Volume pots -- AGAIN.

Steel guitar amplifiers, effects, etc.

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

Post Reply
User avatar
Dag Wolf
Posts: 989
Joined: 15 Mar 1999 1:01 am
Location: Bergen, Norway

Volume pots -- AGAIN.

Post by Dag Wolf »

I see that many steel players are not satisfied with some of the pot`s for vol peds. I`ve just ran in to a batch of newer "Clarostrats" that were awful.

I tried the vol peds from a couple of steel playing friends.

The problem are that on a scale from 0 to 10 the pots worked like there was NO 1,2 or 3.
It was from zero to 4 with just barely move of the pedal.
I couldn`t play a balled type of song at all.

As it turned out my backup vol ped had the same pot and is just as terrible.

What is going on?

Are the new Canadian pots better?

Yeah forget it ...no joke about pots.... ;-)

Inputs are appreciated.

Dag


<font size="1" color="#8e236b"><p align="center">[This message was edited by Dag Wolf on 07 July 2005 at 05:00 PM.]</p></FONT>
Jan Hess
Posts: 40
Joined: 30 Mar 2005 1:01 am
Location: Winnipeg,Manitoba,Can.

Post by Jan Hess »

Hi Dag;Ive never changed one yet, but I know a small company here that sells them. Here is the link- http://www.linkonguitars.ca/steels.html The gentlemans name is Wayne Link,you could ask him your question.Good luck. Image

------------------
<font face="monospace" size="3"><pre>Soundhound</pre></font>
John Bresler
Posts: 1220
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Thornton, Colorado

Post by John Bresler »

Here's a link to a discussion about the Canadian pots. Lots of good comments.
http://steelguitarforum.com/Forum11/HTML/007232.html

JB
Image
User avatar
Ricky Davis
Posts: 10964
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Bertram, Texas USA
Contact:

Post by Ricky Davis »

Dag; yes indeed; the Ohmite pot is much much more superior to the clarostat, as the clarostat is PURE Garbage...ha.
Ricky
User avatar
Bob Hoffnar
Posts: 9244
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Austin, Tx
Contact:

Post by Bob Hoffnar »

Dag,
I used the Canadian pots also for the last 5 years. They are the best I could find. They sound fine and last. Although I eventually gave up and tried out a Hilton. I didn't want to like it so much but the Hilton blew me away. No more pots for me.

------------------
Bob
My Website

Image


Donny Hinson
Posts: 21192
Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.

Post by Donny Hinson »

Well, it sounds like the problem is that someone is supplying linear taper pots instead of audio taper, or log taper pots. I've run across distributors who tried to tell me that "the linear taper is a manufacturer's equivalent, and will work fine".

Bullhockey! Image

The pot <u>has</u> to have a log or audio taper to work properly. Accept nothing else.

End of story.
Charlie Shifflett
Posts: 349
Joined: 23 Feb 2005 1:01 am
Location: Colorado City, Texas, USA

Post by Charlie Shifflett »

About volume pots
I gave $3500 for a canadian pot and your right aboutitstinks Its on or off Iam still looking for a good pot for an emmons ped.
Thanks Charlie
User avatar
Mark Herrick
Posts: 1154
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Bakersfield, CA

Post by Mark Herrick »

<SMALL>I gave $3500 for a canadian pot...</SMALL>
Hey, I've got a good one I'll sell ya for only $3,000...

Image

------------------
Image

User avatar
Earnest Bovine
Posts: 8318
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Los Angeles CA USA

Post by Earnest Bovine »

$3500 Canadian is not so much really.
User avatar
Mark Herrick
Posts: 1154
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Bakersfield, CA

Post by Mark Herrick »

Must be really good pot...
User avatar
Alan Harrison
Posts: 589
Joined: 17 Apr 2005 12:01 am
Location: Murfreesboro Tennessee, USA

Post by Alan Harrison »

After paying $25 ea for 3 Canadian Pots and none of worked more than three days, I bought a Hilton. Love the clear sound and even taper of the signal. Cost me $75 to find out how good the Hilton Pedals are.
Post Reply