The Steel Guitar Forum Store 

Post new topic 3chord pedal hookup
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  3chord pedal hookup
Larry Robbins


From:
Fort Edward, New York
Post  Posted 14 Feb 2004 6:59 pm    
Reply with quote

I play my 72ish proII through a Nash 400.A lot of folks suggested I try useing the 3 chord hook up a lot of others use.I gave it a try.Not bad....but I find to my ear that I much prefer the sound of my steel when hooked up:steel> steeldriver II>Sho~Bud volume pedal> Nash 400.I know its a "season
to taste"type of thing,but dose anyone else prefer it this way?It just seems to sound more"Sho~Buddy" this way.
edited to say: oops,I think this should have been put in electronics!

[This message was edited by Larry Robbins on 15 February 2004 at 05:02 AM.]

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Allan Thompson

 

From:
Scotland.
Post  Posted 15 Feb 2004 6:05 am    
Reply with quote

Larry,
I tried the three lead set up, didn`t like it. I set up the same way you do.
Push Pull Emmons to Hilton volume pedal to Nashville 400 amp.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Jon Light (deceased)


From:
Saugerties, NY
Post  Posted 15 Feb 2004 6:10 am    
Reply with quote

If I'm not mistaken (big if), both of you are already using impedance matching devices (Steel Driver, Hilton pedal) that make the 3 cord rig redundant and unnecessary.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Larry Robbins


From:
Fort Edward, New York
Post  Posted 15 Feb 2004 6:23 am    
Reply with quote

You are NOT mistaken Jon!
My question was more to see how many others found this hook-up more pleasing to the ear!
I found quite a lot of difference between the two hook-ups inspite of the fact that they are both impedence matching devices.
Thanks.

------------------
Sho-Bud ProII
"there's been an awful murder, down on music row!"

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

C Dixon

 

From:
Duluth, GA USA
Post  Posted 15 Feb 2004 8:09 am    
Reply with quote

Jon,

You are correct.

The soul purpose for the three cord set up is to allow the full signal from the PU to reach the amp without the mismatch of the voulume pedal, or other devices.

This insures that NO attenuation, or distortion, or roll of certain frequencies, is introduced from the PU to the amp.

The anamoly here; and why some prefer it one way versus another was explained a while back when a question was asked,

"Why do the old 8" inch tube amps sound better than the new powerful transistor amps?"

The answer is quite simple. IF one takes the raw sound from a steel guitar and amplifies it flat, IE, NO change (save level) to the sound, MOST will not like it.

Without us realizing it, our ears become accustomed to hearing sound amplification fraught with built in problems. We get used to it. When those problems are remedied with ever higher fidelity equipment, like matching devices, many will say "I like the old better". What is happening is, the new equipment uncovers ALL the sounds the guitar is putting out. The older equipment masked it more or less.

This is why some do not like to use 3 cables. Putting a NON matching type volume pedal between the PU and the amp causes highs (and some mids) to roll off; meaning they are not heard in the speaker or are greatly attenuated. This is particularly true when it comes to overtones.

When you use a 3 cord setup on the other hand, you will hear these highs, certain mids and a slew of overtones that the guitar is actually putting out, and as is witnessed here, some do not care for them. And this is fine. To each his own.

However, IF you want to amplify the total sound coming off the guitar's PU, you MUST use either a 3 cord setup; OR a matching device of some kind between the PU and the amp.

carl
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Gene Jones

 

From:
Oklahoma City, OK USA, (deceased)
Post  Posted 15 Feb 2004 10:43 am    
Reply with quote

In the 1980's when I first bought a Sesssion 500 I used the recommended three-cord hook-up for awhile.....but eventually reverted back to two cords because I was unable to "hear" enough difference at bandstand volume to bother with hooking up the extra cord.

