George L cables
Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn
-
- Posts: 1752
- Joined: 29 Nov 1998 1:01 am
- Location: San Antonio,Texas
George L cables
After reading the post about cables in the Steel Players section I think I will switch to george L's....but I'm wondering if the diameter will matter? Anyone have any feedback regarding the .155 and the .225 diameters?
- Bill Ferguson
- Posts: 5692
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Milton, FL USA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 951
- Joined: 18 Nov 1998 1:01 am
- Location: stowe, vermont
- chas smith
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: 28 Feb 2001 1:01 am
- Location: Encino, CA, USA
-
- Posts: 220
- Joined: 18 Oct 1999 12:01 am
- Location: Crofton, KY USA
-
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: 13 Jan 2002 1:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
- CrowBear Schmitt
- Posts: 11624
- Joined: 8 Apr 2000 12:01 am
- Location: Ariege, - PairO'knees, - France
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1019
- Joined: 14 Jan 2002 1:01 am
- Location: Chazy, NY, USA 1
Both cables are very good. I can hear a difference in the sound between the .155 and .225 . The .225 seems to have less low end loss. I spoke in length with Randy Beavers at the Norwalk show. Randy told me that he and Johnny Cox compared the two types and there was a definite difference in tone that they both could hear. Randy prefers the .225 . I guess the best choice would depend opon the equipment you are using and what tone you prefer. Try then both if possible.