Page 7 of 7
Posted: 20 Dec 2006 1:37 pm
by Herb Steiner
Just a little dose of reality from outside the steel world for y'all. The guitarist I work with, a monster in jazz and country who at age 29 knows more theory than I will ever assimilate in my life, saw this thread this past weekend and asked me:
"E flat or D sharp? Is this what you guys argue about?"
I told him the next discussion will be about "how many angels can dance on the tip of a fingerpick."
BTW, I agree with Paul and David. If you're talking the key of E, it's D#. If not, it's whatever you want it to be.
BTW #2, if a guy on the bandstand calls out "play this one in D#," you can tell him "there ain't no such key as D#. But I'll bet E flat works just as good."
(There is a D# minor key, though... the relative minor of F# major. But the unused non-keys are A#, D#, G#, Cb, Db minor, and Gb minor. Too many double accidentals in these non-keys to make it worth writing out.)
------------------
Herb's Steel Guitar Pages
Texas Steel Guitar Association
<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Herb Steiner on 20 December 2006 at 01:40 PM.]</p></FONT>
Posted: 20 Dec 2006 1:39 pm
by Bob Hoffnar
Bob Lee and all, The melodic minor scale originated in early counterpoint. The notes were raised or lowered depending on there harmonic function. It wasn't a jazz chord thing. It was more of cadential formula based on the church rule that nothing could end in minor. The 5 chord comes right before the final 1 chord. The 5 chord needs to be major so the leading tone can move a half step to its final destination. That gives you the (jazz terminology) major 7th when acending in your minor mode.
------------------
Bob
upcoming gigs
My Website
Posted: 20 Dec 2006 4:36 pm
by Bobby Lee
So, you're saying that it would sound wrong in that music to go
down from a 5 chord to a 1m through the major7 note? Seems to me that, if you're on the 5 chord you would always raise the 7th tone of the minor scale, whether the melody was ascending or descending. Consider this:
<font face="monospace" size="3"><pre>chord: Cm G7
notes: G Ab Bb C D (ascending)
chord: G7 Cm
notes: D C B A G (descending) </pre></font> That seems right to me, but it's the opposite of what the "rule" would dictate:
<font face="monospace" size="3"><pre>chord: Cm G7
notes: G A B C D (ascending)
chord: G7 Cm
notes: D C Bb Ab G (descending) </pre></font>
------------------
<font size="1"><img align=right src="
http://b0b.com/b0b2005.gif" width="78 height="78">
Bobby Lee (a.k.a. b0b) - email:
quasar@b0b.com -
gigs -
CDs,
Open Hearts
Williams D-12
E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (
F Diatonic)
Sierra Laptop S-8 (
E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (
E13, C6 or A6)
My Blog </font>
<p style="display:none">
<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by b0b on 20 December 2006 at 04:39 PM.]</p></FONT><font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by b0b on 20 December 2006 at 04:40 PM.]</p></FONT>
Posted: 20 Dec 2006 7:08 pm
by C. Christofferson
Bob & Bob, both of the examples could be interpreted to sound both correct and/or incorrect - depending on the scalar Mode that the song has been orchestrated to be in. The differences (in the examples) would have to be further differentiated as to whether they are part of an ascending /descending rule or not, or as notes defining the mode (there being several minor modes), once that has been factored in, then you could perhaps re-ask the question... not to mention that the melody could at any time jump to a different mode than the songs overall mode etc.<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by C. Christofferson on 20 December 2006 at 07:23 PM.]</p></FONT>
Posted: 20 Dec 2006 8:00 pm
by Brandon Ordoyne
You know guys a yes or no answer would have worked for me. I am new to PSG. I did not realize this was a touchy subject...hahaha
It is interesting how much theory is behind this instrument!
------------------
Thanks!
Brandon Ordoyne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carter-Starter
Peavy Blazer 158
Posted: 20 Dec 2006 8:16 pm
by C. Christofferson
Srry Brandon youre right. How are you liking your Carter ? At the moment i would be happy to upgrade to that guitar.
Posted: 20 Dec 2006 8:22 pm
by Brandon Ordoyne
Well I am enjoying my Carter Starter. I dont think you want to upgrade to it, it is a beginnner guitar. It works great for me, even though I dont know much on it, plus its the only one I have ever played
I start lessons on Jan 2nd.
------------------
Thanks!
Brandon Ordoyne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carter-Starter
Peavy Blazer 158
Posted: 20 Dec 2006 9:15 pm
by Brint Hannay
<SMALL>You know guys a yes or no answer would have worked for me.</SMALL>
And you got it--in the second reply, from Alan Brookes! (quoted in full):
<SMALL>Yes!</SMALL>
Posted: 20 Dec 2006 10:42 pm
by David L. Donald
I think the acending and decending rule has less to do with scales,
and more to do with voice leading in harmonization.
Notes tend to fall or rise to their next chord,
.
So like a blue note in a blues or jazz;
You bend up to some notes and bend down to others.
In classical on organ or harpsichord,
there was no bending,
so they 'sometimes' alternated the grace notes.
Posted: 20 Dec 2006 11:41 pm
by Bob Hoffnar
Back when the church made the rules for western music it had little to do with how it sounded. There were just some goofy rules( voice leading/cadential formula stuff ) composers had to go by or they would be slowly impaled by perverted monks. It had nothing to do with vertical harmony as we think of it. There wasn't anything called chords at the time.
Common practice issues came later with the minor modes and the melodic minor still had practical application.
------------------
Bob
upcoming gigs
My Website
Posted: 21 Dec 2006 9:42 pm
by David L. Donald
Woe's be he who played a tri-tone back then.
The devil's chord and a burnable offence.
Nobody had showed how it could easily be
used as a passing chord, diminished or minor7b5
it was listened to alone and out of it's context
and sounded demonic to some.
It was also too heard to sing for the masses,
and several dukes and bishops.
Now most american car horns use this alone,
because it cuts through most background noise.<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by David L. Donald on 21 December 2006 at 09:44 PM.]</p></FONT>