USB audio interface suggestions?

Studio and home recording topics

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

Post Reply
User avatar
Dave Van Allen
Posts: 6161
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Souderton, PA , US , Earth
Contact:

USB audio interface suggestions?

Post by Dave Van Allen »

i'm looking for a simple USB I/O for a stereo pair... any reccomendations?

so far likely candidates are:
Edirol UA-1EX
M-Audio Transit USB

any other inexpensive options?

I just want to get from my mixer into my Macs and back
User avatar
Stu Schulman
Posts: 6524
Joined: 15 Oct 1998 12:01 am
Location: Ulster Park New Yawk (deceased)

Post by Stu Schulman »

Dave..about 10 posts down the Behringer will do what you need $30.00...Stu
Steve Robinson
Posts: 91
Joined: 9 Dec 2004 1:01 am

Post by Steve Robinson »

I like the Behringer UCA202 (don't get the 200 - no headphone jack). Simple, cheap, works.
User avatar
Will Holtz
Posts: 335
Joined: 5 Mar 2004 1:01 am
Location: San Francisco, California, USA
Contact:

Post by Will Holtz »

A used Tascam US-122 will do the trick and can be found for quite cheap.
User avatar
Dave Van Allen
Posts: 6161
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Souderton, PA , US , Earth
Contact:

Post by Dave Van Allen »

on older and used units I am concerned about the OS level compatibility... need it to work with OS X.4 on a mac with intel processor....
also on the behringer, any thoughts on OS X compatibility?
User avatar
Will Holtz
Posts: 335
Joined: 5 Mar 2004 1:01 am
Location: San Francisco, California, USA
Contact:

Post by Will Holtz »

Dave Van Allen wrote:need it to work with OS X.4 on a mac with intel processor....
This driver should get a US-122 working on your machine.
User avatar
Dave Van Allen
Posts: 6161
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Souderton, PA , US , Earth
Contact:

Post by Dave Van Allen »

looked up the specs and the Tascam does MIDI as well?! interesting... thanks for the heads up and the link.

I'm gonna try out a behrenger 'cause the price is rediculous, but having both audio/MIDI together would be cool
User avatar
Will Holtz
Posts: 335
Joined: 5 Mar 2004 1:01 am
Location: San Francisco, California, USA
Contact:

Post by Will Holtz »

The Behringer unit only does 16 bit recording. I'd recommend getting something that does 24 bits. You'll have much more headroom to work with
Steven Cherson
Posts: 115
Joined: 8 Dec 1998 1:01 am
Location: Austin, TX.

Post by Steven Cherson »

Dave, I use an Apogee Mini-Me, has bit rate up to 24/96 will do auto conversion to 16/44.1 for the drive in the Mac. Supports core audio, does not need asio drivers.

You should not skimp on cables. I use Zaolla 1/4" - RCA
User avatar
Dave Van Allen
Posts: 6161
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Souderton, PA , US , Earth
Contact:

Post by Dave Van Allen »

thnks steven- The price tag on the apogee is a bit more than I was intending to spend for bedroom recording :shock:

but it's good to know such nice things exist
Mark Butcher
Posts: 167
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 12:01 am
Location: Scotland

Post by Mark Butcher »

Why not use your macs audio inputs connected to aux outs on your mixer. Cost nil.

Mark
User avatar
Dave Van Allen
Posts: 6161
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Souderton, PA , US , Earth
Contact:

Post by Dave Van Allen »

I have been doing that on the desktop mac but besides the intel mini I also have an iBook with no audio input jack, just a headphone jack on it. expanding the options of portability...
Mark Butcher
Posts: 167
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 12:01 am
Location: Scotland

Post by Mark Butcher »

You could use an iMic by Griffin. Cheap small easy. I have been being told I needed expensive hardware since the Audiomedia card in 87. I heard no discernable difference in the audio quality with that then and the Mac's on board sounds fine now too. If I recorded for a living I would have a Pro Tools rig but for home recording I don't need it. I fancy a Zoom H4 mind you, that looks handy.

Mark
User avatar
Darvin Willhoite
Posts: 5778
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Roxton, Tx. USA

Post by Darvin Willhoite »

I use a Tascam US122, I tried some of the M-Audio boxes and didn't like them nearly as much as the Tascam. The Tascam also comes with Cubasis recording software, and GIGA studio synth software.
Darvin Willhoite
MSA Millennium, Legend, and Studio Pro, Reese's restored Universal Direction guitar, a restored MSA Classic SS, several amps, new and old, and a Kemper Powerhead that I am really liking. Also a Zum D10, a Mullen RP, and a restored Rose S10, named the "Blue Bird". Also, I have acquired and restored the plexiglass D10 MSA Classic that was built as a demo in the early '70s. I also have a '74 lacquer P/P, with wood necks, and a showroom condition Sho-Bud Super Pro.
User avatar
Dave Van Allen
Posts: 6161
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Souderton, PA , US , Earth
Contact:

Post by Dave Van Allen »

well I got the Behrenger box... it seems to work as advertised and is meeting my needs for now... it's a cheap piece of crap (the stick-on label on the front is peeilng up already just from sitting on the desk) but it is doing the job. I even was able to patch it in to my phonograph/tuner setup and record some of my vinyl into the iBook. I haven't tried tracking any steel yet. We'll see how that goes.

if I need to get more exotic I would spend a bit more money on probably a Tascam unit...

I am at this point just relying on it for home "bedroom studio", my own demos and not as a pro recording device.

I have a pal who produces Jingles who has a PT rig if I want to get serious

thanks for the advice folks-
we can close this if you want... or not
Post Reply

Return to “Recording”