ZumSteel Mystery
Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: 5 Oct 2003 12:01 am
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
ZumSteel Mystery
Can anyone tell me what year this Zum may have been built? I have bought it as an extended E9 set up but wasn't sure what I have gotten my hands on. It is a great guitar - stays in tune but want to modify the copedant. Thanks!
BP
BP
- Jerry Overstreet
- Posts: 12622
- Joined: 11 Jul 2000 12:01 am
- Location: Louisville Ky
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: 5 Oct 2003 12:01 am
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: 5 Oct 2003 12:01 am
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
- Jerry Overstreet
- Posts: 12622
- Joined: 11 Jul 2000 12:01 am
- Location: Louisville Ky
- scott murray
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Asheville, NC
no it looks like yours was #27 built in 1977. note 1 pertains to the first 20 built.Brinton Payne wrote:So per the chart I am guessing it falls under the 'note 1' aspect of this sheet?
Hybrid guitars came much later
1965 Emmons S-10, 3x5 • Emmons LLIII D-10, 10x12 • JCH D-10, 10x12 • Beard MA-8 • Oahu Tonemaster
- Steven Golding
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 28 Jun 2020 7:15 pm
- Location: New York, USA
I recently got a Zum, and my serial number is not aligned with the guitar. For example, the serial number says it should have 9 pedals and 5 knees. The guitar is a D10 with 8 pedals and 3 knees. The rack only has room for 8 pedals too. I just question the accuracy of this system over the 30+ years Zums were built.
At the end of the day, the guitar plays really well stays in tune, and is easy to work on. I'm grateful to own it.
At the end of the day, the guitar plays really well stays in tune, and is easy to work on. I'm grateful to own it.
-
- Posts: 699
- Joined: 22 May 2006 12:01 am
- Location: Collins, Mississippi USA
- Damir Besic
- Posts: 12261
- Joined: 30 Oct 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Nashville,TN.
- Contact:
Steven Golding wrote:I recently got a Zum, and my serial number is not aligned with the guitar. For example, the serial number says it should have 9 pedals and 5 knees. The guitar is a D10 with 8 pedals and 3 knees. The rack only has room for 8 pedals too. I just question the accuracy of this system over the 30+ years Zums were built.
At the end of the day, the guitar plays really well stays in tune, and is easy to work on. I'm grateful to own it.
Bruce was very particular about his guitars, so I’m pretty sure somebody was pulling parts off of your ZUM if anything is missing …
-
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: 17 May 2010 9:27 am
- Location: West Virginia, USA
- Steven Golding
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 28 Jun 2020 7:15 pm
- Location: New York, USA
This was my thought after researching these instruments. I don't want to hijack the thread, but It seems I have a similar quandary. When I get a chance, I'll post a picture of the underbelly. Maybe someone will have some information for me.Damir Besic wrote:Steven Golding wrote:I recently got a Zum, and my serial number is not aligned with the guitar. For example, the serial number says it should have 9 pedals and 5 knees. The guitar is a D10 with 8 pedals and 3 knees. The rack only has room for 8 pedals too. I just question the accuracy of this system over the 30+ years Zums were built.
At the end of the day, the guitar plays really well stays in tune, and is easy to work on. I'm grateful to own it.
Bruce was very particular about his guitars, so I’m pretty sure somebody was pulling parts off of your ZUM if anything is missing …
I have gotten in contact with Bruce for a part I need. I've been meaning to ask him about his numbering system throughout his career.