Session 500 weight?

Steel guitar amplifiers, effects, etc.

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

Post Reply
Bobby Boggs
Posts: 6437
Joined: 2 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Upstate SC.

Session 500 weight?

Post by Bobby Boggs »

Will someone tell me what a Session 500 mark iv with a 15 inch BW weighs? I have no scales at home, and the truck stop's closed. Image
User avatar
Jim Smith
Posts: 7946
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Midlothian, TX, USA

Post by Jim Smith »

I'd guess somewhat less than 1,000 pounds, but I could be wrong. Image
Steve Matlock
Posts: 214
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Bentonville, AR USA

Post by Steve Matlock »

My Session 500 is not a "Mark IV", but is probably the same otherwise. It has a 15" black widow and was purchased new around 1983 or so. I weighed mine on medical scales and it was around 81 or 82 pounds.

Steve
Bobby Boggs
Posts: 6437
Joined: 2 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Upstate SC.

Post by Bobby Boggs »

Thanks Steve,80 pounds is a lot heavy'er than it was 20 years ago.When you get to be 40 you'll know what I mean. Image
User avatar
Jim Smith
Posts: 7946
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Midlothian, TX, USA

Post by Jim Smith »

I saw one on eBay tonight and the ad said it weighed less than a Twin Reverb. Maybe one without JBL's?!?
Bobby Boggs
Posts: 6437
Joined: 2 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Upstate SC.

Post by Bobby Boggs »

My twin with a 15 JBL weighed 70 lbs
User avatar
Lee Baucum
Posts: 10326
Joined: 11 Apr 1999 12:01 am
Location: McAllen, Texas (Extreme South) The Final Frontier

Post by Lee Baucum »

What did the Mark IV signify? The only 500's I ever saw said Mark IV on the front.

I take that back. I saw one of the very first ones, that was in the shorter cabinet. I don't believe it said Mark IV on the front.

One other thing. Peavey's literature stated that you could get a 500 with one 18" speaker. Has anyone ever seen one of those beasts?

Lee, from South Texas
User avatar
Jack Stoner
Posts: 22087
Joined: 3 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

Post by Jack Stoner »

I had a twin and thought I'd got to the solid state Session 500 because it would be lighter. Right! I couldn't really tell any difference. I had one of the original models with the smaller cabinet, but it had a helluva sound. I finally sold it when the factory modified Nashville 400's came out.
terryb
Posts: 16
Joined: 24 Sep 2000 12:01 am
Location: St. Helena, CA USA

Post by terryb »

I have a Twin 110, piggy-back with JBL's. They both wiegh about two tons! Yeah, after 40, you do begin to notice these little nuances! Image 47 here.
Tim Rowley
Posts: 957
Joined: 23 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Pinconning, MI, USA

Post by Tim Rowley »

I have one of the early short-cabinet Session 500's and it weighs just over 80# which is a bit heavier than a stock Twin Reverb. I almost never carry it by the handle for fear I will hurt my hand. However, a Twin with the Fender Lifetime speakers (gold) or a pair of 12" JBL's will outweigh the Session 500 by a few pounds because I've carried them before too. Like Billy sez, yes the short-cabinet 500 is powerhouse of an amp. Kenny Gill and I were working a show together in 1999 and he used my 500. His exact words were "this amp's a monster!"

As to the Session 500 with the 18" speaker, yes a few were made in the early design. They look the same as mine but the cabinet is a little taller. A lady steeler here in Michigan has one that she plays her old crossover Sho-Bud thru. I plugged my stock push-pull Emmons into it one time just to check it out and did not care for the tone. No way I could adjust it to please my ears. Her Sho-Bud sounds OK thru it though.

Tim R.
Bobby Boggs
Posts: 6437
Joined: 2 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Upstate SC.

Post by Bobby Boggs »

Didn't they call the small cab 500's LTD's?
User avatar
Jack Stoner
Posts: 22087
Joined: 3 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

Post by Jack Stoner »

I had one of the original small cabinet models and it was just a "Session 500". No LTD or any other extra identification.
Chuck Smith
Posts: 85
Joined: 12 May 1999 12:01 am
Location: Crockett, Texas ,U.S.A.

Post by Chuck Smith »

Boy, I sure feel for all you "kids" having to carry the old 500..Wait till you hit 65!! and tote it onto those stages with 3-4 steps. Image Image But they still sound the best to me..

------------------
Chuck.. ."Every day's a Holiday and every night's a Party";)

Bobby Boggs
Posts: 6437
Joined: 2 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Upstate SC.

Post by Bobby Boggs »

The amp I'm thinking about is called a Session 500 Limited.I think they where made in the late 80's.Has anyone seen one of these or did I imagine this?
John Cadeau
Posts: 498
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Surrey,B.C. Canada

Post by John Cadeau »

I have a session 500, and I love it. I ain't 65, but I'm gettin' there. Even if I have to rent a forklift to get it to a gig I'll be happy.
John
P Perry
Posts: 506
Joined: 22 Nov 1999 1:01 am
Location: Lebanon, OH, USA

Post by P Perry »

The "Session 500" was 300 watts right? so the "500" must have stood for 500 pound. By the way got one for sale check buy and sell. By the way I am not pricing it by the pound.
Post Reply