However, those three cords sure did look cool and because of that I think they may have been perceived by some players as being more of an improvement than they actually were!

www.genejones.com
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

b0b


From:
Cloverdale, CA, USA
Post  Posted 15 Feb 2004 5:37 pm    
Reply with quote

Moved to 'Electronics' section
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Ron Randall

 

From:
Dallas, Texas, USA
Post  Posted 16 Feb 2004 8:54 pm    
Reply with quote

Hey, ain't it great that Peavey gave us the option?

Ron

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Mike Brown

 

From:
Meridian, Mississippi USA
Post  Posted 17 Feb 2004 8:01 am    
Reply with quote

Carl Dixon is exactly correct with his explanation. It seems that when a problem occurs, we sometimes find a way to "work around it" instead of resolving the problem itself. The Peavey 3 cord hookup is not a "bandaid". It solves the problem should you choose to use it.

Mike Brown
Peavey Electronics Corporation
View user's profile Send private message

Nicholas Dedring

 

From:
Beacon, New York, USA
Post  Posted 17 Feb 2004 11:11 am    
Reply with quote

I use three cords, and like if for no other reason than that I never found a way to use the steel driver that I liked. If I bumped the signal up, I got too much volume coming through the pedal... couldn't get it near "full off", which I like it to be when I roll back.

Second advantage to three cords is that if I'm plugging more than one thing in, i.e. pedal steel and lap steel at the same time, I can just use one volume pedal. You can always roll the highs back off on the eq if you want to...
View user's profile Send private message

Gene Jones

 

From:
Oklahoma City, OK USA, (deceased)
Post  Posted 17 Feb 2004 11:49 am    
Reply with quote

(Mike)....The Peavey 3 cord hookup is not a "bandaid".....

I didn't have a problem, I just didn't think the 3-cord hookup improved anything. Assuming by your reply that you use (or did use) the 3 cord hookup...what problem did it solve for you?

www.genejones.com

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Nicholas Dedring

 

From:
Beacon, New York, USA
Post  Posted 18 Feb 2004 10:12 am    
Reply with quote

Gene, were you already using a matchbox type device in your chain?

If so, as Jon said above, the three-cord setup would not have made a difference. I do hear a change when I go with three cords on the S400LTD. It's just sort of crisper, more bite to the sound.
View user's profile Send private message

Gene Jones

 

From:
Oklahoma City, OK USA, (deceased)
Post  Posted 18 Feb 2004 10:33 am    
Reply with quote

No, I did not use a Matchbox util about ten years later. I only used the amp reverb.
www.genejones.com
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

David Doggett


From:
Bawl'mer, MD (formerly of MS, Nawluns, Gnashville, Knocksville, Lost Angeles, Bahsten. and Philly)
Post  Posted 18 Feb 2004 12:06 pm    
Reply with quote

The 3 chord hookup helps give the same EQ balance over the whole range of the volume pedal. Over your playing range, there might not be much difference. If you change your volume on the amp between playing a gig and playing at home, your playing range on the volume pedal may be similar, and you might not notice a difference with the 3 chord hookup. However, if you leave your amp volume wide open, and try to play quietly at home by backing way off on the volume pedal, the highs will sound muffled without the 3 chord hookup. At least that was my experience in the past.

I use a Hilton pedal now, so don't have this problem. But with some pickups and guitars (and amps) I have to use the Hilton's tone control to cut back the highs a little. That's just a matter of taste and preference.

[This message was edited by David Doggett on 18 February 2004 at 12:07 PM.]

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Tim Rowley

 

From:
Pinconning, MI, USA
Post  Posted 21 Feb 2004 12:11 pm    
Reply with quote

Having a conventional pot-type Emmons crossbar-mount volume pedal on my LeGrande II, I generally use the 3-cable hookup with either my Nashville 400 or Session 500 amplifiers. This does make these amps sound fuller in the lower frequencies. And here's another advantage: if the pot in your pedal is beginning to get a little "scratchy", you won't hear the scratch with the 3-cable hookup.

