David, my beef was with the attitude that it's the wrong aproach, and the insistence that a lot of other information is necessary. The implication that guitar players are looking for an easy way out or are lazy was very clear.
"He said knowing only neck patterns is why “many 6 string players have such a hard time with steel.”
Right - but instead of working within that knowledge and trying to offer the information (pictures) asked for, he decided to show how it's a deficient way of approaching the instrument.
But the point is (that I feel he didn't get at all), we we're talkng about a *starting* point, and while you can add all those other positions and info that's not what the "box" discussion was about. All it creates is sensory overload and more than what's being asked for, as if to prove a point of superior knowledge, which is irrelevant.
start slinging over-the-top insults back
All I pointed out was that the dissing of the box approach wasn't helpful - he reacted with over-the-top fabrications. Who's being sensitive?
As Ben has clearly stated and graphically represented, it's not brain surgery, and it is a DIFFERENT way of thinking/seeing than most steel players take.
I think you can also overcome the "everything on one fret" issue by laying out the block WITH pedal use - if the pedals actually form a pattern more familiar to guitar players, that's a good thing.
It's all about getting more people interested in and comfortable with the instrument, and the biggest draw is going to be people who already play guitar. So if these simple boxes can be shown - again, as a *starting place* - guitar players would be able to comprehend the basics more quickly, and THAT would get them moving to more advanced stuff as well. But there really could be more "common language" (or in this case, visuals) between steel and guitar...or as Ben said, we get lost in word-descriptions of scales and modes, and also in tab, which teaches you songs or riffs - but not positions where you can come up with your OWN riffs.