 25 May 2009 10:04 am
by Darryl Waltisperger
Posted: 25 May 2009 10:18 am
by Paul Graupp
But why doesn't February have 30 days by taking one away from each January and March. The result is no change in days so we'd have gnihton to worry about; Right ?? Or is it Left....
Regards, Paul
Posted: 25 May 2009 6:55 pm
by Alan Brookes
Or, better still, have thirteen months, each of four weeks. That makes 52 weeks, or 364 days. The extra say could be a holiday thrown into the middle of the year. The beauty of having ever month exactly four weeks is that every month would be exactly the same...
Su M T W Th F St
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The above would serve for every month for every year.
In case you think I thought this up all on my own, I didn't. Accountants thought it up centuries ago. The first job I had was in local government in England, and they used thirteen Accounting Periods each year.
What can we do to get it changed ?
NOTHING.
Posted: 25 May 2009 8:30 pm
by Darryl Waltisperger
Posted: 26 May 2009 2:30 am
by Paul Graupp
Posted: 26 May 2009 6:19 am
by Richard Sevigny
Paul Graupp wrote:I still don't know why some ancient thought one month should be shortest.
Nothing to it. February is cabin fever month. It already lasts forever... so why stretch it out further??