By the way and FWIW (most of you probably already know this), the 3-cable setup doesn't work well with all amplifiers, notably my Peavey Bandit 112. My steel guitar keeps the preamp stage of the Bandit overdriven all the time if I try to patch the volume pedal into the loop circuit. But it sounds fine when hooked up in the conventional manner.

Tim Rowley
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Donny Hinson

 

From:
Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
Post  Posted 21 Feb 2004 1:00 pm    
Reply with quote

Quote:
I didn't have a problem, I just didn't think the 3-cord hookup improved anything.


That's an astute observation, and totally true if you're using single-coil pickups, a good amp, and good cords. I've heard dozens of steelers remark that you need matchboxes or amplified pedals to get a good sound, so I'll make this statement just for all the "newbies". All of the steel recordings made in the early-to-mid '60's had beautiful tones, with wonderful highs (far better than you hear today), and absolutely none of 'em used either of these devices! (Think of early Emmons, Brumley, and Mooney recordings. Did any of them lack highs?)

But...if you saddle yourself with today's high-impedance humbucking pickups, or an anemic amp, you'll probably find these extra gimmicks necessary to get a good sound.

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Gerald Menke

 

From:
Stormville NY, USA
Post  Posted 27 Feb 2004 8:50 am    
Reply with quote

This is really dumb, but what are you guys talking about? Would someone please take pity on me and elaborate on what the "3 chord pedal hookup" is? I know you all aren't talking about B minor in the key of G.

FWIW, I seem to get a decent tone with two cords, Steel>Hilton>Amp.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

C Dixon

 

From:
Duluth, GA USA
Post  Posted 27 Feb 2004 10:36 am    
Reply with quote

Gerald,

The term "3 cable set" as used by steel players began when Peavey came up with a way to get around the volume pedal causing a deterioration of sound at different levels.

If I am not mistaken, their Session 500 was the first amp to do this. In essence here is what happened:

Instead of placing the vol pedal between the guitar and amp using a single cable, you go direct with ONE cable.

Then you take the SECOND cable on go FROM your amp TO your vol pedal.

Finally you take the 3rd cable and go FROM your vol pedal back TO the amp. Peavey provided two extra jacks marked "FROM" and "TO" to make this simple to hook up.

When they included this great feature into other amps they labeled it "effects loop" rather than "pedal". Because effects units placed between the guitar and the amp MAY, I repeat MAY cause some degradation of sound.

However, what causes all the hoopla over it, is evident in most of the posts in this thread. Hopefully with this explanation, you can go back and understand what has been said, and more importantly in some cases why.

May Jesus guide you in your quests,

carl
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Gerald Menke

 

From:
Stormville NY, USA
Post  Posted 27 Feb 2004 12:14 pm    
Reply with quote

Dear Carl,

Thanks a lot for the explanation. I have never used a Peavey amp for the steel (I am a thermionic emmission process addict). Your explanation was very clear and helpful.

Gerald
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Richard Sinkler


From:
aka: Rusty Strings -- Missoula, Montana
Post  Posted 27 Feb 2004 2:51 pm    
Reply with quote

In which chain do you hook up your stomp boxes?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

C Dixon

 

From:
Duluth, GA USA
Post  Posted 28 Feb 2004 10:01 am    
Reply with quote

Gerald,

I am with you too. Only problem is my heater is fast growing dimmer and as such my cathode is no longer thermionically heated high enough to emit anything let alone how it used to bombard my dinner plate (or others ) at suppertime.



Richard,

Unless you have a matching device between your guitar and the amp; such as a Goodrich or Hilton, it is best to always put your stomp boxes in the effects loop. Again, this ensures that the amp "sees" exactly what is coming off the PU, IF for no other reason than to improve the signal to noise ratio.

carl
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website


All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  

Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction,
steel guitars & accessories

www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

Please review our Forum Rules and Policies

Steel Guitar Forum LLC
PO Box 237
Mount Horeb, WI 53572 USA


Click Here to Send a Donation

Email admin@steelguitarforum.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for
Band-in-a-Box

by Jim Baron
HTTP