Agreed Jim, BUT here's the rub, you and I and the members of this forum are not the yardstick by which record companies judge popularity, It's SALES and public image that count, I think the qualifier SHOULD exclude leased and self financed "PROJECTS' I say projects because in the REAL world of recordings, that's all they're considered, projects or glorified "Demo's".Jim Sliff wrote: I guess my point is that the "major label" qualifier/time warp is irrelevant IMO - it may (or may not) eliminate too much good music from consideration..
Artist don't have to PAY a record company to release an album as you say, record companies pay the performer for their services.