A final plea...........
Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 3 Nov 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Kent, Ohio
A final plea...........
First, many thanks to all for their comments on favorite components. I am still attempting to make an intelligent decision on the rackmount vs. amp setup. I have tentatively narrowed my selection down to the 3 configurations below. I know tone is very subjective and equally difficult to describe in words. For what its worth, my attraction to the instrument is E9th country ballad steel. I strongly lean toward the "highs". I have a ZumSteel S10. Here are my configurations.
I would greatly appreciate any comments of the tradeoffs between each of them.
1. Mosvalve 1500 power amp, 9002 real tube2 with steel mod, Lexicon MPX-1, JBL speakers(from Webb)
2. SteroSteel preamp/power amp, Lexicon MPX-1, JBL speakers (from SteroSteel or Webb)
3. High-end Webb amp for Steel containing JBL. (I assume adding the Lexicon here would be overkill?)
Thanks in advance for sharing,
Allen
I would greatly appreciate any comments of the tradeoffs between each of them.
1. Mosvalve 1500 power amp, 9002 real tube2 with steel mod, Lexicon MPX-1, JBL speakers(from Webb)
2. SteroSteel preamp/power amp, Lexicon MPX-1, JBL speakers (from SteroSteel or Webb)
3. High-end Webb amp for Steel containing JBL. (I assume adding the Lexicon here would be overkill?)
Thanks in advance for sharing,
Allen
After playing Evans amps for 20 years, I switched to a Stereo Steel rig 2 years ago. Check out the web site at: http://www.stereosteel.com
GD Walker is an electronics genius and as a steel player himself, has designed his system to be the most player friendly unit I've seen. You can buy his rig complete with preamp/amp, Digitech Studio Quad 4 digital processor, and speakers. It's the best sounding, lightest, and most complete setup I know of that you can buy as one unit.
At one time I had the Stereo Steel and a Mosvalve 500 amp side by side. The tests I did revealed hardly any difference in sound, and with the Stereo Steel's built in preamp, it saved me from buying another rack piece, plus it's MUCH lighter!
------------------
Jim Smith jimsmith94@home.com
-=Dekley D-12 10&12=-
-=Fessenden Ext. E9/U-12 8&5=-
GD Walker is an electronics genius and as a steel player himself, has designed his system to be the most player friendly unit I've seen. You can buy his rig complete with preamp/amp, Digitech Studio Quad 4 digital processor, and speakers. It's the best sounding, lightest, and most complete setup I know of that you can buy as one unit.
At one time I had the Stereo Steel and a Mosvalve 500 amp side by side. The tests I did revealed hardly any difference in sound, and with the Stereo Steel's built in preamp, it saved me from buying another rack piece, plus it's MUCH lighter!
------------------
Jim Smith jimsmith94@home.com
-=Dekley D-12 10&12=-
-=Fessenden Ext. E9/U-12 8&5=-
- Steve Feldman
- Posts: 3345
- Joined: 5 Dec 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Central MA USA
On #3 - depends what you mean by overkill. You have A LOT of options with the Lex that aren't present on the Webb. But then you've got a combo + a one-space rack to lug around. I expect the Webb has pretty nice reverb, but I don't have any personal experience. If I got the Webb, I'd probably forego on the Lex and save that for a rack system in the future.
I have owned both #1 and #2, but with Emminence speakers instead of the JBLs. Both are outstanding. But if you liked the highs, my bet would be that you'd go for the Tubeworks preamp over Gerry's SS unit (slight edge). Either way, you will have a GREAT system.
Finally, my guess is that no matter how you end up going, you'll have ants-in-your-pants before long, wanting to try out newer, better(?) things or searching for 'some sound' that's in your head. I think it's the nature of the beast.
I have owned both #1 and #2, but with Emminence speakers instead of the JBLs. Both are outstanding. But if you liked the highs, my bet would be that you'd go for the Tubeworks preamp over Gerry's SS unit (slight edge). Either way, you will have a GREAT system.
Finally, my guess is that no matter how you end up going, you'll have ants-in-your-pants before long, wanting to try out newer, better(?) things or searching for 'some sound' that's in your head. I think it's the nature of the beast.
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 3 Nov 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Kent, Ohio
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 3 Nov 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Kent, Ohio
- Jack Stoner
- Posts: 22087
- Joined: 3 Dec 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Kansas City, MO
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 3 Nov 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Kent, Ohio
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 3 Nov 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Kent, Ohio
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 3 Nov 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Kent, Ohio
My observation, Allen, is that there is more sound shaping versatility in a rack system than in either the Peavey Session 400 Ltd. or the Evans FET 500 Custom that I have. My rack has a Carvin Tube preamp and Mosvalve 962 (lower power than the 500).
But I have also found that a lot of bets are off when you are cranking and mixing in with a band. Then the useful tonal range is much narrower--the finesse tone tweaks don't matter much when you are looking to cut through the mix. I'm talking about bar level playing. Different story if you're running through the board into a sound system.
Anyway, for me an important factor is the convenience of a combo amp. The Evans is at the moment my unit of choice--it is lighter than the Session (and more cookin') and it is one less piece than a rack and speaker cab.
Put wheels on it, put the guitar case on top, accessory bag on top, and I'm a wheelin' down the road fool.
JMHO
------------------
<font size =1><center>Carter U-12</center>
<center>StartUp Steel</center>
<center>Photo Gallery</center></font>
<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Jon Light on 08 November 2000 at 02:33 PM.]</p></FONT>
But I have also found that a lot of bets are off when you are cranking and mixing in with a band. Then the useful tonal range is much narrower--the finesse tone tweaks don't matter much when you are looking to cut through the mix. I'm talking about bar level playing. Different story if you're running through the board into a sound system.
