Tonight(Sat),I had the opprotunity to hear RR on what I believe was an ACL rerun. If it was a rerun,Im sure most of you have seen this particular performance before.
Please keep in mind that up to now,I've read all of the forum posts about RR over this considerable period of time without having really heard him play a whole set. Now Ive heard him. That being said, I'll offer up a few observations.....jmho, tho.
1.Robert's sound, technique & phrasing reminds me of a really accomplished R&R-blues slide/electric guitarist; maybe someone like D.Lindley, Ry Cooder or Jeff Healy. But nothing there to promote PSG, as far as I can see. However,I was impressed with his ability to express his emotions in his playing; thats the hallmark of a true musician.
2. I suspect that those lay persons who would accept RR as a bona-fide representative of the PSG would probably not spend much time checking out other steel guitarists recorded works. And if they did,the minute they heard something other than the aforementioned R&R/bluesy slide sound, they'd likely head back to where they bought the CD, claiming false advertising & expect a refund. Just because you can fly an "ultra-lite" it dont make you a pilot. And thats not taking ANYTHING away from RR's abilities or, Im sure, the many years he's spent playing & practicing. So if youve already decided to flame me, dont even go there:-(
3. I get the feeling that all this hub-bub about RR comes from a number of steel players who, for one reason or another havent had the gumption or intestinal fortitude mixed with perseverance to sit down & learn where all their favorite "New Country" licks came from; ie. how many out there can really play the intro to "I'll Come Runnin" or tastefully support the singer, or can really play a pretty, pleasing melody on a country song for a solo, instead of dropping in their "pet licks" & moving from position to position w/o regard for the melody or chord changes? ....If the shoe fits....
3. Im somewhat reminded of the apparently irreparable damage Pete Drake did to the PSG during its infancy. If Im wrong on this, then why is the current state of our instrument in such a depression that some have been led down a more comercially acceptable path? ie, licks instead of feeling..sexy R&R instead of what comes natural to the PSG. Now there are those, who for one reason or another still sing Pete's prases; (I guess they're beholdin' to him...after all,its the Nashville way
, and they would argue that point, but the present state of affairs bears that fact out. Hence,
many are looking for a new way to go...a path of least resistance, if you will. Robert Randolph may be that path. Or, like a songwriter said to me on a session the other day.."oh no!! not so 'OPRY'...more attitude!"
I packed up & left.
Its just a suggestion, but before you go out to get a D-13 & some more fx, try learing whats already been done on the PSG.
Yeah yeah, i know the argument..."why do whats already been done?"
But the answer is simple; without a foundation, yer house will crumble at the first tremor. It takes alot of time & dedication to REALLY play the PSG. If you get to thinking youve invented something,
Im sure that if you'll do yer homework you'll find that someone somewhere has already done it. You think Buddy or Doug or Paul havent messed with that? Go hear PF with The Players; plenty of funk, blues & R&R there.
4. I was saddenned to see a reference to Roberts ethnicity....not criticizing anyone here, but it shouldnt matter what race one is vs. how it affects their commercial appeal. However, I understand the argument. But think of this... what if RR went out & played "Blue Jade" or "Donna Lee"? Now the audience reaction to that would be well worth the price of a ticket....talk about tearing down some walls for the PSG!!
I guess what Im saying is; what RR does works for RR, that dont mean it works for everybody. If you think for 1 minute that RR's visibility will put taters on yer plate (whether you play or build PSG's), yer sadly mistaken.
Each time someone performs on the PSG, whatever the venue, if your performance doesnt strongly hint at your potential, you do a disservice to the instrument & those who've come before you & made yer little gig possible. RR's playing certainly hints at a strong potential. The equation is: desire + practice, practice, practice = finesse & a more than "acceptable" tone. btw..jeez, where did that submission to mediocrity come from, anyway? Thats like saying,"well, I almost missed that car"
.
Now the giants have certainly provided us with more than a few meals... why not honor them with your dedication, perseverance & gratitude instead of changing horses everytime the going gets a little rough. I remember when being a steel player really meant something. Getting your horseshoe ring from your mentor when he felt that you deserved it (still got mine, thx DK!
.
Maybe Im going back too far, but when I see that look in someones eyes that tells me theyre listening, im proud to be where I am, be it concert or s***hole. We provide escape to those who toil & labor so we can do what we do. They still like the "old stuff", but I fear many players out there view the golden oldies as un-hip or too politically incorrect. If thats yer bent, yer on the wrong horse.
I wish RR all the best & Ive been told he's an exceptionally fine human being. I admire what he does & how he carries himself. It just concerns me that some would elevate him to the level of the second coming of the PSG.
That fellow is already here,however. Tune him in next Friday nite on the Opry. If you want to study something, take TW's style apart, then you'll have some idea of what Im talking about.
sincerely,
mc