Anyway, for me an important factor is the convenience of a combo amp. The Evans is at the moment my unit of choice--it is lighter than the Session (and more cookin') and it is one less piece than a rack and speaker cab.
Put wheels on it, put the guitar case on top, accessory bag on top, and I'm a wheelin' down the road fool.
JMHO
------------------
<font size =1><center>Carter U-12</center>
<center>StartUp Steel</center>
<center>Photo Gallery</center></font>
<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Jon Light on 08 November 2000 at 02:33 PM.]</p></FONT>
- bob drawbaugh
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: 30 Dec 1999 1:01 am
- Location: scottsboro, al. usa
-
- Posts: 708
- Joined: 8 Apr 1999 12:01 am
- Location: Onalaska, Tx. on Lake Livingston * R.I.P.
Allen,
I play the same Stereo Steel set up built by Gerry Walker that Jim Smith has and believe me ,it is a fantastic set up . Gerry is a fine guy to deal with and will always do what he says . I have been more than happy with my Stereo Steel Combo ,Digitech Quad 4 effects unit and two ( 2) tuned, closed back cabinets loaded with 15 inch Peavey Black Widow Speakers . All ( except the speakers of course ) built by Gerry Walker . Wish I had purchased the entire set up before I did . I have had it about two years and played it hard ! It is light weight and very user friendly .
I can say it has always given me the very best service, great sound and "punch" I wanted .
Check it out closely with Gerry before you finally decide !! Don't believe you will be sorry .
I wish you the best of luck with whatever you choose !
John
I play the same Stereo Steel set up built by Gerry Walker that Jim Smith has and believe me ,it is a fantastic set up . Gerry is a fine guy to deal with and will always do what he says . I have been more than happy with my Stereo Steel Combo ,Digitech Quad 4 effects unit and two ( 2) tuned, closed back cabinets loaded with 15 inch Peavey Black Widow Speakers . All ( except the speakers of course ) built by Gerry Walker . Wish I had purchased the entire set up before I did . I have had it about two years and played it hard ! It is light weight and very user friendly .
I can say it has always given me the very best service, great sound and "punch" I wanted .
Check it out closely with Gerry before you finally decide !! Don't believe you will be sorry .
I wish you the best of luck with whatever you choose !
John
- Jerry Overstreet
- Posts: 12622
- Joined: 11 Jul 2000 12:01 am
- Location: Louisville Ky
Allen, You can't miss with either option 1 or 2. I have both of these rigs [the Tubeworks is the earlier bkbutler model]
I don't know which I like better.
Tubeworks...big and warm tube type sound wonderful tone but weighty. 2 channels.
Stereo Steel...LOTS of neat features and lighter...solid state sound and you deal with the owner/builder GD Walker. Best service around.. He will take care of you. I need to sell one of these but I can't decide.....
I don't know which I like better.
Tubeworks...big and warm tube type sound wonderful tone but weighty. 2 channels.
Stereo Steel...LOTS of neat features and lighter...solid state sound and you deal with the owner/builder GD Walker. Best service around.. He will take care of you. I need to sell one of these but I can't decide.....
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 3 Nov 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Kent, Ohio
- Kevin Mincke
- Posts: 3093
- Joined: 27 Dec 1998 1:01 am
- Location: Farmington, MN (Twin Cities-South Metro) USA
- Contact:
I have option(s) 1 & 3. 1 includes the TubeWorks 921 reverb in my rack & the Digitech 2112. I also have an older 6-14E Webb along with a 6-14 GP Webb (love those Webbs). There all very nice but different. Rack vs. single......depends on my playing venue I guess.
By the way......Polls aren't in yet!<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Kevin Mincke on 08 November 2000 at 10:52 PM.]</p></FONT>
By the way......Polls aren't in yet!<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Kevin Mincke on 08 November 2000 at 10:52 PM.]</p></FONT>
- Bill Rowlett
- Posts: 848
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Russellville, AR, USA
-
- Posts: 5857
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Oceanside, Calif, USA
- Contact:
Sorry Jack Stoner,
The team I sent to florida to recount the votes threw yours out because you "punched it too hard bubba"
carl
PS. Wouldn't it be nice if all candidates in history could go back and keep counting until it turned out like THEY wanted it and then of course the country must abide by their findings?
NOT!
The team I sent to florida to recount the votes threw yours out because you "punched it too hard bubba"
carl
PS. Wouldn't it be nice if all candidates in history could go back and keep counting until it turned out like THEY wanted it and then of course the country must abide by their findings?
NOT!
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 3 Nov 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Kent, Ohio
The polls are still open. After two recounts the standings are as follows.
Option #1 - 4
Option #2 - 4
Option #3 - 1
Write-in - 2
Since I have a chance at a good price on Option #1, I will keep recounting until Option #1 is the winner.....provided that the Florida Justice System doesn't shut me down tomorrow!
Option #1 - 4
Option #2 - 4
Option #3 - 1
Write-in - 2
Since I have a chance at a good price on Option #1, I will keep recounting until Option #1 is the winner.....provided that the Florida Justice System doesn't shut me down tomorrow!
- Roger Crawford
- Posts: 5264
- Joined: 10 Sep 1999 12:01 am
- Location: Griffin, GA USA
-
- Posts: 3067
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Nashville, TN USA
UNlike the Florida election, this is at least a contest where you'll be happy no matter what gets decided. These are all outstanding rigs and I can't imagine you'd feel bad with any of them. Seems like this one might come down to what prices you can find on each and what your personal version of 'convenience' is. In other words, you also ought to think in terms of what type of rig you'd rather be shuttling to and from wherever it is that you need to be shuttling them.